Làm Thế Nào Quyết Định Đạo Đức Có Thể Dẫn Đến Hành Vi Đạo Đức? Vai Trò Điều Tiết Của Danh Tính Đạo Đức

Journal of Business Ethics - Tập 137 - Trang 537-549 - 2015
Zhi Xing Xu1,2, Hing Keung Ma2
1Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
2Department of Education Studies & Center for Child Development, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China

Tóm tắt

Đạo đức học và chủ nghĩa vị lợi là hai nguyên tắc đối lập hướng dẫn phán xét đạo đức của chúng ta. Gần đây, người ta cho rằng đạo đức học mang tính trực giác và dựa trên một cách tiếp cận dễ mắc sai lầm và thiên lệch, trong khi chủ nghĩa vị lợi thì phản ánh tương đối và là khuôn khổ phù hợp để đưa ra quyết định. Trong nghiên cứu này, các tác giả đã khám phá mối quan hệ giữa danh tính đạo đức, quyết định đạo đức và hành vi đạo đức để thấy cách mà sự ưa chuộng giải pháp theo đạo đức học có thể dẫn đến hành vi đạo đức. Ở nghiên cứu 1, một khảo sát trực tuyến cho thấy rằng khi đưa ra quyết định, những cá nhân coi mình là người đạo đức thì thường ưa chuộng lý tưởng theo đạo đức học hơn là khuôn khổ theo chủ nghĩa vị lợi. Ở nghiên cứu 2, các tác giả đã điều tra tác động của danh tính đạo đức và quyết định đạo đức đối với hành vi đạo đức trong một nghiên cứu thực nghiệm. Các kết quả cho thấy rằng khi đạo đức học kết hợp với sức mạnh động viên của danh tính đạo đức, thì cá nhân có khả năng hành xử một cách đạo đức cao nhất.

Từ khóa

#Đạo đức học #chủ nghĩa vị lợi #danh tính đạo đức #hành vi đạo đức #quyết định đạo đức

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A, I. I., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123. Aquino, K., & Reed, A, I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423. Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2009). Protected values and omission bias as deontological judgments. In D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 50, pp. 133–167). San Diego: Elsevier. Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121(1), 154–161. Batson, C. D., & Thompson, E. R. (2001). Why don’t moral people act morally? Motivational considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 54–57. Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (1973). The utilitarians. New York: Anchor Books. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 1. Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 128–139). Wiley, New York. Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 927–940. Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1992). Social understanding, self-understanding, and morality. In M. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed., pp. 421–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum. Davies, M. F., French, C. C., & Keogh, E. (1998). Self-deceptive enhancement and impression management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions. The Journal of Psychology, 132(4), 401–406. FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L., Navrady, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123(3), 434–441. Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203. Gosling, S., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. (2004). Should we trust Web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. Greene, J. D., & Paxton, J. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(30), 12506–12511. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 205–213. Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48(4), 232–256. Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some” activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 218–243. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. Kant, I. (1994). Ethical philosophy (2nd ed.; J. W. Ellington, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1785). Kant, I. (1996). The Metaphysics of Morals, translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Knox, D., Schacht, C., Holt, J., & Turner, J. (1993). Sexual lies among university students. College Student Journal, 27, 269. Knutson, K. M., Krueger, F., Koenigs, M., Hawley, A., Escobedo, J. R., Vasudeva, V., & Grafman, J. (2010). Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 378–384. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Chicago: Rand McNally. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper & Row. Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg’s model. Psychological Review, 112(3), 629. Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2004). A social-cognitive approach to the moral personality. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self and identity (pp. 189–212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Ma, H. J., Wan, G., & Lu, E. Y. (2008). Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 197–203. Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D. K., Hagele, S., & Lasky, B. (2006). Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 966–985. Piaget, J. (1965). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. In Educational psychology in context: Readings for future teachers (pp. 98–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pugh, G. E. (1977). The biological origin of human values. New York: Basic Books. Qian, M., Wu, Q., Zhu, R., & Zhang, S. (2000). Development of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire short scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32(3), 317–323. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. Reed II, A., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(6), 1270. Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178–193. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory (pp. 89–119). New York: Praeger. Reynolds, S. J. (2003). Perceptions of organizational ethicality: Do inflated perceptions of self lead to inflated perceptions of the organization? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 253–266. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233. Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1027. Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1190–1207. Schminke, M., & Wells, D. (1999). Group processes and performance and their effects on individuals’ ethical frameworks. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(4), 367–381. Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 513–540. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3. Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4), 531–541. Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2014). Does Honesty Result from Moral Will or Moral Grace? Why Moral Identity Matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14. Zhou, Z., Zhang, Q., Su, C., & Zhou, N. (2012). How do brand communities generate brand relationships? Intermediate mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 890–895.