High sensitivity and interindividual variability in the response of the human circadian system to evening light

Andrew J. K. Phillips1, Parisa Vidafar1, A Burns1, Elise M. McGlashan1, Clare Anderson1, Shantha M. W. Rajaratnam1, Steven W. Lockley1, Sean W. Cain1
1Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Tóm tắt

Significance Electric lighting has fundamentally altered how the human circadian clock synchronizes to the day/night cycle. Exposure to light after dusk is pervasive in the modern world. We examined group-level sensitivity of the circadian system to evening light and the degree to which sensitivity varies between individuals. We found that, on average, humans are highly sensitive to evening light. Specifically, 50% suppression of melatonin occurred at <30 lux, which is comparable to or lower than typical indoor lighting used at night, as well as light produced by electronic devices. Significantly, there was a >50-fold difference in sensitivity to evening light across individuals. Interindividual differences in light sensitivity may explain differential vulnerability to circadian disruption and subsequent impact on human health.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/978-1-4612-6142-1

10.1038/379540a0

E. B. Klerman, D. J. Dijk, R. E. Kronauer, C. A. Czeisler, Simulations of light effects on the human circadian pacemaker: Implications for assessment of intrinsic period. Am. J. Physiol. 270, R271–R282 (1996).

10.1126/science.284.5423.2177

10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00695.x

10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.046

10.1177/0748730415590702

10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.039

10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.041

10.1002/ajpa.23160

10.1038/srep14074

10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50171.x

10.1177/0748730406297780

10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00970.x

10.1152/japplphysiol.00165.2011

10.1073/pnas.1418490112

10.1055/s-2007-1011846

10.1007/978-1-4615-3756-4_35

10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.037

10.1210/jc.2010-2098

10.1371/journal.pone.0096532

10.1113/JP275917

10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.10.004

10.1016/0006-8993(88)90820-7

10.1038/srep45158

10.1177/0748730417699310

10.1046/j.0962-1105.2003.00369.x

10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00532.x

10.1177/0748730410369208

10.1073/pnas.1010666108

10.1081/CBI-100103190

10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb11815.x

10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00018-4

10.1111/j.1601-5215.2009.00416.x

10.1016/0140-6736(90)92202-S

10.1371/journal.pone.0204621

10.3389/fneur.2018.01022

10.5665/sleep.5858

10.1016/j.psychres.2013.05.023

10.1111/jpi.12562

10.1007/s00213-018-5019-0

10.1152/japplphysiol.01413.2009

10.1177/0748730415585413

10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80350-5

10.1038/nature01761

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1321-12.2012

10.1016/j.tins.2013.10.004

10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00236-9

10.1371/journal.pone.0085837