Heterogeneity in adult anthropometry by socioeconomic factors: Indian National Family Health Survey 2006 and 2016

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition - Tập 74 Số 6 - Trang 953-960 - 2020
Rockli Kim1, Praveen Kumar Pathak2, Niharika Tripathi3, S. V. Subramanian4
1Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA
2Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
3National Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
4Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Perkins JM, Subramanian S, Davey Smith G, Özaltin E. Adult height, nutrition, and population health. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:149–165.

Popkin B, Slining M. New dynamics in global obesity facing low‐and middle‐income countries. Obes Rev. 2013;14:11–20.

Bozzoli C, Deaton A, Quintana-Domeque C. Adult height and childhood disease. Demography. 2009;46:647–69.

Deaton A. Height, health, and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:13232–7.

Subramanian S, Perkins JM, Özaltin E, Davey Smith G. Weight of nations: a socioeconomic analysis of women in low-to middle-income countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;93:413–21.

Subramanian S, Smith GD. Patterns, distribution, and determinants of under-and overnutrition: a population-based study of women in India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:633–40.

McLaren L, Gauvin L. Does the ‘average size’of women in the neighbourhood influence a woman’s likelihood of body dissatisfaction? Health Place. 2003;9:327–35.

Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological Bull. 1989;105:260.

Griffiths P, Bentley M. Women of higher socio-economic status are more likely to be overweight in Karnataka, India. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:1217.

Drewnowski A, Popkin BM. The nutrition transition: new trends in the global diet. Nutr Rev. 1997;55:31–43.

Steckel RH. Height and per capita income. Hist Methods. 1983;16:1–7.

Subramanian S, Özaltin E, Finlay JE. Height of nations: a socioeconomic analysis of cohort differences and patterns among women in 54 low-to middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18962.

Perkins JM, Khan KT, Smith GD, Subramanian S. Patterns and trends of adult height in India in 2005–2006. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9:184–93.

Hübler O. The nonlinear link between height and wages in Germany, 1985–2004. Econ Hum Biol. 2009;7:191–9.

Kim R, Kawachi I, Coull BA, Subramanian SV. Patterning of individual heterogeneity in body mass index: evidence from 57 low-and middle-income countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33:741–50.

Razak F, Corsi DJ, Subramanian S. Change in the body mass index distribution for women: analysis of surveys from 37 low-and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001367.

Krishna A, Razak F, Lebel A, Davey Smith G, Subramanian S. Trends in group inequalities and interindividual inequalities in BMI in the United States, 1993–2012–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101:598–605.

Gausman J, Guevara IM, Subramanian S, Razak F. Distributional change of women’s adult height in low-and middle-income countries over the past half century: an observational study using cross-sectional survey data. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002568.

Razak F, Davey Smith G, Subramanian S. The idea of uniform change: is it time to revisit a central tenet of Rose’s “Strategy of Preventive Medicine”. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104:1497–507.

Subramanian S, Kim R, Christakis NA. The “average” treatment effect: a construct ripe for retirement. a commentary on Deaton and Cartwright. Soc Sci Med. 2018;210:77–82.

Vaezghasemi M, Razak F, Ng N, Subramanian S. Inter-individual inequality in BMI: an analysis of Indonesian Family Life Surveys (1993–2007). SSM-Popul Health. 2016;2:876–88.

IIPS. NFHS-4 (National Family Health Survey-4). India: International Institute for Population Studies; 2017.

IIPS. India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06. India: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007.

Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115–32.

Goldstein H. Heteroscedasticity and complex variation. In: Everrit B, Howell D, editors. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005:223–32.

Arcaya MC, Tucker-Seeley RD, Kim R, Schnake-Mahl A, So M, Subramanian S. Research on neighborhood effects on health in the United States: a systematic review of study characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 2016;168:16–29.

Goldstein H, Healy MJ, Rasbash J. Multilevel time series models with applications to repeated measures data. Stat Med. 1994;13:1643–55.

Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods. 2012;17:228.

Lewontin R, Levins R. Schmalhausen’s law. Capital Nat Soc. 2000;11:103–8.

Galea S, Ahern J, Karpati A. A model of underlying socioeconomic vulnerability in human populations: evidence from variability in population health and implications for public health. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2417–30.

Corsi DJ, Kyu HH, Subramanian S. socioeconomic and Geographic Patterning of Under-and Overnutrition among Women in Bangladesh1, 2. J Nutr. 2011;141:631–8.

Griffiths PL, Bentley ME. The nutrition transition is underway in India. J Nutr. 2001;131:2692–700.

Balarajan Y, Villamor E. Nationally representative surveys show recent increases in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age in Bangladesh, Nepal, and India. J Nutr. 2009;139:2139–44.

Himmelstein DU, Levins R, Woolhandler S. Beyond our means: patterns of variability of physiological traits. Int J Health Serv. 1990;20:115–24.

Murray CJ, Gakidou EE, Frenk J. Health inequalities and social group differences: what should we measure? Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77:537.