Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research

Agrawal, 2002, Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT, Management Science, 48, 44, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279 Azoulay, P., Ding, W., Stuart, T., 2006. The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research. NBER working paper 11917, Cambridge, MA. Balconi, 2004, Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data., Research Policy, XXXIII, 127, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2 Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., Montobbio, F., 2006. University patenting and scientific productivity. A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. CESPRI working paper no. 189, Milan. Breschi, 2007, The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 101, 10.1080/10438590600982830 Cassiman, 2008, In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 611, 10.1093/icc/dtn023 Czarnitzki, 2007, Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity, Research Evaluation, 16, 311, 10.3152/095820207X254439 Debackere, 2005, The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry–science links, Research Policy, 34, 321, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003 Diamond, 1986, The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists, Journal of Gerontology, 41, 520, 10.1093/geronj/41.4.520 Fabrizio, K.R., DiMinin, A., 2005. Commercializing the laboratory: faculty patenting and the open science environment. Working Paper, University of California. Geuna, 2006, University patenting and its effects on academic research: emerging European evidence, Research Policy, 35, 790, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005 Glänzel, 2003, Patents cited in the scientific literature: an exploratory study of ‘reverse’ citation relations in the triple helix, Scientometrics, 58, 415, 10.1023/A:1026248929668 Hall, 2001, Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 87, 10.1023/A:1007888312792 Hall, 2007, Identifying age, cohort and period effects in scientific research productivity: discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 159, 10.1080/10438590600983010 Harhoff, 1999, Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 511, 10.1162/003465399558265 Hausman, 1984, Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship, Econometrica, 52, 909, 10.2307/1911191 Henderson, 1998, Universities as a source of commercial technology, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119, 10.1162/003465398557221 Hicks, 2000, 360 degree linkage analysis, Research Evaluation, 9, 133, 10.3152/147154400781777313 Holmes, A., Oppenheim, C., 2001. Use of citation analysis to predict the outcome of the 2001 research assessment exercise for unit of assessment (UoA) 61: library and information management. Information Research 6 (2), available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/6-2/paper103.html. Kilger, 2002, New rules for German professors, Science, 298, 1173, 10.1126/science.1075269 Levin, 1991, Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists, American Economic Review, 81, 114 Lissoni, F., Sanditov, B., Tarasconi, G., 2006. The KEINS database on academic inventors: Methodology and contents. CESPRI working paper no. 181, Milan. Lowe, 2007, Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity, Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 173, 10.1007/s10961-006-9014-y Merton, 1968, The normative structure of science Meyer, 2006, Inventor–authors: knowledge integrators or weak links?, Scientometrics, 68, 545, 10.1007/s11192-006-0129-6 Meyer, 2006, Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor–authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology, Research Policy, 35, 1646, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.013 Meyer, 2003, Toward hybrid triple helix indicators: a study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors, Scientometrics, 58, 321, 10.1023/A:1026240727851 Michel, 2001, Patent citation analysis. A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports, Scientometrics, 15, 185, 10.1023/A:1010577030871 Mowery, 2002, Academic patenting quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States, Research Policy, 31, 399, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0 Mowery, 2002, Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning abd the characteristics of U.S. university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981–1992, Management Science, 48, 73, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.73.14278 Murray, 2002, Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering, Research Policy, 31, 1389, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7 Narin, 1985, Is technology becoming science?, Scientometrics, 7, 369, 10.1007/BF02017155 Noyons, 1994, Exploring the science and technology interface—inventor author relations in laser medicine research, Research Policy, 23, 443, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90007-8 Rosell, C., Agrawal, A., 2006. University Patenting: Estimating the diminishing Breadth of Knowledge Diffusion and Consumption. NBER Working Paper no. 12640. Rosenberg, 1998, Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology, 167 Sampat, 2003, Changes in university patent quality after the Bauh-Dole act: a re-examination, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1371, 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0 2000 Scotchmer, 2004 Siegel, 2003, Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an explorative study, Research Policy, 32, 27, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2 Stephan, 2007, Who's patenting in the university?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16, 71, 10.1080/10438590600982806 Thursby, 2002, Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48, 90, 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271 Thursby, M.C., Thursby, J.G., Mukherjee, S., 2005. Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. NBER Working Paper 11497, Cambridge, MA. Thursby, J.G., Fuller, A., Thursby, M.C., 2007. US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. NBER Working Paper 13256, Cambridge, MA. Trajtenberg, 1997, University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 5, 19, 10.1080/10438599700000006 Turner, L., Mairesse, J., forthcoming. Productivity differences across individuals in public research: an econometric study of French physicists’ publications and citations (1980–1997). Annales d’Économie et de Statistique. Van Looy, 2006, Publication and patent behaviour of academic researchers: conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?, Research Policy, 35, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.003 Verspagen, 2006, University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 607, 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x Wooldridge, 1999, Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, 90, 77, 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00033-5 Wooldridge, 2002 Zucker, 2000, Capturing technological opportunities via Japan's star scientists, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 37, 10.1023/A:1007832127813