Hedging Price Risk Using Contracts for Difference with Volume Uncertainty
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology - Trang 1-8 - 2024
Tóm tắt
Energy market instability due to global geopolitical tensions has led to increased volatility in the electricity spot market, increasing financial risk for market participants. As a result, it is now more crucial than ever to investigate into strategies to protect against price volatility in the market. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how Contract for Difference (CfD) impacts risk mitigation for both power generators and retailers participating in the spot market. In particular, two types of CfD are considered, each dependent on the hours they are applied. The simulation results prove the presence of multiple sets of contract prices and volumes advantageous to both parties involved in the contract, allowing them to hedge against market risks without decreasing their expected profits.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Prokhorov O, Dreisbach D (2022) The impact of renewables on the incidents of negative prices in the energy spot markets. Energy Policy 167:113073
Chen S, Bouteska A, Sharif T, Abedin MZ (2023) The Russia-Ukraine war and energy market volatility: a novel application of the volatility ratio in the context of natural gas. Resour Policy 1(85):103792
Deng SJ, Oren SS (2006) Electricity derivatives and risk management. Energy 31(6–7):940–953
Selvi SC, Devi RP, Rajan C (2009) Multi-area unit commitment with bilateral contract approach in deregulated electricity market. J Electr Eng Technol 4(3):346–352
Yu N et al (2012) Financial bilateral contract negotiation in wholesale electricity markets using nash bargaining theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(1):251–267
El Khatib S, Galiana FD (2007) Negotiating Bilateral contracts in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(2):553–562
Boroumand RH et al (2015) Hedging strategies in energy markets: the case of electricity retailers. Energy Economics 51:503–509
Shin H, Baldick R (2018) Mitigating market risk for wind power providers via financial risk exchange. Energy Economics 71:344–358
Son S, Han S, Roh JH, Lee D (2018) Optimal offer strategies for energy storage system integrated wind power producers in the day-ahead energy and regulation markets. J Electr Eng Technol 13(6):2236–2244
Ausubel LM, Cramton P (2010) Using forward markets to improve electricity market design. Utilities Policy 18(4):195–200
Korea Investors Service, (2023) “Korea Credit Rating's Opinion on KEPCO's 2022 Preliminary Results”. 02
Schlecht, Ingmar, Christoph Maurer, and Lion Hirth. (2023) "Financial Contracts for Differences."
Shreve, Steven E. (2004) “Stochastic calculus for finance II: Continuous-time models”. Vol. 11. New York: springer.
Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J Deriv 4(3):7–49
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7):1443–1471
Sergey Sarykalin et al., (2014) “Value-at-Risk vs. Conditional Value-at-Risk in Risk Management and Optimization”, In INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research, Published online, Pages 270–294