How do medium naturalness, teaching-learning interactions and Students' personality traits affect participation in synchronous E -learning?

Abrami, 2011, Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 82, 10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x Allen, 2011 Amichai-Hamburger, 2007, Personality, individual differences and internet use, 187 Amichai-Hamburger, 2003, Loneliness and internet use, Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71, 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6 Amichai-Hamburger, 2016, Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions, Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 268, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009 Amichai-Hamburger, 2002, "On the internet no one knows I'm an introvert": Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 125, 10.1089/109493102753770507 Banna, 2015, Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11 Blau, 2010, Participation in group discussions through face-to-face, chat, and audio communication modes, as influenced by participant personality and discussion topic Blau, 2009, 19 Blau, 2012, How do personality, synchronous media, anddiscussion topic affect participation?, EducationalTechnology & Society, 15, 12 Blau, 2008, Do media richness and visual anonymity influencelearning? A comparative study using Skype™, 18 Blau, 2010, Studying invisibly: Media naturalness and learning, 193 Blau, 2017, Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course, Instructional Science, 1 Blau, 2017, Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation, Computers & Education, 115, 69, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014 Blau, 2016 Blau, 2017, How do medium naturalness and personality traits shape academic achievement and perceived learning? An experimental study of face-to-face and synchronous e-learning., Research in Learning Technology, 25, 2156, 10.25304/rlt.v25.1974 Bernard, 2009, A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education, Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243, 10.3102/0034654309333844 Bondi, 2016, Learning through personal connections: Cogenerative dialogues in synchronous virtual spaces, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 301, 10.1080/13562517.2016.1141288 Brenton, 2015, Effective online teaching and learning, 139 Chen, 2015, Exploring students' discussion in face to face and online synchronous learning, 183 Costa, 1992 Costa, 2008, The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r), Vol. 2, 179 Cullen, 2011, Who's contributing: Do personality traits influence the level and type of participation in online communities, 1 Digmann, 2016 Dixson, 2012, Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 1 Eysenck, 1975 Giesbers, 2013, Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 285, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005 Hew, 2012 Kauffman, 2015, A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning, Research in Learning Technology, 23, 10.3402/rlt.v23.26507 Kock, 2005, Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward e-communication tools, Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 48, 117, 10.1109/TPC.2005.849649 Livny, 2014, Comparison of remote teaching styles employed during video-based teaching sessions and frontal classes, at the Open University of Israel, 77 López-Pérez, 2011, Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes, Computers & Education, 56, 818, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 Maldonado, 2001, Personality, sex and communication via internet, Anuario de Psicologia, 32, 51 Malinen, 2015, Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies, Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004 Malone, 2012, The general belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness, Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 311, 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.027 McBrien, 2009, Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10, 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605 McCrae, 2004, A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587, 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1 McKenna, 2002, Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction?, Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9, 10.1111/1540-4560.00246 McKenna, 2007 Moore, 1989, Three types of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1, 10.1080/08923648909526659 Redpath, 2012, Confronting the bias against on-line learning in management education, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 125, 10.5465/amle.2010.0044 Robert, 2005, Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 10, 10.1109/TPC.2004.843292 Salmon, 2013 Schneider, 2015, 109 Setlock, 2007, Does culture interact with media richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads, 13 Sun, 2007, The design of instructional multimedia in e-learning: A media richness theory-based approach, Computers & Education, 49, 662, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.016 Tlili, 2016, Role of personality in computer based learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 805, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.043 Vasileva-Stojanovska, 2015, Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment, Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127, 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.018 Vetter, 2006, Supporting oral production for professional purposes in synchronous communication with heterogenous learners, ReCALL, 18, 5, 10.1017/S0958344006000218 Warschauer, 1996, Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom, CALICO Journal, 13, 7, 10.1558/cj.v13i2-3.7-26 Weiser, 2016, Synchronous learning –face-to-face, one-way, and two-way videoconferencing: The role of teaching-learningstrategies, personality traits and media naturalness, 91 Weiser, 2016, The role of pedagogy media and students'personality in synchronous learning: comparing face-to-face andvideoconferencing participation Zheng, 2015, Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment, Computers & Education, 84, 78, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008