Higher PUFA andn-3 PUFA, conjugated linoleic acid,α-tocopherol and iron, but lower iodine and selenium concentrations in organic milk: a systematic literature review and meta- and redundancy analyses

British Journal of Nutrition - Tập 115 Số 6 - Trang 1043-1060 - 2016
Dominika Średnicka-Tober1,2, Marcin Barański2, Chris J. Seal3, Roy Sanderson4, Charles Benbrook5, Håvard Steinshamn6, Joanna Gromadzka-Ostrowska7, Ewa Rembiałkowska1, Krystyna Skwarło‐Sońta8, M. D. Eyre2, Giulio Cozzi9, Mette Krogh Larsen10, Teresa Jordon2, U. Niggli11, T. Sakowski12, Philip C. Calder13, Graham C. Burdge13, Smaragda Sotiraki14, Alexandros Stefanakis14, Sokratis Stergiadis2,15, Halil Yolcu16,2, Eleni Chatzidimitriou2, Gillian Butler2, Gavin Stewart2, Carlo Leifert2
1Department of Functional and Organic Food and Commodities, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, Warsaw 02-776, Poland
2Nafferton Ecological Farming Group (NEFG), School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Nafferton Farm, Stocksfield, Northumberland NE43 7XD, UK
3School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Agriculture Building, Kings Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
4School of Biology, Newcastle University, Ridley Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
5Benbrook Consulting Services, 90063 Troy Road, Enterprise, OR 97828, USA
6Food and Agriculture Division-Grassland and Forage, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Gunnars veg 6, N-6630 Tingvoll, Norway
7Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, Warsaw 02-776, Poland
8Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, Warsaw 02-096, Poland
9Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell' Università 19, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
10Department of Food Science-Food Chemistry & Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Building F20/8845, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
11Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, CH-5070 Frick, Switzerland
12Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Science, Jastrzębiec, Postępu 36, Magdalenka 05-552, Poland
13Human Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
14National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF), Veterinary Research Institute of Thessaloniki, Thermi 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece
15School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Dairy Research, Food Production and Quality Division, University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
16Kelkit Aydin Vocational Training School, Gumushane University, 29600 Kelkit, Gumushane, Turkey

Tóm tắt

AbstractDemand for organic milk is partially driven by consumer perceptions that it is more nutritious. However, there is still considerable uncertainty over whether the use of organic production standards affects milk quality. Here we report results of meta-analyses based on 170 published studies comparing the nutrient content of organic and conventional bovine milk. There were no significant differences in total SFA and MUFA concentrations between organic and conventional milk. However, concentrations of total PUFA andn-3 PUFA were significantly higher in organic milk, by an estimated 7 (95 % CI −1, 15) % and 56 (95 % CI 38, 74) %, respectively. Concentrations ofα-linolenic acid (ALA), very long-chainn-3 fatty acids (EPA+DPA+DHA) and conjugated linoleic acid were also significantly higher in organic milk, by an 69 (95 % CI 53, 84) %, 57 (95 % CI 27, 87) % and 41 (95 % CI 14, 68) %, respectively. As there were no significant differences in totaln-6 PUFA and linoleic acid (LA) concentrations, then-6:n-3 and LA:ALA ratios were lower in organic milk, by an estimated 71 (95 % CI −122, −20) % and 93 (95 % CI −116, −70) %. It is concluded that organic bovine milk has a more desirable fatty acid composition than conventional milk. Meta-analyses also showed that organic milk has significantly higherα-tocopherol and Fe, but lower I and Se concentrations. Redundancy analysis of data from a large cross-European milk quality survey indicates that the higher grazing/conserved forage intakes in organic systems were the main reason for milk composition differences.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00394-013-0597-4

10.3168/jds.2012-5765

10.3168/jds.2012-6379

10.1017/S0022029999003805

10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.04.016

10.1071/AR03173

1998, CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4)

10.1080/10408399509527707

10.1080/10408399409527673

2010, EFSA J, 8, 1461, 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1461

10.3168/jds.2006-870

10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

2001, Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:SIIEMA]2.0.CO;2

2005, Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis, 1

2013, Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution, 89, 10.1515/9781400846184-010

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2

2001, Practical Meta-Analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series

2010, International Encyclopedia of Education, 274

1985, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis

2010, J Stat Softw, 36, 1

2013, Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 10.1515/9781400846184-003

10.1098/rsbl.2009.0546

10.1017/S0007114514001366

2005, Am J Clin Nutr, 82, 388, 10.1093/ajcn/82.2.388

10.1021/jf301053b

10.1210/er.2009-0011

10.3168/jds.2009-2953

10.3168/jds.2008-1392

10.1111/j.1365-2265.1988.tb01204.x

10.1002/jsfa.3504

2001, Rev Environ Health, 16, 233

10.1002/jsfa.3235

2012, Acta Agric. Scand A Anim Sci, 62, 127

10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60693-4

10.1080/10408690490468489

10.3168/jds.2014-8389

10.1371/journal.pone.0082429

10.1016/j.njas.2011.04.002

10.1021/jf4008967

10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.02.009

2007, Am J Clin Nutr, 85, 1203, 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1203

10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.050

2001, Nutr Res Rev, 14, 153

10.1186/1743-7075-12-4

2015, Environ Health Perspect

10.1263/jbb.100.152

10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.116

10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.021302.121842

2008, Br J Nutr, 99, 598, 10.1017/S0007114507815844

10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00770.x

10.1016/j.plefa.2010.02.007

10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00253-6

10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132106

10.1194/jlr.M006866

10.3945/ajcn.2010.29457

2007, Am J Clin Nutr, 86, 929, 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.929

10.1146/annurev-food-022510-133734

10.1007/s00394-009-0002-5

10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.01.001

10.1080/07315724.2001.10719008

10.1079/PNS2005473

10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007

10.1017/S0029665108005983

10.1002/jsfa.5639

2007, Handbook of Organic Food Safety and Quality

10.1111/cea.12111

10.1080/07352689.2011.554417

10.1017/S0029665110001552

10.3945/ajcn.2009.28041

10.1016/j.plefa.2009.01.004

10.1051/rnd:2005047

1994, Biochim Biophys Acta, 4, 277

10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00036-0

10.1093/jnci/djt174

10.3390/nu5041081

10.1159/000073788

2011, Animal Nutrition

10.1021/jf302931z

2013, EFSA J, 11, 3100, 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3100

10.1186/1476-511X-6-25

10.1017/S0007114511003059

10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00627.x

2013, EFSA J, 11, 3130, 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3130

10.1080/03601234.2010.502394

10.1021/jf020942i

10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05404-6

2007, Handbook of Organic Food Quality and Safety, 74

10.1079/RAF2005113

10.1093/aje/kwr027

10.3390/nu5083184