Heterogeneous clinical spectrum of anti-SRP myositis and importance of the methods of detection of anti-SRP autoantibodies: a multicentric study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 64 - Trang 677-686 - 2016
Cécile Picard1, Thierry Vincent2,3, Jean-Christophe Lega4, Sophie Hue2,5, Françoise Fortenfant2,6, Daniela Lakomy2,7, René-Louis Humbel2,8, Joelle Goetz2,9, Nicolas Molinari10, Nathalie Bardin2,11, Daniel Bertin12, Catherine Johanet2,13, Pascale Chretien2,14, Sylvain Dubucquoi2,15, Nathalie Streichenberger16, Sophie Desplat-Jégo2,12, Xavier Bossuyt2,17,18, Jean Sibilia2,19, Isabelle Abreu2,20, Alain Chevailler2,21, Nicole Fabien1,2
1Department of Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Benite Cedex, France
2Groupe d’Etude de l’Auto-Immunité (GEAI), Angers, France
3Department of Immunology, St Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University, CHRU de Montpellier, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
4Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon-1, Pierre-Benite Cedex, France
5Department of Immunology, CHU Henri Mondor - Service d’Immunologie Biologique, Créteil, France
6Department of Immunology, Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France
7Department of Immunology, CHU Dijon, Dijon, Cedex, France
8Laboratoire Luxembourgeois d’Immuno-Pathologie, Esch-Suralzette, Luxembourg
9Department of Immunology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
10Department of Medical Information, CHU de Montpellier, UMR Mistea, Montpellier, France
11Department of Biological Immunology, UMR-S 1076, Faculté de Pharmacie, LBM AP-HM et Aix-Marseille-Université, Marseille, France
12Department of Biological Immunology, UMR CNRS/AMU 7259, LBM AP-HM et Aix-Marseille-Université, Marseille, France
13Department of Immunology, AP-HP hôpital Saint-Antoine, UFR 967, Faculté de medecine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris Cedex 12, France
14Department of Immunology, CHU Bicetre, Kremlin Bicêtre, France
15Department of Immunology, Univ Lille Nord de France, Lille, France
16Hôpital Cardiovasculaire et pneumologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
17Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Catholic University of Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
18Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
19Department of Rheumatology, Centre national de référence des maladies auto-immunes systémiques rares, CHU Hautepierre, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
20Departamento Universitário de Imunologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Lisbon, Portugal
21Department of Immunology and Allergology, CHU Hôpital Larrey, Institut de Biologie en Santé, Angers Cedex 9, France

Tóm tắt

Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies are important serological markers for the diagnosis and the prognosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), especially to distinguish immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). This study was set up to investigate the phenotype associated with anti-SRP antibodies and to evaluate the methods for detecting these antibodies. Clinical and biological data were retrospectively obtained from 60 adult patients with anti-SRP antibodies detected by a dot immunoassay from 12 centers. Thirty-six (60 %) out of these 60 patients suffered from an IIM, and among them, 21 patients were diagnosed as IMNM. Among patients with a definite IIM, proximal weakness and myalgia were prominent symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Only few patients displayed severe extra-muscular symptoms such as cardiac involvement or severe myositis. Mean creatine kinase levels were high for all patients except for two of them. When testing by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp2 cells, the fraction of patients displaying the typical anti-SRP fine speckled staining of the cytoplasm was higher in patients with IIM (30/36) (83 %) than in patients with non-IIM (3/24) (12.5 %) (p < 0.0001). Thirty (91 %) out of 33 patients with a positive immunodot and a characteristic IIF cytoplasmic staining suffered from a clinical definite myositis, whereas only 6 (22 %) out of 27 patients with a positive immunodot but a negative cytoplasmic pattern suffered from a myositis (p < 0.00001). This series highlights the strong heterogeneity of anti-SRP positivity that encompassed IMNM and non-IMNM and supports the necessity of considering both IIF and dot immunoassay to confirm the diagnosis of anti-SRP-associated myositis.

Tài liệu tham khảo