Heat transfer in material having random thermal conductivity using Monte Carlo simulation and deep neural network

Rakesh Kumar1
1IIT Jodhpur, Jodhpur, India

Tóm tắt

Stochastic heat transfer simulations play a pivotal role in capturing real-world uncertainties, where randomness in material properties and boundary conditions is present. Traditional methods, such as Monte Carlo simulation, perturbation methods, and polynomial chaos expansion, have provided valuable insights but face challenges in efficiency and accuracy, particularly in high-dimensional systems. This paper introduces a methodology for one-dimensional heat transfer modeling that incorporates random boundary conditions and treats thermal conductivity as a random process The proposed approach integrates Monte Carlo simulation with Cholesky decomposition to generate a vector of thermal conductivity realizations, capturing the inherent randomness in material properties. Finite element method (FEM) simulations based on these realizations yield rich datasets of temperatures at various locations. A deep neural network (DNN) is then trained on this FEM data, enabling not only rapid and accurate temperature predictions but also bidirectional computations—predicting temperatures based on thermal conductivity and inversely estimating thermal conductivity from observed temperatures.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Billah MM, Khan AI, Liu J, Dutta P (2023) Physics-informed deep neural network for inverse heat transfer problems in materials. Mater Today Commun 106336 Branicki M, Majda AJ (2013) Fundamental limitations of polynomial chaos for uncertainty quantification in systems with intermittent instabilities. Commun Math Sci 11(1):55–103 Chakraborty S, Dey S (1995) Stochastic finite element method for spatial distribution of material properties and external loading. Comput Struct 55(1):41–45 Chen C, Pan Z (2023) A neural network-based method for real-time inversion of nonlinear heat transfer problems. Energies 16(23):7819 Cheong HT, Sivasankaran S, Bhuvaneswari M (2017) Natural convection in a wavy porous cavity with sinusoidal heating and internal heat generation. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow 27(2):287–309 Das SK, Kumar A, Das B, Burnwal A et al (2013) On soft computing techniques in various areas. Comput Sci Inf Technol 3(59):166 de Lima BS, Ebecken NF (2000) A comparison of models for uncertainty analysis by the finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 34(2):211–232 Edalatifar M, Tavakoli MB, Ghalambaz M, Setoudeh F (2021) Using deep learning to learn physics of conduction heat transfer. J Therm Anal Calorim 146:1435–1452 Fudym O, Orlande HRB, Bamford M, Batsale JC (2008) Bayesian approach for thermal diffusivity mapping from infrared images with spatially random heat pulse heating. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 135, IOP Publishing, pp 012042 Gates R, Choi M, Biswas SK, Helferty JJ (1993) Stabilization of flexible structures using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of 1993 International Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-93-Nagoya, Japan), Vol. 2, IEEE, pp 1817–1820 Ghanem R (1999) The nonlinear gaussian spectrum of log-normal stochastic processes and variables Ghanem RG, Spanos PD (2003) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach, Courier Corporation Guo Y, Li G, Mabuchi T, Surblys D, Ohara T, Tokumasu T (2022) Prediction of nanoscale thermal transport and adsorption of liquid containing surfactant at solid-liquid interface via deep learning. J Colloid Interface Sci 613:587–596 Hien T, Kleiber M (1990) Finite element analysis based on stochastic hamilton variational principle. Comput Struct 37(6):893–902 Jiang T, Guo L, Sun G, Chang W, Yang Z, Wang Y (2024) Pdi-hfp: An intelligent method for heat flux prediction on hypersonic aircraft based on projection depth images. Eng Appl Artif Intell 127:107366 Kamiński M (2010) Generalized stochastic perturbation technique in engineering computations. Math Comput Model 51(3–4):272–285 Liu WK, Belytschko T, Mani A (1986) Probabilistic finite elements for nonlinear structural dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 56(1):61–81 Liu WK, Belytschko T, Mani A (1986) Random field finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 23(10):1831–1845 Lucor D, Karniadakis GE (2004) Adaptive generalized polynomial chaos for nonlinear random oscillators. SIAM J Sci Comput 26(2):720–735 Marcel C, Clausse A, Frankiewicz C, Betz A, Attinger D (2017) Numerical investigation into the effect of surface wettability in pool boiling heat transfer with a stochastic-automata model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 111:657–665 Papadrakakis M, Papadopoulos V (1996) Robust and efficient methods for stochastic finite element analysis using monte carlo simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134(3–4):325–340 Pluch P (2007) Some theory for the analysis of random fields-with applications to geostatistics. arXiv:math/0701323 Sun B, Tenneti S, Subramaniam S, Koch DL (2016) Pseudo-turbulent heat flux and average gas-phase conduction during gas-solid heat transfer: flow past random fixed particle assemblies. J Fluid Mech 798:299–349 Vadyala SR, Betgeri SN, Matthews JC, Matthews E (2022) A review of physics-based machine learning in civil engineering. Results Eng 13:100316 Wang F, Li X (2017) The stagnant thermal conductivity of porous media predicted by the random walk theory. Int J Heat Mass Transf 107:520–533 Wang Y, Ren Q (2022) A versatile inversion approach for space/temperature/time-related thermal conductivity via deep learning. Int J Heat Mass Transf 186:122444 Wang T, Zhou G, Wang J, Zhou L (2018) Stochastic analysis of uncertain thermal parameters for random thermal regime of frozen soil around a single freezing pipe. Heat Mass Transf 54:2845–2852 Wang Y, Wang N, Ren Q (2022) Predicting surface heat flux on complex systems via conv-lstm. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 33:101927 Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The wiener-askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(2):619–644 Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2003) A new stochastic approach to transient heat conduction modeling with uncertainty. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(24):4681–4693