Housing Ex-Offenders in the Netherlands: Balancing Neighbourhood Safety and Human Rights
Tóm tắt
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognises stable housing as a prerequisite for an adequate standard of living. A home provides shelter and enables personal development, thus contributing to the individual’s well-being. Despite this, however, many struggle to find a place to live. In the Netherlands, people with a history of criminal or anti-social behaviour (‘ex-offenders’) are among those whose search for housing is most problematic. They are sometimes viewed as unreliable tenants or denied access to housing out of fear for recidivism. At the same time, Dutch local authorities—responsible for maintaining public order—may (aim to) prevent an ex-offender from (re) settling in their municipality. Recent legislation in the Netherlands furthermore allows local authorities to screen and exclude people from certain urban areas based on their past behaviour. How do Dutch private and administrative actors decide between ex-offenders’ housing rights on the one hand and other persons’ (feelings of) safety and public order on the other? And how do the laws and policies in the Netherlands concerning the housing of ex-offenders relate to the state’s human rights obligations? Using doctrinal legal research methods and applying a normative, human rights framework, this paper concludes that while there are no out-right violations of fundamental rights and freedoms, several approaches in the Netherlands do appear to be problematic and at odds with international obligations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, K. D. (2009). Do we need a right to housing? Nevada Law Journal, 9(2), 275–324.
Alfredsson, G. S., & Eide, A. (1999). The universal declaration of human rights: A common standard of achievement. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Baldry, E., McDonnell, D., Maplesston, P., & Peeters, M. (2006). Ex-prisoners, homelessness and the state in Australia. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(1), 20–33.
Boone, M. M., Van de Bunt, H. G., & Siegel, D. (2014). Gevangene van het verleden. Crisissituaties na de terugkeer van zedendelinquenten in de samenleving. Amsterdam: Reed Business.
Bradley, K. H., Micheal Oliver, R. B., Richardson, N. C., & Slayter, E. M. (2001). No place like home: Housing and the ex-prisoner. Boston: Community Resources for Justice.
Bröring, H. E., & Keulen, B. F. (2017). Bestraffende sancties in het strafrecht en het bestuursrecht. Paris: Zutphen.
Bruijn, L. M., Vols, M., & Brouwer, J. G. (2018). Home closure as a weapon in the Dutch war on drugs: Does judicial review function as a safety net? International Journal of Drug Policy, 51, 137–147.
Bushway, S. D., Stoll, M. A., & Weiman, D. F. (2007). Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cain, H. L. (2003). Housing our criminals: Finding housing for the offender in the twenty-first century. Golden Gate University Law Review, 33(2), 131–171.
Carey, A. (2004). No second chance: People with criminal records denied access to public housing. New York: Human Rights Watch.
CESCR (UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), General Comment No. 4: The Right to Adequate Housing (Art. 11 (1) of the Covenant), 13 December 1991, E/1992/23.
Clark, L. M. (2007). Landlord attitudes toward renting to released offenders. Federal Probation, 71(1).
Council of Europe. (2008). Housing policy and vulnerable social groups. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Crowell, H. (2017). A home of One’s own: The fight against illegal housing discrimination based on criminal convictions, and those who are still left behind. Texas Law Review, 95(5), 1103–1144.
Crowther, C. (2007). An introduction to criminology and criminal justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dirkzwager, A., Blokland, A., Nannes, K., & Vroonland, M. (2015). Effecten van detentie op het vinden van werk en een woning. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 57(1), 5–30.
Doff, W. (2013). Rotterdam zet symboolpolitiek door. Tijdschrift voor de Volkshuisvesting, 2013(5), 6–16.
Duivesteijn, A. (2005). De Rotterdamwet deugt niet. S&D, 2005(10).
Elbers, J. M., Weggemans, D., & Liem, M. C. A. (2016). Op Vrije Voeten: Herintreding van Maatschappelijk Gevoelige Ex-gedetineerden. The Hague: Campus Den Haag.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gemeente Rotterdam (2003). Rotterdam zet door. Op weg naar een stad in balans. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
Hobbes, T. (1981). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.
Hochstenbach, C., Uitermark, J., & Van Gent, W. (2015). Evaluatie effecten Wet bijzondere maatregelen grootstedelijke problematiek (“Rotterdamwet”) in Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research.
Hohmann, J. (2013). The right to housing. Law, concepts, possibilities. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
HRC (UN Human Rights Committee), CCPR General Comment No. 27: Article 12 (Freedom of Movement), 2 November 1999, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9.
Huls, C. E., & Brouwer, J. G. (2013). De terugkeer van zedendelinquenten in de wijk. Amsterdam: Reed Business.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1).
Kenna, P. (2008). Housing rights: Positive duties and enforceable rights at the European court of human rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 13(2), 193–208.
Klein, S. R. (1999). Redrawing the criminal-civil boundary. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 2(2), 681–723.
Kucs, A., Sedlova, Z., & Pierhurovica, L. (2008). The right to housing: International, European and National Perspectives. Cuadernos Constitucionales de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol, 64(65), 101–123.
Lammar-Heindel, C.S. (2012). Does the state have moral duties? State duty-claims and the possibility of institutionally held moral obligations. Iowa Research Online. https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3388&context=etd. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.
Lindesmith, A. R., & Warren Dunham, H. (1941). Some principles of criminal typology. Social Forces, 19(3).
Locke, J. (1993). The second treatise of government. London: Everyman.
Mann, K. (1992). Punitive civil sanctions: The Middleground between criminal and civil law. The Yale Law Journal, 101(8).
Metraux, S., & Culhane, D. P. (2004). Homeless shelter use and incarceration following prison release. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(2), 139–160.
Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J. B., & Tangney, J. P. (2016). The effect of stigma on criminal offenders’ functioning: A longitudinal Mediational model. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 196–218.
More, A., & Weijters, G. (2011). Detentie en de ongewenste gevolgen voor inkomen en huisvesting van gedetineerden. PROCES, 90(1).
Nelson, M., Dees, P., & Allen, C. (2011). The first month out: Post-incarceration experiences in New York City. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 24(1).
OHCHR (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), Fact Sheet No. 21, The Human Right to Adequate Housing 2009, Fact Sheet No. 21/Rev.1.
Olds, K. (2010). The role of courts in making the right to housing a reality throughout Europe: Lessons from France and the Netherlands. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 28(1).
Rainey, B., Wicks, E., & Ovey, C. (2017). Jacobs, white, and Ovey: The European convention on human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rechtspraak (2017). Kengetallen gerechten 2017, via https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie-en-contact/Organisatie/Raad-voor-de-rechtspraak/Jaardocumenten. Accessed 8 Sept 2019.
Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2006). Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 389–418.
Rousseau, J. (2003). On the social contract. Mineola: Dover Publications.
Tyler, T. R. (2017). Methodology in legal research. Utrecht Law Review, 13(2).
Van der Vorm, B. (2018). Rechtsbescherming tegen de cumulatie van privaatrechtelijke en strafrechtelijke gebiedsverboden. Juridische Verkenningen, 2018(2), 41–57.
Van Tongeren, J. H. S., & Vols, M. (2018). The right to housing and the right to a second chance: How Dutch landlords and local authorities facilitate and frustrate the successful reintegration of ex-offenders. In J. Sidoli & M. Vols (Eds.), People and buildings: Comparative housing law (pp. 171–190). Den Haag: Eleven Publishing.
Vols, M. (2015). Artikel 8 EVRM en de gedwongen ontruiming van de huurwoning vanwege overlast. WR, 2015(16), 55–62.
Vols, M. (2019). European law and private evictions: Property, proportionality and vulnerable people. European Review of Private Law, 27(4), 719–752.
Wacks, R. (2017). Understanding jurisprudence. An introduction to legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weijters, G., Rokven, J. J., & Verweij, S. (2018). Monitor nazorg (ex-)gedetineerden – meting 5. Den Haag: WODC.
Zembla (2015). Burenruzie, via https://zembla.bnnvara.nl/nieuws/burenruzie (accessed 8 Sept 2019).