Hard- and soft-line responses to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument

Acta Analytica - Tập 21 Số 4 - Trang 19-35 - 2006
Ishtiyaque Haji1, Stefaan E. Cuypers2
1Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
2Institute of Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Clarke, R. 1996: ‘Agent Causation and Event Causation in the Production of Free Action’, Philosophical Topics 24, 19–48.

Clarke, R. 2003: Libertarian Accounts of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.

Cuypers, S. E. 2004: ‘The Trouble With Harry. Compatibilist Free Will Internalism and Manipulation’, Journal of Philosophical Research 29, 235–54.

Cuypers, S. E. 2006: ‘The Trouble with Externalist Compatibilist Autonomy’, Philosophical Studies 129, 171–196.

Cuypers, S. E. and Haji, I. 2006: ‘Education for Critical Thinking: Can It Be Non-Indoctrinative?’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 38, 723–43.

Fischer, J. M. 2004: ‘Responsibility and Manipulation’, The Journal of Ethics 8, 145–77.

Fischer, J. M. 2006: ‘The Cards that are Dealt You’, The Journal of Ethics 10, 107–29.

Frankfurt, H. G. 1975: ‘Three Concepts of Free Action’, in H. G. Frankfurt 1988: The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–57.

Frankfurt, H. G. 2002: ‘Reply to John Martin Fischer’, in S. Buss and L. Overton, eds.: Contours of Agency. Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 27–31.

Glannon, W. 1998: ‘Moral Responsibility and Personal Identity’, American Philosophical Quarterly 35, 231–49.

Haji, I. 2000: ‘Death and Asymmetries in Moral Appraisals’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 24, 135–50.

Haji, I. and Cuypers, S. E. 2001: ‘Libertarian Free Will and CNC Manipulation’, Dialectica 55, 221–38.

Haji, I. and Cuypers, S. E. 2007 (forthcoming): Magical Agents, Global Induction, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85.

McKenna, M. 2005a: ‘The Relationship between Autonomous and Morally Responsible Agency’, in J. S. Taylor, ed.: Personal Autonomy. New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–34.

McKenna, M. 2005b (forthcoming): ‘Responsibility and Globally Manipulated Agents: Why Mele’s Beth Might be Blameworthy’, Philosophical Topics 33.

McKenna, M. forthcoming: ‘A Hard-line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Mele, A. R. 1995: Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy, New York: Oxford University Press.

Mele, A. R. 2005: ‘A critique of Pereboom’s “Four-Case Argument” for Incompatibilism’, Analysis 65: 75–80.

Mele, A. R. 2006: Free Will and Luck, New York: Oxford University Press.

O’Connor, T. 2000: Persons and Causes, New York: Oxford University Press.

Parfit, D. 1984: Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pereboom, D. 1995: ‘Determinism Al Dente’, Nous 29, 21–45.

Pereboom, D. 2001: Living Without Free Will, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pereboom, D. 2002: ‘Living Without Free Will: The Case for Hard Incompatibilism’, in R. Kane, ed.: The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press, 477–88.

Pereboom, D. 2005: ‘Defending Hard Incompatibilism’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29, 228–47.

Zimmerman, D. 1999: ‘Born Yesterday: Personal Autonomy for Agents Without a Past’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23, 236–66.

Zimmerman, M. J. forthcoming: ‘Moral Luck: A Partial Map’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.