Help on the road: Effects of vehicle manual consultation in driving performance across modalities

Alvarez, I., et al., 2010. Voice interfaced user help. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Pittsburgh, PA, USA. BMW, 2011 Available from: 〈http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Content/Owner/BMWAssist/Default.aspx〉 (15/09/2011). Brumby, D.P., et al., 2011. Fast or safe?: how performance objectives determine modality output choices while interacting on the move. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 473–482. Bruyas, 2008 Cao, Y., et al., 2010. Local danger warnings for drivers: the effect of modality and level of assistance on driver reaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM. Hong Kong, China, pp. 239–248. Gordon, 2009, Crash studies of driver distraction, 281 Goselin, 2010, Use of a dual-task paradigm for measure listening effort, Can. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. Audiol., 3, 159 Gugerty, 2004, Effects of remote and in-person verbal interactions on verbalization rates and attention to dynamic spatial scenes, Accid. Anal. Prev., 36, 1029, 10.1016/j.aap.2003.12.002 Hart, 1988, Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, 139 Horrey, 2006, Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques, Hum. Factors, 48, 196, 10.1518/001872006776412135 Instruments, N., 2011. DIAdem. Iqbal, 2011, Hang on a Sc! effects of proactive mediation of phone conversations while driving, Work, 463 Jeon, M., et al., 2009. Enhanced auditory menu cues improve dual task performance and are preferred with in-vehicle technologies, In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, Editor, Essen, Germany, pp. 91–98. Just, 2008, A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak, Brain Res., 1205, 70, 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.075 Kern, Dagmar, Schmidt,Albrecht, 2009. Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM. Klauer, S.G., et al., 2006. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. N.H.T.S. Administration, Editor, DOT HS 810 594, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. Lee, 2008 Maciej, 2009, Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems, Accid. Analy. Prev., 41, 924, 10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.007 Mattes, 2003, The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation, 57 NHTSA, 2006a. Driver Workload Metrics Project Task2 Final Report, NHTSA, Editor. US Department of Transportation: Springfield, VA, pp. 58. NHTSA, 2006b. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: A Descriptive Analysis of Light Vehicle-Heavy Vehicle Interactions from the Light Vehicle Driver׳s Perspective, US Department of Transportation. NHTSA, 2012. Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices, D.o.T. (DOT), Editor. Fedeal Register, Washington DC, pp. 11200–11250. Olsson, S., Burns, P.C., 2000. Measuring Driver Visual Distraction With a Peripheral Detection Task (Master thesis). ISRN LIU-KOGVET-D-0031-SE. OnStar, 2011 Available from: 〈http://www.onstar.com/web/portal/trademark〉 (15/09/2011). Öz, 2010, Professional and non professional driver׳s stress reaction and risky driving, Transp. Res., 13, 32 Roberts, 2012, Warn me now or inform me later: drivers׳acceptance of real-time and post-drive ditraction mitigation systems, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 71, 967, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.08.002 Reed, N. and R. Robbins, The effect of text messaging on driver behavior. a simulator study. Transp. Res. Lab., 2008. Samuel, 2009, Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react, Accid. Anal. Prev., 41, 160, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.10.006 Schmidt, A., et al., 2010. Automotive User Interfaces: Human Computer Interaction in the Car. in CHI ’10. Vancouver, Canada. Simon, 2008, Die integrierte Betriebsanleitung. Die Zukunft der Bordliteratur, Elektron. Autom., 10 Sodnik, 2008, A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 66, 318, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.001 Strayer, 2001, Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone, Psychol. Sci., 12, 462, 10.1111/1467-9280.00386 Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view, MIS Q., 27, 425, 10.2307/30036540 Wickens, 2002, Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues, Ergon. Sci., 3, 159 Wolf, J.D., 1978. Crew workload assessment: development of a measure of operator workload. Yulan, 2007, Real-time detection of driver cognitive distraction using support vector machines, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 8, 340, 10.1109/TITS.2007.895298 Zachry, M., et al., 2001. The changing face of technical communication: new directions for the field in a new millennium. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, pp. 248–260. Ziefle, M., Pappachan, P., Jakobs, E.M., Wallentowitz, H., 2008. Future technology in the car. Visual and auditory interfaces of in-vehicle-technologies for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, vol. 5105, pp. 62-69, 2008