Heuristieken, vertekeningen en het klinisch-diagnostische proces

Arkes, H.R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 323–330.

Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486–498.

Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., & Hart, K. (1988). Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 305–307.

Arkes, H. R., & Harkness, A. R. (1980). Effect of making a diagnosis on subsequent recognition of symptoms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 568–575.

Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bell, I., & Mellor, D. (2009). Clinical judgments: Research and practice. Australian Psychologist, 44, 112–121.

Croskerry, P. (2003) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780.

Croskerry, P., Singhal, G., & Mamede, S. (2013a). Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ quality & safety, 22, ii58–ii64.

Croskerry, P., Singhal, G., & Mamede, S. (2013b). Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ quality & safety, 22, ii65–ii72.

Dawes, R. M. (1986). Representative thinking in clinical judgment. Clinical Psychology Review, 6, 424–441.

Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.

Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge University Press.

Elstein, A. S. (2009). Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Advances in health sciences education, 14, 7–18.

Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). Cambridge University Press

Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 35–42.

Galanter, C. A., & Patel, V. L. (2005). Medical decision making: a selective review for child psychiatrists and psychologists. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 675–689.

Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Garb, H.N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 67–89.

Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological review, 102, 684–704.

Goldberg, L. R. (1965). Diagnosticians vs. diagnostic signs: The diagnosis of psychosis vs. neurosis from the MMPI. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, 1–28.

Goldberg, L. R. (1968). Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. American Psychologist, 23, 483–496.

Goldberg, L. R. (1970). Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences. Psychological bulletin, 73, 422–432.

Graber, M. L., Kissam, S., Payne, V. L., Meyer, A. N., Sorensen, A., Lenfestey, N., & Singh, H. (2012). Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21, 535–557.

Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-analternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1069–1086.

Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.

Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47, 1231–1243.

Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 379–383.

Mumma, G. H., & Wilson, S. B. (1995). Procedural debiasing of primacy/anchoring effects in linical-like judgments. Journal of clinical psychology, 51, 841–853.

Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142–1150.

Pfeiffer, A.M., Whelan, J.P., & Martin, J.M. (2000). Decision-making bias in psychotherapy: Effects of hypothesis source and accountability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 429–436.

Rueter, M. A., Chao, W., & Conger, R. D. (2000). The effect of systematic variation in retrospective conduct disorder reports on antisocial personality disorder diagnoses. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68, 307–312.

Wedding, D., & Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision making in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 233–265.

Westenberg, M., & P. Koele (1993) Klinische besliskunde. In P. Koele en J. van der Pligt (red.). Beslissen en beoordelen (pp. 346-373). Amsterdam/Meppel: Boom,.

Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological bulletin, 116, 117–142.