High-resolution PIV measurements of a transitional shock wave–boundary layer interaction
Tóm tắt
This study investigates the effects of boundary layer transition on an oblique shock wave reflection. The Mach number was 1.7, the unit Reynolds number was 35 × 106 m−1, and the pressure ratio over the interaction was 1.35. Particle image velocimetry is used as the main flow diagnostics tool, supported by oil-flow and Schlieren visualizations. At these conditions, the thickness of the laminar boundary layer is only 0.2 mm, and seeding proved to be problematic as practically no seeding was recorded in the lower 40 % of the boundary layer. The top 60 % could, however, still be resolved with good accuracy and is found to be in good agreement with the compressible Blasius solution. Due to the effects of turbulent mixing, the near-wall seeding deficiency disappears when the boundary layer transitions to a turbulent state. This allowed the seeding distribution to be used as an indicator for the state of the boundary layer, permitting to obtain an approximate intermittency distribution for the boundary layer transition region. This knowledge was then used for positioning the oblique shock wave in the laminar, transitional (50 % intermittency) or turbulent region of the boundary layer. Separation is only recorded for the laminar and transitional interactions. For the laminar interaction, a large separation bubble is found, with a streamwise length of 96
$$\delta_{i,0}^*$$
. The incoming boundary layer is lifted over the separation bubble and remains in a laminar state up to the impingement point of the shock wave. After the shock, transition starts and a turbulent profile is reached approximately 80–90
$$\delta_{i,0}^*$$
downstream of the shock. Under the same shock conditions, the transitional interaction displays a smaller separation bubble (43
$$\delta_{i,0}^*$$
), and transition is found to be accelerated over the separation bubble.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Astarita T (2007) Analysis of weighting windows for image deformation methods in PIV. Exp Fluids 43(6):859–872
Auton TR (1987) The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow. J Fluid Mech 183:199–218
Babinsky H, Harvey JK (2011) Shock wave–boundary-layer interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bestion D, Gaviglio J, Bonnet JP (1983) Comparison between constant-current and constant-temperature hot-wire anemometers in highspeed flows. Rev Sci Instrum 54(11):1513–1524
Chapman DR, Kuehn DM, Larson HK (1958) Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. Technical Report NACA report 1356
Clemens NT, Narayanaswamy V (2014) Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:469–492
Dhawan S, Narasimha R (1958) Some properties of boundary layer flow during the transition from laminar to turbulent motion. J Fluid Mech 3(4):418–436
Dolling DS (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39(8):1517–1531
Duan L, Choudhari MM, Wu M (2014) Numerical study of acoustic radiation due to a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 746:165–192
Erdem E, Kontis K, Johnstone E, Murray NP, Steelant J (2013) Experiments on transitional shock wave–boundary layer interactions at Mach 5. Exp Fluids 54(10):1–22. doi:10.1007/s00348-013-1598-z
Gadd GE, Holder DW, Regan JD (1954) An experimental investigation of the interaction between shock waves and boundary layers. Proc R Soc Lond A 226(1165):227–253
Giepman RHM, Schrijer FFJ, Van Oudheusden BW (2015) Infrared thermography measurements on a moving boundary layer transition front in supersonic flow. AIAA J. doi:10.2514/1.J053910
Groot KJ, Pinna F, Van Oudheusden BW (2014) On closing the streamwise BiGlobal stability problem: the effect of boundary conditions. In: IUTAM-ABCM symposium on laminar–turbulent transition, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Hakkinen RJ, Greber I, Trilling L, Abarbanel SS (1959) The interaction of an oblique shock wave with a laminar boundary layer. NASA Memo 2-18-59W
Illingworth CR (1950) Some solutions of the equations of flow of a viscous compressible fluid. Proc Camb Philos Soc 46:469–478
Katzer E (1989) On the lengthscales of laminar shock/boundary layer interaction. J Fluid Mech 206:477–496
Laufer J (1961) Aerodynamic noise in supersonic wind tunnels. J Aerosp Sci 28(9):685–692
Laufer J (1964) Some statistical properties of the pressure field radiated by a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 7(8):1191–1197
Le Balleur J-C, Délery J (1973) Etude expérimentale de l’effet de la réflexion d’une onde de choc sur la transition de la couche-limite. Congrès Français de Mécanique, Poitiers (France), 17–20 Sept 1973
Lees L, Reeves BL (1964) Supersonic separated and reattaching laminar flows: I. General theory and application to adiabatic boundary-layer/shock-wave interactions. AIAA J 2:1907–1920
Mayle RE (1991) The role of laminar–turbulent transition in gas turbine engines. J Turbomach 113(4):509–536
Meinhart CD, Wereley ST, Santiago JG (2000) A PIV algorithm for estimating time-averaged velocity fields. J Fluids Eng 122(June):285–289
Meunier P, Leweke T (2003) Analysis and treatment of errors due to high velocity gradients in particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 35(5):408–421
Narasimha R (1957) On the distribution of intermittency in the transition region of a boundary layer. J Aeronaut Sci 24:711–712
Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin
Ragni D, Schrijer FFJ, Van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2010) Particle tracer response across shocks measured by PIV. Exp Fluids 50(1):53–64
Samimy M, Lele SK (1991) Motion of particles with inertia in a compressible free shear layer. Phys Fluids A 3(8):1915–1923
Sansica A, Sandham ND, Hu ZW (2014) Forced response of a laminar shock-induced separation bubble. Phys Fluids 26(093601):1–14
Scarano F (2008) Overview of PIV in supersonic flows. In: Schroeder A, Willert CE (eds) Particle image velocimetry, topics in applied physics, vol 112, pp 445–463
Scarano F, Riethmuller ML (2000) Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing. Exp Fluids 29:S51–S60
Scharnowski S, Hain R, Kähler CJ (2012) Reynolds stress estimation up to single-pixel resolution using PIV-measurements. Exp Fluids 52:985–1002
Teramoto S (2005) Large-eddy simulation of transitional boundary layer with impinging shock wave. AIAA J 43(11):2354–2363
Theunissen R, Scarano F, Riethmuller ML (2008) On improvement of PIV image interrogation near stationary interfaces. Exp Fluids 45:557–572
Van Driest ER (1951) Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids. J Aeronaut Sci 18:145–160
Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39(6):1096–1100