How Product Category Shapes Preferences toward Global and Local Brands: A Schema Theory Perspective

Journal of International Marketing - Tập 24 Số 4 - Trang 61-81 - 2016
Vasileios Davvetas1, Adamantios Diamantopoulos1
1Department of International Marketing, University of Vienna

Tóm tắt

In contrast to the abundance of research on brand- and consumer-related determinants of global/local brand preference, little is known about whether and how the product category affects consumer choices between local and global brands. Drawing from schema theory, the authors (1) argue that consumers rely on their product category schemata to form perceptions of global versus local brand superiority, (2) introduce a compact scale to measure these perceptions, and (3) identify the key antecedents and consequences of these perceptions. Two studies in developed and emerging markets empirically support the hypotheses across multiple product categories, for both real and fictitious brands. The results indicate that consumers perceive global brands as superior to local brands in product categories with strong functional character and extensive symbolic capacity. Moreover, brands congruent with category superiority perceptions are preferred because of their justifiability, while brands that deviate from these perceptions are avoided because of their proneness to normative criticism. The findings imply that global/local brand preference is largely formed at the product category level and advocate for the use of category-specific strategies in global/local brand management.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

10.1177/002224299906300106

10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

10.1086/426626

10.1007/BF00436035

10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_3

Bauer Hans H., 2007, AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, 18, 307

10.1086/208911

10.1086/209154

10.1086/519142

10.1177/002224379102800102

FinanceBrand (2015), “Global 500: The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Global Brands,” (February), (accessed July 16, 2015), [available at http://www.brandfinance.com/images/upload/brand_finance_global_500_2015.pdf].

Burroughs W. Jeffrey, 1991, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 147

10.1086/323731

10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813

10.1007/s11238-011-9269-0

10.1111/1467-8721.00203

10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.05.004

DeVellis Robert F., 2003, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 2

10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718

10.1509/jimk.16.4.113

10.1086/209386

10.1509/jmkg.70.1.034.qxd

ETH (2014), “KOF Index of Globalization,” (accessed September 2, 2015), [available at http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/static/pdf/rankings_2014.pdf].

FarisStephan (2012), “Grounds Zero: A Starbucks-Free Italy,” Bloomberg Businessweek, (February 9), [available at http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/grounds-zero-a-starbucks-free-italy-02092012.html].

Fiske Susan T., 1982, Affect and Cognition: The Seventeenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, 55

Fiske Susan T., 1986, Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, 167

Fiske Susan T., 1991, Social Cognition.

10.1086/209515

10.1108/JPBM-02-2015-0818

10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.022

10.1080/00913367.2014.891087

Halkias Georgios, 2016, International Journal of Advertising

Hayes Andrew F., 2013, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.

Holt Douglas B., 2004, Harvard Business Review, 82, 68

Hoyer Wayne D., 2008, Consumer Behavior.

10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540230

Interbrand (2015), “Best Global Brands 2015,” (accessed June 8,2016), [available at http://interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2015/].

10.1037/h0036657

10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.005

10.1086/208542

10.1086/209361

10.1086/209192

MourdoukoutasPanos (2014), “McDonalds Lost the Greek Market. Is Starbucks Next?” Forbes, (June 24), (accessed July 16, 2015), [available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2014/06/24/mcdonalds-lost-the-greek-market-is-starbucks-next].

10.1509/jmkr.42.1.43.56889

10.1509/jim.11.0105

10.1509/jimk.16.4.1

10.1086/209476

10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

10.1509/jmr.10.0051

10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443

10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.002

10.1086/209414

10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.11.001

10.1080/08911760903022432

10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-S

10.1177/002224378702400304

10.1007/s11747-013-0328-7

10.1086/209205

10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400002

10.1086/209528

10.1509/jmkg.74.6.18

10.1509/jim.14.0037

10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.05.007

10.1177/002224378902600407

10.1509/jim.12.0105

10.1509/jimk.15.3.32

10.1108/S1474-797920140000025012

10.1108/IMR-01-2012-0001

World Bank (2014), “World Development Indicators,” (accessed September 10, 2015), [available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TG.VAL.TOTL.GD.ZS].

10.1509/jim.14.0009

10.1086/598794