Health and fairness with other-regarding preferences
Tóm tắt
This paper explores how to rank social allocations when individuals have other-regarding preferences (ORPs). Unlike the few existing studies on this issue, we focus on two different private goods, only one of which generates ORPs concerns. Specifically, individuals exhibit other-regarding views about the social health state but have standard self-centered preferences over other goods, namely consumption. Our social evaluation also incorporates a fairness view that aims to reduce inequalities that originate from factors for which individuals should not be deemed responsible. By resorting to a non-resourcist approach, we derive social preferences that seek to reduce individual well-being inequalities. Such differences are assessed by means of an interpersonal comparable measure that is related to an ideal situation which involves neither externalities nor unfair inequalities. We obtain that the use of the state of perfect health as the reference value leads society to give a higher priority to those who exhibit more altruistic preferences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bauer M, Chytilová J, Pertold-Gebicka B (2014) Parental background and other-regarding preferences in children. Exp Econ 17(1):24–46
Bossert W, Fleurbaey M, Van de Gaer D (1999) Responsibility, talent, and compensation: a second-best analysis. Rev Econ Des 4(1):35–55
Braakmann N (2014) The consequences of own and spousal disability on labor market outcomes and subjective well-being: evidence from germany. Rev Econ Househ 12(4):717–736
Bruhin A, Winkelmann R (2009) Happiness functions with preference interdependence and heterogeneity: the case of altruism within the family. J Popul Econ 22(4):1063–1080
Calo-Blanco A (2016) Fair compensation with different social concerns for forgiveness. Rev Econ Des 20(1):39–56
Carrieri V (2012) Social comparison and subjective well-being: Does the health of others matter? Bull Econ Res 64(1):31–55
Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J Econ Liter 46(1):95–144
D’Aspremont C, Gevers L (1977) Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Rev Econ Stud 44(2):199–209
De Mello L, Tiongson ER (2009) What is the value of (my and my family’s) good health? Kyklos 62(4):594–610
Decerf B, Van der Linden M (2016) Fair social orderings with other-regarding preferences. Social Choice Welfare 46(3):655–694
Dickie M, Messman VL (2004) Parental altruism and the value of avoiding acute illness: Are kids worth more than parents? J Environ Econ Manag 48(3):1146–1174
Dufwenberg M, Heidhues P, Kirchsteiger G, Riedel F, Sobel J (2011) Other-regarding preferences in general equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 78(2):613–639
Fehr E, Schmidt K M (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—experimental evidence and new theories. In: Kolm S-C, Ythier JM (Eds), Foundations, vol 1. Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, Chap. 8. Elsevier, pp 615–691
Fleurbaey M (2005a) Health, wealth, and fairness. J Public Econ Theory 7(2):253–284
Fleurbaey M (2005b) The Pazner-Schmeidler social ordering: a defense. Rev Econ Des 9(2):145–166
Fleurbaey M (2012) The importance of what people care about. Polit Philos Econ 11(4):415–447
Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2005) Fair social orderings when agents have unequal production skills. Social Choice Welfare 24(1):93–127
Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2011) A theory of fairness and social welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E (2011) Equity in health and health care. In: Pauly MV, Mcguire TG, Barros PP (eds) Handbook of Health Economics, Vol 2, Chap 16. Elsevier, pp 1003–1092
Forssén ASK, Carlstedt G, Mörtberg CM (2005) Compulsive sensitivity-a consequence of caring: a qualitative investigation into women carer’s difficulties in limiting their labours. Health Care Women Int 26(8):652–671
Frank RH (2005) Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. Am Econ Rev 95(2):137–141
Golics CJ, Basra MKA, Finlay AY, Salek S (2013) The impact of disease on family members: a critical aspect of medical care. J R Soc Med 106(10):399–407
Hammond PJ (1976) Equity, Arrow’s conditions, and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica 44(4):793–804
Harsanyi JC (1982) Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. In: Sen A, Williams B (eds) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 39–62
Hougaard JL, Moreno-Ternero JD, Østerdal LP (2013) A new axiomatic approach to the evaluation of population health. J Health Econ 32(3):515–523
Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120(3):963–1002
Maniquet F, Sprumont Y (2005) Welfare egalitarianism in non-rival environments. J Econ Theory 120(2):155–174
Mendolia S (2014) The impact of husband’s job loss on partners’ mental health. Rev Econ Househ 12(2):277–294
Østerdal LP (2005) Axioms for health care resource allocation. J Health Econ 24(4):679–702
Pazner EA, Schmeidler D (1978) Egalitarian equivalent allocations: A new concept of economic equity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 92(4):671–687
Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2006) Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: an updated meta-analysis. J Gerontol Ser B 61(1):33–45
Post SG (2007) Altruism and health: perspectives from empirical research. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rees J, O’Boyle C, MacDonagh R (2001) Quality of life: impact of chronic illness on the partner. J R Soc Med 94(11):563–566
Sobel J (2005) Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J Econ Liter 43(2):392–436
Treibich R (2019) Welfare egalitarianism with other-regarding preferences. Social Choice Welfare 52(1):1–28
Ussher JM, Sandoval M (2008) Gender differences in the construction and experience of cancer care: the consequences of the gendered positioning of carers. Psychol Health 23(8):945–963
Viscusi WK, Magat WA, Forrest A (1988) Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction. J Policy Anal Manag 7(2):227–245
Winkelmann L, Winkelmann R (1995) Happiness and unemployment: a panel data analysis for germany. Appl Econ Q 41(4):293–307
Yee JL, Schulz R (2000) Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity among family caregivers: a review and analysis. The Gerontologist 40(2):147–164