Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions

Allergo Journal International - Tập 24 - Trang 94-105 - 2015
Knut Brockow1, Bernhard Przybilla2, Werner Aberer3, Andreas J. Bircher4, Randolf Brehler5, Heinrich Dickel6, Thomas Fuchs7, Thilo Jakob8, Lars Lange9, Wolfgang Pfützner10, Maja Mockenhaupt11, Hagen Ott12, Oliver Pfaar13, Johannes Ring1, Bernhardt Sachs14, Helmut Sitter15, Axel Trautmann16, Regina Treudler17, Bettina Wedi18, Margitta Worm19, Gerda Wurpts20, Torsten Zuberbier19, Hans F. Merk20
1Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy Center, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
3Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
4Department of Allergology, University Hospital Basle, Basle, Switzerland
5Department of Dermatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
6Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
7Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Göttingen University Hospital, Göttingen, Germany
8Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
9Department of Pediatrics, Marien Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
10Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Gießen and Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
11German Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
12Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital „Auf der Bult,“, Hannover, Germany
13ENT at Mannheim University Hospital, Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
14Federal Institute for Drugs and Medicinal Products, Bonn, Germany
15Institute of Theoretical Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
16Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Mainfranken Allergy, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
17Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
18Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
19Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
20Department of Dermatology and Allergology, RTWH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Tóm tắt

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable adverse drug reactions. They manifest either within 1–6 h following drug intake (immediate reactions) with mild to life-threatening symptoms of anaphylaxis, or several hours to days later (delayed reactions), primarily as exanthematous eruptions. It is not always possible to detect involvement of the immune system (allergy). Waiving diagnostic tests can result in severe reactions on renewed exposure on the one hand, and to unjustified treatment restrictions on the other. With this guideline, experts from various specialist societies and institutions have formulated recommendations and an algorithm for the diagnosis of allergies. The key principles of diagnosing allergic/hypersensitivity drug reactions are presented. Where possible, the objective is to perform allergy diagnostics within 4 weeks–6 months following the reaction. A clinical classification of symptoms based on the morphology and time course of the reaction is required in order to plan a diagnostic work-up. In the case of typical symptoms of a drug hypersensitivity reaction and unequivocal findings from validated skin and/or laboratory tests, a reaction can be attributed to a trigger with sufficient confidence. However, skin and laboratory tests are often negative or insufficiently reliable. In such cases, controlled provocation testing is required to clarify drug reactions. This method is reliable and safe when attention is paid to indications and contraindications and performed under appropriate medical supervision. The results of the overall assessment are discussed with the patient and documented in an „allergy passport“ in order to ensure targeted avoidance in the future and allow the use of alternative drugs where possible.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K et al. International Consensus (ICON) on Drug Allergy. Allergy 2014;69:420–437 Przybilla B, Aberer W, Bircher AJ et al. Allergologische Diagnostik von Überempfindlichkeitsreaktionen auf Arzneimittel. Allergo J 2008;17:90–94 Bircher AJ, Scherer Hofmeier K. Drug hypersensitivity reactions: inconsistency in the use of the classification of immediate and nonimmediate reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;129:263–264; author reply 265-6 Gomes E, Pichler W, Demoly P et al. The drug ambassador project: the diversity of diagnostic procedures for drug allergy around Europe. J World Allergy Org 2004;17:1–10 Fernandez TD, Torres MJ, Blanca-Lopez N et al. Negativization rates of IgE radioimmunoassay and basophil activation test in immediate reactions to penicillins. Allergy 2009;64:242–248 Brockow K, Ring J. Anaphylaxis to radiographic contrast media. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;11:326–331 Kim SH, Jo EJ, Kim MY et al. Clinical value of radiocontrast media skin tests as a prescreening and diagnostic tool in hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013;110:258–262 Wedi B. Fragebogen Medikamentenüberempfindlichkeit. Allergo J 2005;14:611-7 Demoly P, Kropf R, Bircher A, Pichler WJ. Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 1999;54:999-1003 Rueff F, Bergmann KC, Brockow K et al. Hauttests zur Diagnostik von allergischen Soforttypreaktionen. Allergo J 2010;19:402–415 Brockow K, Romano A, Blanca M et al. General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2002;57:45–51 Mertes PM, Alla F, Trechot P et al. Anaphylaxis during anesthesia in France: an 8-year national survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:366–373 Brockow K. Dilemmas of allergy diagnosis in perioperative anaphylaxis. Allergy 2014;69:1265–1266 Brockow K, Garvey LH, Aberer W et al. Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs — an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper. Allergy 2013;68:702–712 Riezzo I, Bello S, Neri M et al. Ceftriaxone intradermal test-related fatal anaphylactic shock: a medico-legal nightmare. Allergy 2010;65:130–131 Ring J, Beyer K, Biedermann T et al. Akuttherapie und Management der Anaphylaxie. Allergo J Int 2014; 23:36–52 Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 2014;69:1026–1045 Renz H, Becker WM, Bufe A et al. In-vitro-Allergiediagnostik. Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie. Allergo J 2002;11:492–506 Brockow K. Arzneimittelreaktionen vom Soforttyp. Epidemiologie, Klinik, Auslöser und Management. Hautarzt 2014; 65:409–414 Ebo DG, Bridts CH, Mertens CH et al. Analyzing histamine release by flow cytometry (HistaFlow): a novel instrument to study the degranulation patterns of basophils. J Immunol Methods 2012;375:30–38 Porebski G, Gschwend-Zawodniak A, Pichler WJ. In vitro diagnosis of T cell-mediated drug allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2011;41:461–470 Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A et al. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy 2003;58:854–863 Kowalski ML, Asero R, Bavbek S et al. Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Allergy 2013;68:1219–1232 Defrance C, Bousquet PJ, Demoly P. Evaluating the negative predictive value of provocation tests with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Allergy 2011;66:1410–1414 Demoly P, Romano A, Botelho C et al. Determining the negative predictive value of provocation tests with beta-lactams. Allergy 2010;65:327–332 Coombs PR, Gell PG. Classification of allergic reactions responsible for clinical hypersensitivity and disease. In: Clinical Aspects of Immunology, ed. Gell RR. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968; 575–596