Hafting and Retooling: Effects on the Archaeological Record
Tóm tắt
Hafting has long been recognized by archaeologists as a process affecting stone tools. However, the effects of this process on the archaeological record have been virtually ignored. Hafting affects the final typological form of tools because hafted tools are usually more extensively and intensively worked than their unhafted counterparts. Ethnoarchaeological and some recent archaeological evidence indicates that functionally equivalent but typologically diverse hafted and unhafted tools may be in use at the same site. Because hafted tools are disposed of as a consequence of the “retooling” of hafts, the context of their disposal may not be equivalent to the context of their use. But, unhafted tools appear to be disposed of more often at or near the focus of use. Indifference to the hafted/unhafted distinction then may seriously distort inferences based upon intrasite spatial analysis. It is also argued that hafting is a strategy that will be differentially employed by any social group at different sites according to circumstances, thereby contributing to interassemblage variability. Finally, some methods of analysis are suggested that will allow the typological and distributional effects of hafting and retooling to be taken into account by lithic analysts.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Drucker, 1940, The Tolowa and their southwest Oregon kin, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 36, 221
Schiffer, 1976, Behavioral archaeology
Radcliffe-Brown, 1933, The Andaman Islanders
Wheat, 1967, Survival arts of the primitive Paiutes
Lee, 1979, The .'Kung San
Keeley, 1978, Preliminary microwear analysis of the Meer assemblage, Les Chasseurs de Meer, F. Van Noten, 73
Whallon, 1978, The spatial analysis of Mesolithic occupation floors: a reappraisal, The early post-glacial settlement of Northern Europe, 27
Robertson, 1980, Unpublished M.A. thesis
DuBois, 1940, Wintu ethnography, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 36, 1
Gould, 1980, Living archaeology
Van Noten, 1978, Les Chasseurs de Meer, Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses
Clark, 1974, Interpretations of prehistoric technology from ancient Egyptian and other sources: Part I, Paleorient, 2, 323, 10.3406/paleo.1974.1057
Collins, 1981, The use of petroleum by Late Archaic and Early Woodland peoples in Jefferson County, Kentucky, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8, 55
Nelson, 1899, 18th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology
Kniffen, 1940, Pomo geography, University of California PubJications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 36, 353
Yellen, 1977, Archaeological approaches to the present
Odell, 1980, Verifying the reliability of lithic use-wear assessments by blind tests: the low-power approach, Journal of Field Archaeology, 7, 87
Grinnell, 1923, The Cheyenne Indians
Binford, 1973, The explanation of culture change, 227