Habitat preference and mobility of Polia bombycina: are non-tailored agri-environment schemes any good for a rare and localised species?

Journal of Insect Conservation - Tập 14 - Trang 499-510 - 2010
Thomas Merckx1, Ruth E. Feber1, Mark S. Parsons2, Nigel A. D. Bourn2, Martin C. Townsend1, Philip Riordan1, David W. Macdonald1
1Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Abingdon, UK
2Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK

Tóm tắt

General agri-environment schemes (AES) have been shown to benefit widespread species, but there is little information on the extent to which rare, more localised, species may also benefit. We tested whether AES options aimed at increasing general biodiversity also benefit a highly endangered moth, Polia bombycina, without species-specific tailoring. We assessed effects on its abundance of two AES options, wide field margins and hedgerow trees, using light traps at the landscape-scale and for mark-release-recapture at the farm-scale. We hypothesized that abundance would be highest at wide field margins and at hedgerow trees, and that if hedgerow trees conferred a positive effect, individuals would be more likely to follow hedgerows than crossing exposed fields while on the move. The results showed that significantly more individuals were captured at sites with a hedgerow tree. Numbers were also higher at wide margins, but this was not statistically significant, and no individuals were caught at field centres. Our study suggests that general options within appropriately designed and implemented AES aimed at increasing overall biodiversity in intensive agricultural landscapes have the potential to not only benefit common, widespread habitat generalists, but some rare and more endangered species as well. P. bombycina serves as an example of how general AES options, existing and novel ones alike, might cater for the needs of rare and localised species. As the precise ecological requirements of most invertebrate species remain unknown, we urge scientists and governments to address the challenge to research and design truly general AES, which options should be able to deliver not only for widespread species but also for the less-widespread counterpart of farmland biodiversity.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Auto Contr 19:716–723 Asteraki EJ, Hart BJ, Ings TC, Manley WJ (2004) Factors influencing the plant and invertebrate diversity of arable field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102:219–231 Bayliss JL, Simonite V, Thompson S (2005) The use of probabilistic habitat suitability models for biodiversity action planning. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:228–250 BC/DEFRA (2005) Pale Shining Brown BAP species fact sheet. Butterfly Conservation—UK government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/pale_shining_brown.pdf Bergman KO, Askling J, Ekberg O, Ignell H, Wahlman H, Milberg P (2004) Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27:619–628 Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150 Biodiversity Group UK (1999) Tranche 2 action plans–Volume VI: Terrestrial and freshwater species and habitats. JNCC, Peterborough, UK Boyce MS, Rushton SP, Lynam T (2007) Does modelling have a role in conservation? In: Macdonald DW, Service K (eds) Key topics in conservation biology. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 134–144 Browne SJ, Aebischer NJ (2003) Arable Stewardship: Impact of the pilot scheme on the Brown hare and Grey partridge after five years. Report RMP1870vs3 to DEFRA. UK government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inferences. A practical Information-Theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference–Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc Meth Res 33:261–304 Butler SJ, Vickery JA, Norris K (2007) Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 315:381–384 Butterfly Conservation (2007) The UK Biodiversity Action Plan—moths http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/uploads/The%20UK%20Biodiversity%20Action%20Plan%20-%20BC%20website%20draft%2020071.pdf Carvell C, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Goulson D, Nowakowski M (2007) Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumblebee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. J Appl Ecol 44:29–40 Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192 Davis JD, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2007) Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Land Ecol 22:1341–1354 de Jonga FMW, de Snoo GR, van de Zandec JC (2008) Estimated nationwide effects of pesticide spray drift on terrestrial habitats in the Netherlands. J Environ Manag 86:721–730 De Vlinderstichting/Werkgroep Vlinderfaunistiek (2008) Vlindernet, version 2—http://www.vlindernet.nl/vlindersoort_verspreiding.php?vlinderid=583andvq= DEFRA (2010) Trends, long term survival and ecological values of hedgerow trees: development of populations models to inform strategy. Forest Research, Forestry Commission, report to the UK government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London DEFRA/NE (2008) Environmental Stewardship Review of Progress. UK government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs—Natural England. http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/schemes/es/es-report.pdf DEFRA/NE (2009) Entry Level Stewardship: Environmental Stewardship handbook, third edition—February 2010. UK government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs—Natural England. http://naturalengland.etraderstores.com/NaturalEnglandShop/NE226 Dennis RLH (2004) Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecol Entomol 29:744–752 Dennis RLH (2010) A resource-based habitat view for conservation: Butterflies in the British landscape. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426 Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: The need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiv Cons 15:1943–1966 Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Sheppard DA (2007) Species conservation and landscape management: a habitat perspective. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 92–126 Donald PF, Evans AD (2006) Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. J Appl Ecol 43:209–218 Dover JW (1990) Butterflies and wildlife corridors. The Game Conservancy review of 1989, 21. The Game Conservancy, Hants, UK, pp 62–64 Dover JW (1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J Appl Ecol 33:723–734 Dover JW, Sparks T (2000) A review of the ecology of butterflies in British hedgerows. J Environ Manag 60:51–63 Dufour A, Gadallah F, Wagner HH, Guisan A, Buttler A (2006) Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effects of variability and spatial configuration. Ecography 29:573–584 Dutton A, Edwards-Jones G, Strachan R, Macdonald DW (2008) Ecological and social challenges to biodiversity conservation on farmland: reconnecting habitats on a landscape scale. Mam Rev 38:205–219 Evans AD (1997) The importance of mixed farming for seed-eating birds in the UK. In: Pain DJ, Pienkowski MW (eds) Farming and birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its implications for bird conservation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 331–357 Evans AD, Green RE (2007) An example of a two-tiered agri-environment scheme designed to deliver effectively the ecological requirements of both localised and widespread bird species in England. J Ornithol 148:S279–S286 Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Cons 100:65–74 Feber RE, Smith HE, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205 Field RG, Gardiner T, Mason CF, Hill J (2005) Agri-environment schemes and butterflies: the utilisation of 6 m grass margins. Biodiv Cons 14:1969–1976 Fry GLA (1991) Conservation in agricultural ecosystems. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 415–443 Grashof-Bokdam CJ, van Langevelde F (2005) Green veining: landscape determinants of biodiversity in European agricultural landscapes. Land Ecol 20:417–439 Grice P, Evans A, Osmond J, Brand-Hardy R (2004) Science into policy: the role of research in the development of a recovery plan for farmland birds in England. Ibis 146(S2):239–249 Heard MS, Carvell C, Carreck NL, Rothery P, Osborne JL, Bourke AFG (2007) Landscape context not patch size determines bumblebee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. Biol Lett 3:638–641 Heath J (1965) A genuinely portable MV light trap. Entomol Rec J Var 77:236–238 Heath J, Emmet AM (1979) The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 9. Harley, Colchester, UK Hendrickx F, Maelfait J, Van Wingerden W, Schweiger O, Speelmans M, Aviron S et al (2007) How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:340–351 Herzog F (2005) Agri-environment schemes as landscape experiments–Preface. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:175–177 Holland J, Fahrig L (2000) Effect of woody borders on insect density and diversity in crop fields: a landscape-scale analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:115–122 Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2007) Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context. J Appl Ecol 44:41–49 Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2008) Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos 117:354–361 Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. TREE 19:101–108 Kivinen S, Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Saarinen K (2007) Effects of land cover and climate on species richness of butterflies in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:453–460 Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969 Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F et al (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–254 Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovác A (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:903–909 Kohler F, Verhulst J, van Klink R, Kleijn D (2008) At what spatial scale do high-quality habitats enhance the diversity of forbs and pollinators in intensively farmed landscapes? J Appl Ecol 45:753–762 Konvicka M, Benes J, Cizek O, Kopecek F, Konvicka O, Vitaz L (2008) How too much care kills species: grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J Insect Cons 12:519–525 Langvall O, Ottosson Löfvenius M (2002) Effect of shelterwood density on nocturnal near-ground temperature, frost injury risk and budburst date of Norway spruce. Forest Ecol Manag 168:149–161 Leather SR (2009) Institutional vertebratism threatens UK food security. TREE 24:413–414 Lewis T, Stephenson JW (1966) The permeability of artificial windbreaks and the distribution of flying insects in the leeward sheltered zone. Ann Appl Biol 58:355–363 Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC Longley M, Sotherton NW (1997) Factors determining the effects of pesticides upon butterflies inhabiting arable farmland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 61:1–12 Macdonald DW, Feber RE, Tattersall FH, Johnson PJ (2000) Ecological experiments in farmland conservation. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 357–378 Macdonald DW, Tattersall FH, Service KM, Firbank LG, Feber RE (2007) Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside - what are the putative benefits? Mam Rev 37:259–277 Marini L, Fontana P, Scotton M, Klimek S (2008) Vascular plant and Orthoptera diversity in relation to grassland management and landscape composition in the European Alps. J Appl Ecol 45:361–370 Mattison EHA, Norris K (2005) Bridging the gaps between agricultural policy, land-use and biodiversity. TREE 20:610–616 Maudsley MJ (2000) A review of the ecology and conservation of hedgerow invertebrates in Britain. J Environ Manag 60:65–76 Merckx T, Van Dongen S, Matthysen E, Van Dyck H (2008) Thermal flight budget of a woodland butterfly in woodland versus agricultural landscapes: an experimental assessment. Basic Appl Ecol 9:433–442 Merckx T, Feber RE, Riordan P, Townsend MC, Bourn NAD, Parsons MS, Macdonald DW (2009a) Optimizing the biodiversity gain from agri-environment schemes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 130:177–182 Merckx T, Feber RE, Dulieu RL, Townsend MC, Parsons MS, Bourn NAD, Riordan P, Macdonald DW (2009b) Effect of field margins on moths depends on species mobility: field-based evidence for landscape-scale conservation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:302–309 NE (2008) HLS Targeting: The new approach [and associated regional statements] www.naturalengland.org.uk. Source correct at 28th November 2008. Natural England Nieminen M (1996) Migration of moth species in a network of small islands. Oecol 108:643–651 Öckinger E, Smith HG (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecol 149:526–534 Parsons MS, Kirby P (1993) The sussex emerald moth (Thalera fimbrialis Scop.) Survey–1992. JNCC Report, Peterborough, UK Parsons MS, Hoare D, Davis T, Green D (2005) The distribution of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan priority moth species 1999 to 2004. Atropos 25:5–20 Peach WJ, Lovett LJ, Wotton SR, Jeffs C (2001) Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biol Cons 101:361–373 Peng RK, Sutton SL, Fletcher CR (1992) Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of flying Diptera. J Zool 228:329–340 Polasky S, Nelson E, Camm J, Csuti B, Fackler P, Lonsdorf E et al (2008) Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol Cons 141:1505–1524 Pywell RF, Warman EA, Sparks TH, Greatorex-Davies JN, Walker KJ, Meek WR et al (2004) Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol Cons 118:313–325 Reid N, McDonald RA, Montgomery WI (2007) Mammals and agri-environment schemes: hare haven or pest paradise? J Appl Ecol 44:1200–1208 Richards SA (2005) Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: examples and cautionary results. Ecol 86:2805–2814 Ronkay L, Hacker H, Hreblay M (2002) Noctuidae Europaeae Vol. IV Hadeninae I. Entomological Press, Sorø Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2006) The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context. J Appl Ecol 43:1121–1127 Rundlöf M, Bengtsson J, Smith HG (2008a) Local and landscape effects of organic farming on butterfly species richness and abundance. J Appl Ecol 45:813–820 Rundlöf M, Nilsson H, Smith HG (2008b) Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumblebees. Biol Cons 141:417–426 Schneider C (2003) The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecol Entomol 28:252–256 Skinner B (1998) Moths of the British Isles. Viking, Penguin Books Ltd, London Stokes J, Hand K (2002) The hedge tree handbook. The Tree Council, London Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: are we asking the right question? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134 Taylor LR, French RA (1974) Effects of light trap design and illumination on samples of moths in an English woodland. Bull Entomol Res 63:583–594 Thomas K, Davis T, Parsons M (2006) Update on UK Biodiversity Action Plan moths-a summary for the year 2005. In: Thomas K, Davis T, Parsons M (eds) Lepidoptera Conservation Bulletin Number 7. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK, pp 8–15 Townsend MC, Merckx T (2007) Pale Shining Brown Polia bombycina (Hufn.) (Lep.: Noctuidae) re-discovered in Oxfordshire in 2005 and 2006–a nationally significant population of a UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species. Entomol Rec J Var 119:72–74 Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874 Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Wade MR, Wratten SD, Bengtsson J, Kleijn D (2007) Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 383–404 Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Watt AD, Niemelä J (2005) Effect of land-use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale. Ecography 28:3–16 Verhulst J, Kleijn D, Berendse F (2007) Direct and indirect effects of the most widely implemented Dutch agri-environment schemes on breeding waders. J Appl Ecol 44:70–80 Vickery JA, Bradbury RB, Henderson IG, Eaton MA, Grice PV (2004) The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biol Cons 119:19–39 Waring P (2002) Records of the Pale Shining Brown Polia bombycina (Hufn.) (Lep.: Noctuidae) in Oxfordshire, Hampshire and Wiltshire in the 1970s and 1980s. Entomol Rec J Var 114:128–129 Waring P (2008) Moths–wildlife reports. Brit Wild 20:55–57 Waring P, Townsend MC (2009) Field guide to the moths of Great Britain and Ireland, 2nd ed. British Wildlife Publishing, UK Warren MS (1992) Butterfly populations. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 73–92 Wilson A, Vickery J, Pendlebury C (2007) Agri-environment schemes as a tool for reversing declining populations of grassland waders: mixed benefits from environmentally sensitive areas in England. Biol Cons 136:128–135 Woiwod IP, Stewart AJA (1990) Butterflies and moths–Migration in the agricultural environment. In: Bunce RGH, Howard DC (eds) Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven Press, London, UK, pp 189–202 The action for threatened moths project (undated) Butterfly Conservation http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/downloads/915/saving_britains_moths.html