Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals

Mammal Review - Tập 20 Số 2-3 - Trang 97-123 - 1990
Stephen Harris1, Warren Cresswell1, Peter Forde1, W. J. Trewhella1, Tom Woollard1, Stephanie Wray1
1Department of Zoology, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, U.K.

Tóm tắt

AbstractNinety‐three papers on home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data were reviewed; these papers were found in a literature search of 18 of the major journals likely to include such papers, published in the 5‐year period to the end of 1988. The review showed that even 25 years after the first radio‐tracking studies, in the majority of papers there was still insufficient attention given to accurate and sufficient data collection, and to using appropriate and sophisticated analytical techniques to assess home‐range size and configuration. This paper is designed to help people undertaking a radio‐tracking study to avoid some of the most common pitfalls. It is based on some of the problems we have experienced studying several species of larger mammals. We use our collective experience to produce a guide on how to plan a radio‐tracking study, to highlight some of the potential problems in designing the study and collecting the data, and to identify some of the difficulties that may be encountered during the analytical stages. The advantages and disadvantages of the most frequently used methods of home‐range analysis are discussed and methods for determining the minimum number of radio‐fixes and techniques for adjusting inadequate sample sizes are described, as are the problems that may be caused by autocorrelated data.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/3544294

10.2307/1377575

Amlaner C. J., 1980, A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking

10.2307/3809215

10.2307/1937036

10.2307/1381363

Baker R. R., 1978, The Evolutionary Ecology of Animal Migration

10.2307/3801187

10.2307/3808423

10.1016/0022-5193(82)90354-X

10.1038/327149a0

10.2307/1374834

10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80219-6

10.1111/j.1365-2907.1988.tb00071.x

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb05780.x

Cheeseman C. L., 1982, Telemetric studies of vertebrates, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 49, 1

Clutton‐Brock T. H., 1982, Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes

10.2307/3797775

10.1111/j.1365-2907.1988.tb00069.x

10.2307/1381239

Dice L. R., 1953, The statistical concept of home range as applied to the recapture radius of the deermouse (Peromyscus), Contributions of the University of Michigan Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, 62, 1

10.2307/1936821

10.2307/4588

10.2307/1381086

10.1016/0022-5193(79)90366-7

Forde P.(1989)Comparative ecology of muntjacMuntiacus reevesiand roe deerCapreolus capreolusin a commercial coniferous forest.Ph.D. Thesis University of Bristol.

10.2307/3544532

10.2307/3801178

Hanski I. K., 1988, Singing territories and home ranges of breeding chaffinches: visual observation vs. radio‐tracking, Ornisfennica, 65, 97

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50088-9

Harris S., 1982, Activity patterns and habitat utilization of badgers (Meles meles) in suburban Bristol: a radio tracking study, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 49, 301

10.2307/1379334

10.2307/1375189

10.2307/3798367

Hofer H.(1986)Patterns of resource dispersion and exploitation of the red fox(Vulpes vulpes)and the Eurasian badger(Meles meles):a comparative study.D.Phil Thesis University of Oxford.

10.2307/1942661

10.2307/3801761

Jewell P. A., 1966, The concept of home range in mammals, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 18, 85

10.2307/1381665

10.2307/3808537

10.2307/1381666

Kenward R., 1987, Wildlife Radio Tagging: Equipment, Field Techniques and Data Analysis

10.2307/1379578

10.2307/1379608

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03262.x

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50047-6

10.2307/3801763

10.2307/2403607

10.2307/3801498

10.2307/1381051

10.2307/3801604

10.2307/3801792

10.1007/978-1-349-03711-7_20

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50017-8

Macdonald D., 1981, Listening in to wildlife, New Scientist, 89, 466

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50052-X

10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb00124.x

Martin P., 1987, Measuring Behaviour–an Introductory Guide

10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80009-X

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50012-9

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1986.tb03600.x

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb02919.x

10.2307/2421652

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50018-X

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb03751.x

10.2307/3800921

Neft D. S., 1966, Statistical Analysis for Areal Distributions

Newdick M. T.(1983)The behavioural ecology of urban foxes Vulpes vulpes in Oxford.D.Phil Thesis University of Oxford.

10.2307/3801905

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb05066.x

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb04475.x

10.1139/z88-099

Rylands A. B., 1986, Ranging behaviour and habitat preference of a wild marmoset group, Callithrix humeralifer (Callitricidae, Primates), Journal of Zoology, 210, 489, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1986.tb03652.x

10.2307/3801691

10.2307/4373

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50010-5

10.1016/0040-5809(81)90049-6

10.4098/AT.arch.87-36

10.2307/1293348

Southwood T. R. E., 1966, Ecological Methods: with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations

10.2307/3798413

Spencer W. D., 1984, An evaluation of the harmonic mean measure for defining carnivore activity areas, Acta zoologica fennica, 171, 255

10.2307/3808276

10.1007/BF00290821

10.2307/1376067

10.2307/1939170

10.1071/ZO9850705

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50050-6

10.2307/3800474

10.1016/B978-0-08-024928-5.50051-8

10.2307/3801114

10.2307/3800922

Wolton R. J.(1982)The social ecology of the wood mouse(Apodemus sylvaticus).Ph.D. thesis University of Aberdeen.

10.2307/4890

10.1016/0304-3800(87)90101-3

10.2307/1938423