How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Tóm tắt
Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?” Yet the radius problem—that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as “most people”—makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, “most people” in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groups. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of “most people” varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allport Gordon W., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
Axelrod Robert, 1990, The Evolution of Cooperation
Banfield Edward, 1958, The Moral Basis of a Backward Society
Coleman James, 1990, Foundations of Social Theory
Dahl Robert A., 2000, On Democracy
Dalen Kristin. 2005. “Trust and Distrust.” Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Bergen. Unpublished thesis.
Forbes Harold D., 2003, The Psychology of Ethnic and Cultural Conflict: Looking through American and Global Chaos or Harmony?, 69
Fukuyama Francis, 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
Fukuyama Francis, 1999, Presented at the IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, International Monetary Fund
Gambetta Diego, 1988, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 158
Gat Azar, 2008, War in Human Civilization
Hardin Russel, 2000, Democracy and Trust, 22
Held David, 2006, Models of Democracy
Inkeles Alex, 1966, The Modernization of Man
Inkeles Alex, 1998, One World Emerging? Convergence and Divergence in Industrial Societies
Lerner Daniel, 1958, The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East
Li W., 2002, Shehuixue Yanjiu (Sociological Research), 2, 11
Portes Alejandro, 1996, American Prospect, 26, 18
Roßteutscher Sigrid, 2008, Political Studies, 50, 445
Schupp Jürgen, Wagner Gert G. 2004. “Vertrauen in Deutschland: Großes Misstrauen gegenüber Institutionen.” Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin.
Shin Doh C., 2005, Values and Life Styles in Urban Asia, 57
Sztompka Piotr, 1999, Trust: A Sociological Theory
Triandis Harry C., 2004, Culture and Social Behavior
Uslaner Eric M. 2007. “The Generalized Trust Question in the 2006 ANES Pilot Survey.” Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Unpublished manuscript.
Van Deth Jan, 1996, Wahlen und Politische Einstellungen in Westlichen Demokratien, 389
Whiteley Paul F., 1999, Social Capital and European Democracy, 25
World Bank, 2010, World Development Indicators
World Values Survey Association, ed. 2009. World Values Survey 2005 Official Data File (version 20090901 at www.worldvaluessurvey.org).
You Jong-sungs, 2005, Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association