Health related quality of life in ureteral stone patients: post-ureterolithiasis

Urological Research - Tập 39 - Trang 385-388 - 2011
Danny M. Rabah1, Mohamed AlOmar2, Saleh Binsaleh2, Mostafa A. Arafa3
1Urology Department, King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Princess Al Johara Al Ibrahim for Cancer Research, Prostate Cancer Research Unity, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3King Saud University, King Khalid University Hospital, Princess Al Johara Al Ibrahim for Cancer Research, Prostate Cancer Research Unity, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Tóm tắt

Ureteral stones disease is among the most painful and prevalent among urologic disorders that can substantially impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly in patients with a history of recurrent stones. The aim of the study is to assess the QoL in patients with ureteral calculi after surgical intervention and identifying the most significant factors that could impact their QoL. The target population included two groups: post-lithotripsy patients and comparator group comprising healthy individuals selected from the general population. Both groups were matched for age and gender. The study continued through a period of 9 months. An observation period of 4–10 months following the last surgical intervention was applied before interviewing patients. Information regarding socio-demographics, medical data and presence of co-morbidities were recorded. The Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36-item survey (SF-36) was used to assess HRQoL for both groups. Based on the SF-36 questionnaire, there were no significant differences between patients and healthy volunteers in the mean scores for eight of the HRQoL domains, except for pain and social functioning subscales. Patient’s age, distal ureteral stones and ureteral stent, in addition to DM and low back pain appeared to significantly affect the HRQoL of patients. In conclusion, the promising end point in the management of urolithiasis is improvement of HRQoL. The results of the current study support the notion that urinary stone disease is not a life threatening disease and patients can return to normal life after surgical intervention. Prospective studies are warranted for elucidating the factors influencing HRQoL in ureteral stone patients to optimize patient care.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M (2000) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol 13:45–50 Lee YH, Huang, Tsai JY (2002) Epidemiologic studies on the prevalence of upper urinary tract calculi in Taiwan. Urol Int 68:172–177 Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini R, Melone F, Travaglini F, Carini M et al (2007) Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis. Urol Int 79(Supp 1):3–7 Ketabchi AA, Aziziolahi GA (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic urinary calculi in Kerman, Iran. Urol J 5:156–160 Tiselius HG (2003) Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease. BJU Int 91:758–767 Gambaro G, Reis-Santos JM, Rao N (2004) Nephrolithiasis: why doesn’t our "learning" progress? Eur Urol 45:547–556 Management of ureteral stones. American urological Association Foundation. http://www.urologyhealth.org/adult/index.cfm?cat=12&topic=105. Accessed 10/12/2010 Last JM, Spasoff RA, Harris SS, Thuriaux MC, Anderson JB (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, p 148 Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res 13:283–298 Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston Kurahashi T, Miyake H, Shinozaki M, Oka N, Takenaka A, Isao H et al (2008) Health related quality of life in patients undergoing lithotripsy for urinary stones. Int Urol Nephrol 40(1):39–43 Arafa MA, Rabah DM (2010) Study of quality of life and its determinants in patients after urinary stone fragmentation. Health and quality of life outcomes. 8:119 Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE (1999) Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48:1507–1515 Davidson PJ, Sheerin IG, Frampton C (2009) Renal stone diseases in Christchurch New Zealand. Part 1: Presentation and epidemiology. N Z Med J 122(1297):49–56 Bensalah K, Tuncel A, Gupta A, Raman JD, Pearls MS, Litan Y (2008) Determinants of quality of life for patients with kidney stones. J Urol 179(6):2238–2243 Damiano R, Autorino R, De Sio M, cantiello F, Quarto G, Perdona S Sacco R, D’Aremiento M (2005) Does the size of ureteral stent impact urinary symptoms and quality of life? A prospective randomized study Eur Urol 48:673–678 Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keely FX Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ (2003) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 169(3):1065–1069 Leibovici D, Cooper A, Lindet A, Ostrowsky R, Kleinmann J, Velikanov S, Cipele H, Goren E (2005) Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life. Isr Med Assoc J 7(8):491–494 Kristina lP, Stephen YK (2007) Health related quality of life differs between male and female stone formers. J Urol 178:2435–2440 Diniz DH, Blay SL, Schor N (2007) Quality of life for patients with nephrolithiasis and recurrent painful renal colic. Nephron Clin Pract 106(3):c91–c97