Hindlimb Stretching Alters Locomotor Function After Spinal Cord Injury in the Adult Rat

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair - Tập 29 Số 3 - Trang 268-277 - 2015
Krista L. Caudle1, Darryn A. Atkinson1, Edward H. Brown1, Katie Donaldson1, Erik Seibt1, Tim Chea1, Erin Smith1, Karianne Chung1, Alice Shum-Siu1, Courtney C. Cron1, David S.K. Magnuson1
1University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky., USA

Tóm tắt

Background. Stretching is a widely accepted standard-of-care therapy following spinal cord injury (SCI) that has not been systematically studied in animal models. Objective. To investigate the influence of a daily stretch-based physical therapy program on locomotor recovery in adult rats with moderate T9 contusive SCI. Methods. A randomized treatment and control study of stretching in an animal model of acute SCI. Moderate SCIs were delivered with the NYU Impactor. Daily stretching (30 min/day, 5 days/wk for 8 weeks) was provided by a team of animal handlers. Hindlimb function was assessed using the BBB Open Field Locomotor Scale and kinematically. Passive range-of-motion for each joint was determined weekly using a goniometer. Results. Declines in hindlimb function during overground stepping were observed for the first 4 weeks for stretched animals. BBB scores improved weeks 5 to 10 but remained below the control group. Stretched animals had significant deficits in knee passive range of motion starting at week 4 and for the duration of the study. Kinematic assessment showed decreased joint excursion during stepping that partially recovered beginning at week 5. Conclusion. Stretch-based therapy significantly impaired functional recovery in adult rats with a moderate contusive SCI at T10. The negative impact on function was greatest acutely but persisted even after the stretching ceased at 8 weeks postinjury.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

O’sullivan S, 2001, Phys Ther, 81, 9

10.3233/NRE-2011-0627

10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018334

10.1038/sc.2008.71

10.1038/sj.sc.3101241

10.1053/apmr.2000.9168

10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60237-3

10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00926.x

Williams PE, 1988, J Anat, 158, 109

10.1136/ard.49.5.316

10.2522/ptj.20100265

10.2460/javma.2000.217.43

10.2460/javma.230.3.370

10.1177/1545968311407519

10.1006/exnr.1999.7016

10.1177/1545968308331147

10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.03.008

10.1089/08977150150502613

10.1089/neu.2005.22.214

10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.04.032

10.1089/neu.2005.22.529

10.1089/neu.2006.23.1654

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.029

10.1037/0735-7044.121.1.186

10.1037/0735-7044.121.5.1082

10.1089/neu.2006.23.1261

10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.028

10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014663

10.2519/jospt.1994.20.3.145

Liverman CT, 2005, Spinal Cord Injury: Progress, Promise, and Priorities

10.1249/00005768-199412000-00013

10.1038/nn0909-1077

10.1159/000323676