How can authorities be enablers in the deployment of CCAM? An experienced-based expert study from Norway

Abbott, 2005, Understanding and managing the unknown the nature of uncertainty in planning, J. Plan. Educ. Res., 24, 237, 10.1177/0739456X04267710 Aggarwal, G., 2021. How Is 5G Relevant In The Present Day? - The Architect Coach. https://thearchitectcoach.com/how-is-5g-relevant-in-the-present-day/. Bagloee, 2016, Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies, J. Modern Transport., 24, 284, 10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3 Bansal, 2017, Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 95, 49, 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013 Bezai, 2021, Future cities and autonomous vehicles: analysis of the barriers to full adoption, Energy Built Environ., 2, 65, 10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.002 Cohen, 2020, A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles, Transport. Res. Interdiscipl. Perspectives, 6, 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133 Docherty, 2018, The governance of smart mobility, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 115, 114, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012 Dudley, 2000 Eitrheim, 2022, Opportunities and barriers for truck platooning on Norwegian rural freight routes, Transp. Res. Rec., 2676, 810, 10.1177/03611981221076438 European Commission. (2021a). A European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. European Commission. (2021b). Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f9b12d1d-74ea-11ec-9136-01aa75ed71a1. European Commission. (2021c). Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-04/2021-mobility-strategy-and-action-plan.pdf. Fagnant, 2015, Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 77, 167, 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 Fraedrich, 2019, Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 122, 162, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.018 Glaser, 2019, Learning to build strategic capacity for transportation policy change: An interdisciplinary exploration, Transport. Res. Interdisciplinary Perspect., 1, 100006, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100006 Goodman, L.A., 1961. Snowball sampling. 32(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/AOMS/1177705148. Hansson, 2020, Regulatory governance in emerging technologies: the case of autonomous vehicles in Sweden and Norway, Res. Transp. Econ., 83, 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100967 Hopkins, 2021, Talking about automated vehicles: What do levels of automation do?, Technol. Soc., 64 Hurdalsplattformen 2021–2025. (2021). Hurdalsplattformen. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/cb0adb6c6fee428caa81bd5b339501b0/no/pdfs/hurdalsplattformen.pdf. Jones, 2005 Kalinauskaite, 2021, Facing societal challenges in living labs: towards a conceptual framework to facilitate transdisciplinary collaborations, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 1 Khan, 2023, Level-5 autonomous driving - are we there yet? a review of research literature, ACM Comput. Surv., 55, 1, 10.1145/3485767 König, 2017, Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car, Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 44, 42, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013 KPMG International. (2020). 2020 Autonomous vehicles readiness index: assessing the preparedness of 30 countries and jurisdiction on the race for autonomous vehicles. Laurian, 2009, Trust in planning: theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning, Plan. Theory Pract., 10, 369, 10.1080/14649350903229810 Li, 2019, Policy formulation for highly automated vehicles: emerging importance, research frontiers and insights, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 124, 573, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.010 Lundin, 2007, Explaining cooperation: how resource interdependence, goal congruence, and trust affect joint actions in policy implementation, J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, 17, 651, 10.1093/jopart/mul025 Lyons, 2016, Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 88, 104, 10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012 Malekpour, 2020, Bridging Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) and Transition Management (TM) to improve strategic planning for sustainable development, Environ. Sci. Policy, 107, 158, 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.002 Marsden, 2017, Questions of governance: rethinking the study of transportation policy, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 101, 238, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008 Meld.St. 28 (2020-2021). (2021). Vår felles digitale grunnmur. Samferdselsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-20-20202021/id2839503/. Metzger, 2021, The flexibility gamble: challenges for mainstreaming flexible approaches to climate change adaptation, J. Environ. Plann. Policy Manage., 23, 543, 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893160 Milakis, 2019, Long-term implications of automated vehicles: an introduction, Transp. Rev., 39, 1, 10.1080/01441647.2019.1545286 Milakis, 2021, The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: towards a research agenda, Cities, 113, 103144, 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103144 Moqaddamerad, 2022, Managing business model innovation uncertainties in 5G technology: a future-oriented sensemaking perspective, R&D Manag. Mordue, 2020, The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 132, 174, 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.007 Neeley, 2019, In search of integration: Mapping conceptual efforts to apply STS to engineering education NordicWay, 2022. NordicWay EU project Portfolio. https://www.nordicway.net/. NRPA, 2022. Vårt samfunnsoppdrag. NRPA. https://www.vegvesen.no/om-oss/om-organisasjonen/om-statens-vegvesen/samfunnsoppdrag-ansvar-oppgaver/vart-samfunnsoppdrag/. OECD, 2022, Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions in Norway, OECD Prop. 152 L (2016 –2017) Lov om utprøving av selvkjørende kjøretøy. (2017). Puerari, 2018, Co-creation dynamics in Urban Living Labs, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10 Raj, 2020, A multicriteria decision making approach to study barriers to the adoption of autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 133, 122, 10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.013 Richardson, 2018, The discovery of cumulative knowledge: Strategies for designing and communicating qualitative research, Account. Audit. Account. J., 31, 563, 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1808 Rotmans, J., & Kemp, R. R. (2003). Managing Societal Transitions: Dilemmas and Uncertainties: The Dutch energy case study. OECD Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers, 31. http://www.oecd.org/env/cc/2483769.pdf. Ryghaug, 2023, A Social Sciences and Humanities research agenda for transport and mobility in Europe: key themes and 100 research questions, Transp. Rev., 43, 755, 10.1080/01441647.2023.2167887 SAE International. (2018). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles - SAE International. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/. Scharpf, 1997 Seter, H., Arnesen, P., 2017. Evaluation outcome report - Norway. Project note. NordicWay EU project. https://www.nordicway.net/previousprojects. Sharma, 2022, Quantifying the consumer’s dependence on different information sources on acceptance of autonomous vehicles, Transp. Res. A Policy Pract., 160, 179, 10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.009 Shladover, 2022, Opportunities, challenges, and uncertainties in urban road transport automation, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14 SRIA. (2021). Strateggic Reseach and Innovation Agenda 2021-2027. CCAM. https://www.ccam.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CCAM_SRIA-report_web.pdf. St. Storsæter, 2021, The automated driver as a new road user, Transp. Rev., 41, 533, 10.1080/01441647.2020.1861124 Taeihagh, 2019, Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks, Transp. Rev., 39, 103, 10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640 The US DOT. (2018). Lessons Learned from Tampa (THEA) Connected Vehicle Pilot Onboard Unit (OBU) Quality, Maturity and Deployment Readiness. https://www.its.dot.gov/pilots/thea_obu.htm. Tjora, A. (2018). Qualitative Research as Stepwise-Deductive Induction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730072. Vigar, 2017, The four knowledges of transport planning: enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making, Transp. Policy, 58, 39, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013 Walker, 2017, Dynamic adaptive policymaking for the sustainable city: the case of automated taxis, Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol., 6, 1, 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.03.004 Waltermann, 2023, Public discourse on automated vehicles in online discussion forums: a social constructionist perspective, Transport. Res. Interdiscipl. Perspectives, 17, 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100743 Wiener, 2004, The regulation of technology, and the technology of regulation, Technol. Soc., 26, 483, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.01.033 Wockatz, P., Schartau, P., 2015. Traveller Needs and UK Capability Study – Transport Systems Catapult. October, 35. https://ts.catapult.org.uk/current-projects/traveller-needs-uk-capability-study/.