How Do Biota Respond to Additional Physical Restoration of Restored Streams?

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 20 - Trang 144-162 - 2016
Christer Nilsson1, Judith M. Sarneel1,2, Daniel Palm3, Johanna Gardeström1, Francesca Pilotto1, Lina E. Polvi1, Lovisa Lind1, Daniel Holmqvist4, Hans Lundqvist3
1Landscape Ecology Group, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
2Ecology & Biodiversity Group and Plant Ecophysiology Group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
4Ume/Vindel River Fishery Advisory Board, Lycksele, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Restoration of channelized streams by returning coarse sediment from stream edges to the wetted channel has become a common practice in Sweden. Yet, restoration activities do not always result in the return of desired biota. This study evaluated a restoration project in the Vindel River in northern Sweden in which practitioners further increased channel complexity of previously restored stream reaches by placing very large boulders (>1 m), trees (>8 m), and salmonid spawning gravel from adjacent upland areas into the channels. One reach restored with basic methods and another with enhanced methods were selected in each of ten different tributaries to the main channel. Geomorphic and hydraulic complexity was enhanced but the chemical composition of riparian soils and the communities of riparian plants and fish did not exhibit any clear responses to the enhanced restoration measures during the first 5 years compared to reaches restored with basic restoration methods. The variation in the collected data was among streams instead of between types of restored reaches. We conclude that restoration is a disturbance in itself, that immigration potential varies across landscapes, and that biotic recovery processes in boreal river systems are slow. We suggest that enhanced restoration has to apply a catchment-scale approach accounting for connectivity and availability of source populations, and that low-intensity monitoring has to be performed over several decades to evaluate restoration outcomes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acuna V, Díez JR, Flores L, Meleason M, Elosegi A. 2013. Does it make economic sense to restore rivers for their ecosystem services? J Appl Ecol 50:988–97. Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Peterson JT. 2009. Does mobility explain variation in colonisation and population recovery among stream fishes? Freshw Biol 54:1444–60. Alexander GG, Allan JD. 2007. Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the Midwestern United States. Environ Manage 40:245–55. Aronson J, Alexander S. 2013. Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restor Ecol 21:293–6. Aviron S, Herzog F, Klaus I, Schupbach B, Jeanneret P. 2011. Effects of wildflower strip quality, quantity, and connectivity on butterfly diversity in a Swiss arable landscape. Restor Ecol 19:500–8. Baker DW. 2009. Land use effects on physical habitat and nitrate uptake in small streams of the central Rocky Mountain region. PhD Dissertation, Fort Collins: Colorado State University. Balke T, Herman PMJ, Bouma TJ. 2014. Critical transitions in disturbance-driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery. J Ecol 102:700–8. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA. 2011. River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecol Appl 21:1926–31. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–7. Bernhardt ES, Sudduth EB, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Meyer JL, Alexander G, Follastad-Shah J, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Lave R, Rumps J, Pagano L. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–93. Brederveld RJ, Jähnig SC, Lorenz AW, Brunzel S, Soons MB. 2011. Dispersal as a limiting factor in the colonization of restored mountain streams by plants and macroinvertebrates. J Appl Ecol 48:1241–50. Briggs D. 1977. Sediments: sources and methods in geography. London: Butterworths. Brown RL, Chenoweth J. 2008. The effect of Glines Canyon Dam on hydrochorous seed dispersal in the Elwha River. Northwest Science 82:197–209. Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM. 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–9. Carlsson J, Aarestrup K, Nordwall F, Näslund I, Eriksson T, Carlsson JEL. 2004. Migration of landlocked brown trout in two Scandinavian streams as revealed from trap data. Ecol Freshw Fish 13:161–7. Conlisk E, Motheral S, Chung R, Wisinski C, Endress B. 2014. Using spatially-explicit population models to evaluate habitat restoration plans for the San Diego cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis). Biol Conserv 175:42–51. Crouzeilles R, Prevedello JA, Figueiredo MSL, Lorini ML, Grelle CEV. 2014. The effects of the number, size and isolation of patches along a gradient of native vegetation cover: how can we increment habitat availability? Landscape Ecol 29:479–89. Dietrich AL, Lind L, Nilsson C, Jansson R. 2014. The use of phytometers for evaluating restoration effects on riparian soil fertility. J Environ Qual 43:1916–25. Dynesius M, Jansson R, Johansson ME, Nilsson C. 2004. Intercontinental similarities in riparian-plant diversity and sensitivity to river regulation. Ecol Appl 14:173–91. Dynesius M, Nilsson C. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–62. Elosegi A, Diez J, Mutz M. 2010. Effects of hydromorphological integrity on biodiversity and functioning of river ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 657:199–215. Engström J, Nilsson C, Jansson R. 2009. Effects of stream restoration on dispersal of plant propagules. J Appl Ecol 46:397–405. Fryirs K, Brierley G. 2000. A geomorphic approach to the identification of river recovery potential. Phys Geogr 21:244–77. Fryirs K, Chessman B, Rutherfurd I. 2013. Progress, problems and prospects in Australian river repair. Mar Freshw Res 64:642–54. Gardeström J, Holmqvist D, Polvi LE, Nilsson C. 2013. Demonstration restoration measures in tributaries of the Vindel river catchment. Ecology and Society 18(3):8. doi:10.5751/ES-05609-180308. Göthe E, Timmermann A, Januschke K, Baattrup-Pedersen A. 2016. Structural and functional responses of floodplain vegetation to stream restoration. Hydrobiologia 769:79–92. Gowan C, Fausch KK. 1996. Long-term demographic responses of trout populations to habitat manipulation in six Colorado streams. Ecol Appl 6:931–46. Gustafson EJ, Gardner RH. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94–107. Hanski I. 2000. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Ann Zool Fenn 37:271–80. Harms RS, Hiebert RD. 2006. Vegetation response following invasive tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) removal and implications for riparian restoration. Restor Ecol 14:461–72. Hasselquist EM, Nilsson C, Hjältén J, Jørgensen D, Lind L, Polvi LE. 2015. Time for recovery of riparian plants in restored northern Swedish streams: a chronosequence study. Ecol Appl 25:1373–89. Helfield JM, Capon SJ, Nilsson C, Jansson R, Palm D. 2007. Restoration of rivers used for timber floating: effects on riparian plant diversity. Ecol Appl 17:840–51. Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA. 2011. Intervention ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 61:442–50. Jähnig SC, Brabec K, Buffagni A, Erba S, Lorenz AW, Ofenbock T, Verdonschot PFM, Hering D. 2010. A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. J Appl Ecol 47:671–80. Jiménez MN, Spotswood EN, Cañadas EM, Navarro FB. 2015. Stand management to reduce fire risk promotes understorey plant diversity and biomass in a semi-arid Pinus halepensis plantation. Appl Veg Sci 18:467–80. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 106:110–27. Kail J, Hering D, Muhar S, Gerhard M, Preis S. 2007. The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. J Appl Ecol 44:1145–55. Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Donath TW, Rasran L, Hölzel N. 2010. Species introduction in restoration projects: evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 11:285–99. Kolz AL. 2006. Electrical conductivity as applied to electrofishing. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:509–18. Kondolf GM, Micheli ER. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environ Manage 19:1–15. Krause B, Culmsee H. 2013. The significance of habitat continuity and current management on the compositional and functional diversity of grasslands in the uplands of Lower Saxony, Germany. Flora 208:299–311. Kundzewicz ZW, Kanae S, Seneviratne SI, Handmer J, Nicholls N, Peduzzi P, Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Arnell N, Mach K, Muir-Wood R, Brakenridge GR, Kron W, Benito G, Honda Y, Takahashi K, Sherstyukov B. 2014. Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Hydrol Sci J 59:1–28. Lake PS, Bond N, Reich P. 2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshw Biol 52:597–615. Lambeck K, Smither C, Johnston P. 1998. Sea-level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity for northern Europe. Geophys J Int 134:102–44. Lepori F, Gaul D, Palm D, Malmqvist B. 2006. Food-web responses to restoration of channel heterogeneity in boreal streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2478–86. Lepori F, Palm D, Brännäs E, Malmqvist B. 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl 15:2060–71. Lind L, Nilsson C. 2015. Vegetation patterns in small boreal streams relate to ice and winter floods. J Ecol 103:431–40. Lind L, Nilsson C, Polvi LE, Weber C. 2014a. The role of ice dynamics in shaping vegetation in flowing waters. Biol Rev 89:791–804. Lind L, Nilsson C, Weber C. 2014b. Effects of ice and floods on vegetation in streams in cold regions: implications for climate change. Ecol Evol 4:4173–84. Loke LHL, Ladle RJ, Bouma TJ, Todd PA. 2015. Creating complex habitats for restoration and reconciliation. Ecol Eng 77:307–13. Lotsari E, Wang Y, Kaartinen H, Jaakkola A, Kukko A, Vaaja M, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Alho P. 2015. Gravel transport by ice in a subarctic river from accurate laser scanning. Geomorphology 246:113–22. Louhi P, Mykrä H, Paavola R, Huusko A, Vehanen T, Mäki-Petäys A, Muotka T. 2011. Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecol Appl 21:1950–61. Merritt DM, Nilsson C, Jansson R. 2010. Consequences of propagule dispersal and river fragmentation for riparian plant community diversity and turnover. Ecol Monogr 80:609–26. Molau U, Larsson EL. 2000. Seed rain and seed bank along an alpine altitudinal gradient in Swedish Lapland. Can J Bot 78:728–47. Mouquet N, Loreau M. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–57. Muotka T, Paavola R, Haapala A, Novikmec M, Laasonen P. 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biol Conserv 105:243–53. Naiman RJ, Décamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–58. Naiman RJ, Décamps H, McClain ME. 2005. Riparia: ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. New York: Elsevier. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 85:935–56. Nilsson C, Aradottir AL, Hagen D, Halldórsson G, Høegh K, Mitchell RJ, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Svavarsdóttir K, Tolvanen A, Wilson SD. 2016. Evaluating the process of ecological restoration. Ecol Soc 21(1):41. doi:10.5751/ES-08289-210141. Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM. 2010. The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biol Rev 85:837–58. Nilsson C, Ekblad A, Dynesius M, Backe S, Gardfjell M, Carlberg B, Hellqvist S, Jansson R. 1994. Comparison of species richness and traits of riparian plants between a main river channel and its tributaries. J Ecol 82:281–95. Nilsson C, Lepori F, Malmqvist B, Törnlund E, Hjerdt N, Helfield JM, Palm D, Östergren J, Jansson R, Brännäs E, Lundqvist H. 2005a. Forecasting environmental responses to restoration of rivers used as log floatways: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 8:779–800. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. 2005b. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–8. Nilsson C, Polvi LE, Gardeström J, Hasselquist EM, Lind L, Sarneel JM. 2015. Riparian and in-stream restoration of boreal streams and rivers: success or failure? Ecohydrology 8:753–64. Nungesser M, Saunders C, Coronado-Molina C, Obeysekera J, Johnson J, McVoy C, Benscoter B. 2015. Potential effects of climate change on Florida’s Everglades. Environ Manage 55:824–35. Palm D, Brännäs E, Nilsson K. 2009. Predicting site-specific overwintering of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) using a habitat suitability index. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:540–6. Palm D, Brännäs E, Lepori F, Nilsson K, Stridsman S. 2007. The influence of spawning habitat restoration on juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) density. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:509–15. Palmer MA. 2009. Reforming watershed restoration: science in need of application and applications in need of science. Estuaries Coasts 32:1–17. Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL. 1997. Ecological theory and restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 5:291–300. Palmer MA, Filoso S, Fanelli RM. 2014a. From ecosystems to ecosystem services: stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 65:62–70. Palmer MA, Hondula KL, Koch BJ. 2014b. Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:247–69. Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E. 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55(Supplement 1):205–22. Pander J, Geist J. 2013. Ecological indicators for stream restoration success. Ecol Ind 30:106–18. Persson PE, Jonsson M. 1997. Nationalälv, naturreservat: Vindelälven. Umeå: County Administrative Board of Västerbotten. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. 2015. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-120. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Polvi LE, Nilsson C, Hasselquist EM. 2014. Potential and actual geomorphic complexity of restored headwater streams in northern Sweden. Geomorphology 210:98–118. Power G. 1993. Estimating production, food supplies and consumption by juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 118:163–74. Prowse TD. 1995. River ice processes. In: Beltaos S, Ed. River ice jams. Highlands Ranch, Colorado: Water Resources Publications, LLC. p 29–70. Riis T. 2008. Dispersal and colonisation of plants in lowland streams: success rates and bottlenecks. Hydrobiologia 596:341–51. RiverWiki. 2014. Restoring Europe’s rivers. URL: https://restorerivers.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page. Accessed 16 September 2015. Roni P, Pess G, Beechie T, Morley S. 2010. Estimating changes in coho salmon and steelhead abundance from watershed restoration: how much restoration is needed to measurably increase smolt production? North Am J Fish Manag 30:1469–84. Rosenfeld J, Hogan D, Palm D, Lundquist H, Nilsson C, Beechie TJ. 2011. Contrasting landscape influences on sediment supply and stream restoration priorities in northern Fennoscandia (Sweden and Finland) and coastal British Columbia. Environ Manage 47:28–39. Sarneel JM, Kardol P, Nilsson C. 2016. The importance of priority effects for riparian plant community dynamics. J Veg Sci 27:658–67. Simenstad C, Reed D, Ford M. 2006. When is restoration not? Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecol Eng 26:27–39. SMHI. 2010. Sveriges vattendrag. Faktablad nr 44. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden. SMHI. 2013. URL: http://www.smhi.se/klimatdata. Stickler M, Alfredsen KT. 2005. Factors controlling anchor ice formation in two Norwegian rivers. In: Proceedings of the 13th workshop on the hydraulics of ice covered rivers. CGU HS Committee on River Ice Processes and the Environment, Hanover, New Hampshire. Stickler M, Alfredsen KT. 2009. Anchor ice formation in streams: a field study. Hydrol Process 23:2307–15. Suding KN. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures and opportunities ahead. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:465–87. Sundermann A, Stoll A, Haase P. 2011. River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Ecol Appl 21:1962–71. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92. Timalsina N. 2014. Ice conditions in Norwegian rivers regulated for hydropower: an assessment in the current and future climate. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU. Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Sundermann A, Haase P. 2014. Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates. Freshw Biol 59:1843–55. Törnlund E, Östlund L. 2002. The floating of timber in northern Sweden: construction of floatways and transformation of rivers. Environmental History 8:85–106. Townsend CR, Hildrew AG. 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshw Biol 31:265–75. Turcotte B, Morse B. 2013. A global river ice classification model. J Hydrol 507:134–48. Turcotte B, Morse B, Bergeron NE, Roy AG. 2011. Sediment transport in ice-affected rivers. J Hydrol 409:561–77. van Dijk J, Stroetenga M, van Bodegom PM, Aerts R. 2007. The contribution of rewetting to vegetation restoration of degraded peat meadows. Appl Veg Sci 10:315–24. Ward JV, Tockner K. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshw Biol 46:807–19. Weber C, Nilsson C, Lind L, Alfredsen K, Polvi LE. 2013. Winter disturbance and riverine fish in temperate and cold regions. Bioscience 63:199–210. Wohl E, Lane SN, Wilcox AC. 2015. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour Res 51:5974–97. Woodward G, Gessner MO, Giller PS, Gulis V, Hladyz S, Lecerf A, Malmqvist B, McKie BG, Tiegs SD, Cariss H, Dobson M, Elosegi A, Ferreira V, Graça MAS, Fleituch T, Lacoursière JO, Nistorescu M, Pozo J, Risnoveanu G, Schindler M, Vadineanu A, Vought LB-M, Chauvet E. 2012. Continental-scale effects of nutrient pollution on stream ecosystem functioning. Science 336:1438–40. Zedler JB. 2010. How frequent storms affect wetland vegetation: a preview of climate-change impacts. Front Ecol Environ 8:540–7. Zedler JB, Callaway JC. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7:69–73. Zippin C. 1956. An evaluation of the removal method of estimating animal populations. Biometrics 12:163–89.