How do consumers switch between close substitutes when price variation is small? The case of cigarette types
Spanish Economic Review - 2006
Tóm tắt
Past empirical studies report ambiguous results regarding the magnitude and significance of substitution between different types of smoking tobacco. Since all types of tobacco contain nicotine this is quite surprising. Using a 20-year rotating panel data set of Norwegian households and a multinomial logit model, we find evidence that consumers switch between tobacco types: first, estimated price effects on choice probabilities have mostly expected signs, albeit their statistical significance vary across different metrics, second, household characteristics affect tobacco composition significantly. These findings suggest that consumers’ choices are ‘locked’ when the relative price variation is small, as has been the case in most of the data period, but that larger changes could induce large-scale switching between tobacco types. Our conjecture is that there is a latent potential for switching, which will become manifest if prices change sufficiently. Similar considerations are likely to have relevance for other close substitutes.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andersen EB (1970) Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators. J R Stat Soc Ser B 32:283–301
Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96:675–700
Biørn E, Jansen ES (1982) Econometrics of incomplete cross-section/time-series data: consumer demand in Norwegian households 1975–1977. Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo
Bretteville-Jensen AL, Biørn E (2003) Heroin consumption, prices and addiction: evidence from self-reported panel data. Scand J Econ 105:661–679
Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE (2000) The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds). Handbook of Health Economics.vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam
Chamberlain G (1984) Panel data. In: Griliches Z, Intriligator MD (eds). Handbook of econometrics. vol. 2. North Holland, Amsterdam,
Crouch EAC, Spiegelman D (1990) The evaluation of integrals of the form ∫ ∞−∞ f(t)exp( − t 2)dt: application to logistic-normal models. J Am Stat Assoc 85:464–469
Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Andersen A, Tretli S (1996) The impact of smoking habits on lung cancer risk: 28 years’ observation of 26,000 Norwegian men and women. Cancer Causes Control 7:366–376
Evans WN, Farrelly MC (1998) The compensating behavior of smokers: taxes, tar, and nicotine. RAND J Econ 29:578–595
Farrelly MC, Nimsch CT, Hyland A, Cummings M (2004) The effect of higher cigarette prices on tar and nicotine consumption in a cohort of adult smokers. Health Econ 13:49–58
Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. In: Rosen S (eds). Studies in labor markets. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Honoré BE, Lewbel A (2002) Semiparametric binary choice panel data models without strictly exogenous regressors. Econometrica 70:2053–2063
Horowitz JL (1997) Bootstrap methods in econometrics: theory and numerical performance. In: Kreps DM, Wallis KF (eds). Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications. vol 3.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
Jain DP, Vilcassim NJ, Chintagunta PK (1994) A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 12:317–328
Leu RE (1984) Anti-smoking publicity, taxation, and the demand for cigarettes. J Health Econ 3:101–116
Lluch C (1974) Expenditure, savings and habit formation. Int Econ Rev 15:786–797
Miles D (2000) The probability that a smoker does not purchase tobacco: a note. Oxford Bull Economics Stat 62:647–656
NAG (1993) The NAG Fortran Library Manual, Mark 16. The Numerical Algorithm Group , Oxford
Nielsen HS, Rosholm M (1997) The incidence of unemployment identifying quits and layoffs. Working paper No. 97–15, Centre for labor market and social research, University of Aarhus and the Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus
Pekurinen M (1989) The demand for tobacco products in Finland. Br J Addict 84:1183–1192
Pekurinen M (1991) Economic aspects of smoking. Research Reports 16/1991, National Agency for Welfare and Health, Helsinki
Thompson B (2004) The “Significance” crisis in psychology and education. J Socioecon 33:609–613
Thompson ME, McLeod I (1976) The effects of economic variables upon the demand for cigarettes in Canada. Math Sci 1:121–32
Wangen KR, Biørn E (2001a) Individual heterogeneity and price responses in tobacco consumption: a two-commodity analysis of unbalanced panel data. Discussion Paper No. 294, Statistics Norway, Oslo
Wangen K.R, Biørn E (2001b) Prevalence and substitution effects in tobacco consumption: a discrete choice analysis of panel data. Discussion Paper No. 312, Statistics, Norway, Oslo
WHO (1997) Tobacco or health? A global status report. World Health Organization, Geneva