How Do Market Standards Inhibit the Enactment of Digital Capabilities?

Business & Information Systems Engineering - Tập 62 - Trang 279-287 - 2019
Daniel Fürstenau1,2, Catherine Cleophas3, Natalia Kliewer1
1Department of Information Systems, School of Business and Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Einstein Center Digital Future, Berlin, Germany
3Chair of Service Analytics, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Tóm tắt

Digital capabilities can improve organizations’ performance by supporting complex decision-making processes. However, when market standards constrain their enactment, the potential benefits promised by digital capabilities do not realize. The paper explores this tension by means of the critical case of a European airline, which had difficulty to enact a novel pricing approach and finds that market standards are entrenched in the airline’s pricing and distribution ecosystem. This causes the organization to focus on local improvements and IT-based workarounds instead of enacting a dramatically new and potentially improved digital pricing capability.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bitran G, Caldentey R (2003) An overview of pricing models for revenue management. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 5(3):203–229 Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin Serv Q 47(2):325–357 Burger M, Sydow J (2014) How interorganizational networks can become path-dependent: bargaining in the photonics industry. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 66(1):73–99 Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Serv Q 35(1):128–152 Copeland DG, McKenney JL (1988) Airline reservations systems: lessons from history. MIS Q 12(3):353–370 David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–337 Dutta S, Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2003) Pricing process as a capability: a resource-based perspective. Strateg Manag J 24(7):615–630 Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):105–1121 Elmaghraby W, Keskinocak P (2003) Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: research overview, current practices, and future directions. Manag Sci 49(10):1287–1309 Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245 Gerlach M, Cleophas C, Kliewer N (2013) Airline codeshare alliances. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(3):153–163 Golden BR (1992) The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad Manag J 35(4):848–860 Hinterhuber A, Liozu S (2017) The micro-foundations of pricing. J Bus Res 76(7):159–162 Introna L, Kavanagh D, Kelly S et al (2016) Beyond interpretivism? New encounters with technology and organization. Springer, Berlin Isler K, D’Souza E (2009) GDS capabilities, OD control and dynamic pricing. J Revenue Pricing Manag 8(2–3):255–266 Johns C (2017) Becoming a reflective practitioner, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken Kantor J, Streitfeld D (2015) Inside Amazon: wrestling big ideas in a bruising workplace. In: New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/technology/inside-amazon-wrestling-big-ideas-in-a-bruising-workplace.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019 Kirn W (2010) My cart, my self. In: New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/magazine/02fob-wwln-t.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019 Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):691–710 Le Baron C, Jarzabkowski P, Pratt M, Fetzer G (2018) An introduction to video methods in organizational research. Organ Res Methods 21(2):239–260 Lehrer M (2000) The organizational choice between evolutionary and revolutionary capability regimes: theory and evidence from European air transport. Ind Corp Change 9(3):489–520 Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2008) Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inf Organ 18(3):159–176 Littlewood K (2005) Forecasting and control of passenger bookings. J Revenue Pricing Manag 4(2):111–123 McAfee RP, te Velde VL (2006) Dynamic pricing in the airline industry. In: Andrew B. Whinston (ed) Economics and Information Systems. Emerald, Bingley, pp 527–570 O’Neil-Dunne T (2014) NDC—capable of its lofty ambitions or dead in the water? In: TNOOZ. http://www.tnooz.com/article/IATA-ndc-airline-distribution/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019 Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ Sci 13(3):249–273 Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2015) The algorithm and the crowd: considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Q 39(1):201–216 Pölt S (2011) The rise and fall of RM. J Revenue Pricing Manag 10(1):23–25 Scheiber N (2017) How Uber uses psychological tricks to push its drivers’ buttons. In: New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019 Schön DA (1991) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Taylor & Francis, London Schreyögg G, Kliesch-Eberl M (2007) How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strateg Manag J 28(9):913–933 Schreyögg G, Sydow J (2011) Organizational path dependence: a process view. Organ Stud 32(3):321–335 Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34(4):689–709 Westermann D (2013) Potential impact of IATA’s NDC on revenue management and pricing. J Revenue Pricing Manag 12(6):565–568 Wheeler BC (2002) NEBIC: a dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Inf Syst Res 13(2):125–146 Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ Sci 23(5):1398–1408