Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research

Enhancing the QUAlity and transparency of health research. The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/ (accessed 17 May 2017).

Tsujimoto, 2017, Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study, J Clin Epidemiol, 84, 54, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008

10.1186/cc11919

10.3310/hta16150

Zhang Z . Meta-epidemiological study: a step by step approach by using R. J Evid Based Med 2016:91–7.doi:10.1111/jebm.12191

Zhang, 2010, I-01 META-EPIDEMIOLOGY: BUILDING THE BRIDGE FROM RESEARCH EVIDENCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE, Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 18, S1, 10.1016/S1063-4584(10)00293-1

10.1002/sim.1184

10.1136/bmj.315.7109.617

Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, PLoS Med, 6, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

10.1002/14651858.MR000012.pub3

10.1093/ije/dyu115

Murad, 2017, Randomized trials addressing a similar question are commonly published after a trial stopped early for benefit, J Clin Epidemiol, 82, 12, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.10.006

Wang, 2016, Early studies reported extreme findings with large variability: a meta-epidemiologic study in the field of endocrinology, J Clin Epidemiol, 72, 27, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.015

10.1136/bmj.c1344

10.1001/jama.2014.5559

10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668

10.1001/jama.299.21.2543

10.1186/1745-6215-13-77

Samaan, 2013, A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature, J Multidiscip Healthc, 6, 169

Panic, 2013, Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138