Harvesting to Extinction: Is It Socially Rational?

Journal of Bioeconomics - Tập 4 - Trang 135-162 - 2002
Shmuel Amir1,2
1Department of Geography, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
2Division of Applied Physics, Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Israel

Tóm tắt

This paper presents a critique of the neoclassical view of the optimal use of renewable resources and offers an alternative view based on the method of classical thermodynamics. The presentation is forwarded via the issue of harvesting to extinction. Based on simple models, the traditional theory suggests that society would benefit from wiping out any renewable resource whose intrinsic growth rate, though positive, is smaller than the social rate of time preference. The latter is the rate society is using to discount its future benefits and costs. To bypass this ecologically implausible outcome, the simplistic assumptions have been modified in various ways. For example, either the costs or the benefits of harvesting have been made to depend on the stock of the resource as well as on the yield. The modifications offered make society less prone to wipe out resources intentionally, but they still disregard a more fundamental difficulty: The traditional theory is not consistent with the second law of thermodynamics; it describes a process that defies the second law, which no known system is able to be undergoing. No doubt, the theory should be challenged first and foremost on this ground, but none of the offered modifications is capable of annulling this inconsistency. A deeper change is needed because the social values of the resource as perceived by a society that behaves in manners consistent with the second law and as defined by the traditional theory necessarily differ. The paper identifies the socially consistent value and shows that harvesting to extinction is never optimal socially. Were society to follow the socially inconsistent value, it would always underestimate the importance of self-sustained resources. However, the unlikely refutability of the second law turns this possibility and the socially favored extinctions into arguable outcomes of an untenable theory rather than undesirable outcomes of a sound theory. Potentially growing renewable resources are wiped out in real life for various reasons, but when they are preyed to extinction, their unfortunate fate is an outcome of the dynamics of a socially unregulated system rather than a social objective coming to fruition.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amir, Shmuel. 1994. The role of thermodynamics in the analysis of economic and ecological systems. Ecological Economics 10:125–142.

Amir, Shmuel. 1995. Welfare maximization in economic theory: Another viewpoint. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 6:359–376.

Amir, Shmuel. 1998. The role of thermodynamics for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 27:213–214.

Arrow, Kenneth J. & Mordecai Kurz. 1970. Public investment, the rate of return, and optimal fiscal policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen V. 1891. The positive theory of capital. G.E. Stechert, New-York, NY.

Brown, Gardner Jr. 1974. An optimal program for managing common property resources with congestion externalities. Journal of Political Economy 82:163–173.

Clark, Colin W. 1971. Economically optimal policies for the utilization of biologically renewable resources. Mathematical. BioScience 12:245–260.

Clark, Colin W. 1973. Profit maximization and the extinction of animal species. Journal of Political Economy 81:950–961.

Clark, Colin W. 1976. Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Conard, Jon M. 1989. Bioeconomics and the Bowhead Whale. Journal of Political Economy 97:974–987.

Cropper, Maureen L. 1988. A note on the extinction of renewable resources. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15:64–70.

Daly, Herman E. 1985. The circular flow of exchange value and the linear throughput of matter-energy: A case of misplaced concreteness. Review of Social Economics 43:279–297.

Daly, Herman E. 1987. The economic growth debate: What some economists have learned and many have not. Journal of Environmetal Economics and Management 14:323–336.

Daly, Herman E. 1997. Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics 22:261–266.

Fisher, Anthony C. 1988. Key aspects of species extinction: Habitat loss and overexploitation. Pp. 59–69 in V. Kerry Smith (ed.) Environmental Resources and Applied Welfare Economics. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Fisher, Anthony C. & John V. Krutilla. 1974. Valuing long run ecological consequences and irreversibilities. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 1:96–108.

Freeman, A. Myrick III. 1993. Nonuse values in natural damage assessment. Pp. 264–303 R. in J. Kopp & V. Kerry Smith (ed.) Valuing Natural Assets: The Economics of Natural Resource Damage Assessment Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1976. Energy and economic myths. Pp. 3–36 in N. Georgescu-Roegen, Energy and Economic Myths. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.

Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1979. Energy analysis and economic valuation. Southern Economic Journal 45:1023–1058.

Hartman, Richard. 1976. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economic Inquiry 14:52–58.

Hatsopoulos, George N. & Joseph H. Keenan. 1965. Principles of general thermodynamics. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Kamien, Morton I. & Nancy L. Schwartz. 1991. Dynamic optimization: The calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. 2nd ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Kopp, Raymond J. 1991. The proper role of existence value in public decision making. Dp QE91–17. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Kopp, Raymond J. & V. Kerry Smith. 1982. The perceived role of materials in neoclassical models of production technology. Pp. 201–244 in V.K. Smith & J.V. Krutila (eds.) Explorations in Natural Resource Economics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Lande, Russell, Steinar Engen & Bernt-Erik Seather. 1994. Optimal harvesting, economic discounting and extinction risk in fluctuating populations. Nature 372:88–90.

Ludwig, Donald, Ray Hilborn & Carl Walters. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from history. Science 260:17 & 36.

May, Robert M. 1994. The economics of extinction. Nature 372:42–43.

Michel, Philippe. 1982. On the transversality condition in infinite horizon optimal problems. Econometrica 50:975–985.

Neher, Philip A. 1974. Notes on the Volterra-quadratic fishery. Journal of Economic Theory 8:39–49.

Page, Talbot. 1988. Intergenerational equity and the social rate of discount. Pp. 71–89 in V. Kerry Smith (ed.). Environmental Resources and Applied Welfare Economics Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Plourde, Charles G. 1970. A simple model of replenishable natural resource exploitation. American Economic Review 60:518–522.

Plourde, Charles. 1979. Diagrammatic representations of the exploitation of replenishable natural resources: Dynamic iterations. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 6:119–126.

Pontryagin, L.S., V.G. Boltyanskii, R.V. Gamkrelidge & E.F. Mishchenko. 1962. The mathematical theory of optimal processes. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Prigogine, Ilya. 1961. Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes. 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Rosenberg, A.A., M.J. Fogarty, M.P. Sissenwine, J.R. Beddington & J.G. Shepherd. 1993. Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources. Science 262:828–829.

Skousen, Mark. 1990. The structure of production. New York University Press, New York, NY.

Solow, Robert M. 1986. On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88:141–149.

Solow, Robert M. 1997. Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz: Reply. Ecological Economics 22:269–270.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1979. A neoclassical analysis of the economics of natural resources. Pp. 36–66 in V.K. Smith (ed.). Scarcity and Growth Reconsidered. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Bioeconomics

Tập 4

135-162

Thông tin tác giả