Các chỉ số chất lượng dựa trên hướng dẫn - so sánh hệ thống giữa các hướng dẫn thực hành lâm sàng của Đức và quốc tế

Implementation Science - Tập 14 - Trang 1-17 - 2019
Monika Becker1, Jessica Breuing1, Monika Nothacker2, Stefanie Deckert3, Marie Brombach3, Jochen Schmitt3, Edmund Neugebauer1,4, Dawid Pieper1
1Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Department Evidence-based health services research, Faculty of Health, Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
2AWMF-Institute for Medical Knowledge Management c/o Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
3Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
4Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Neuruppin, Germany

Tóm tắt

Các hướng dẫn thực hành lâm sàng dựa trên bằng chứng (CPGs) là nguồn thông tin quan trọng để phát triển các chỉ số chất lượng (QIs). Mục tiêu của nghiên cứu này là so sánh các QIs dựa trên hướng dẫn của các CPGs Đức và quốc tế cùng với các phương pháp phương pháp luận mà chúng dựa trên. Chúng tôi đã thực hiện các tìm kiếm hệ thống trong các cơ sở dữ liệu hướng dẫn của G-I-N (Mạng lưới Hướng dẫn Quốc tế) và NGC (Trung tâm Hướng dẫn Quốc gia) trong khoảng thời gian từ tháng Hai đến tháng Sáu năm 2017 để xác định các CPGs quốc tế phù hợp với các chủ đề của các CPGs Đức dựa trên bằng chứng (n = 35) báo cáo QIs, được xác định trong một nghiên cứu trước. Ngoài ra, chúng tôi đã tìm kiếm trên các trang web của các nhà cung cấp CPG cụ thể để lấy các tài liệu riêng biệt liên quan đến QIs. Chúng tôi đã bao gồm các CPGs dựa trên bằng chứng báo cáo QIs. Các QIs được báo cáo, khuyến nghị từ hướng dẫn cơ sở và thông tin về phương pháp phát triển đã được trích xuất. Việc lựa chọn và trích xuất CPGs được thực hiện bởi một người đánh giá và được kiểm tra bởi một người khác. Đối với mỗi cặp CPGs được khớp, chúng tôi đã đánh giá xem các QIs đề xuất có phù hợp hay không thể so sánh trực tiếp. Hai mươi lăm CPG quốc tế, xuất phát từ bảy nhà cung cấp CPG khác nhau, đáp ứng tiêu chí bao gồm. Chúng phù hợp với các chủ đề của 18 CPG Đức. Điều này dẫn đến 30 cặp CPGs cho việc so sánh QIs (một số CPG quốc tế phù hợp với chủ đề của hơn một CPG Đức). Chúng tôi tìm thấy 27 cặp QIs có QIs “không khác nhau hoặc khác nhau một chút”, tương ứng với 13% (27 trong số 212) của các QIs trong CPGs Đức và 16% (27 trong số 166) trong các CPG quốc tế. Chỉ có hai cặp QIs được đánh giá là “khác nhau/không đồng nhất”. Đối với 183 trong số 212 (86%) QIs từ CPG Đức và 137 trong số 166 (83%) QIs từ các CPG quốc tế, không thể thực hiện so sánh trực tiếp. Một liên kết rõ ràng đến một hoặc nhiều khuyến nghị hướng dẫn đã được tìm thấy cho 136 trong số 152 (89%) QIs từ CPGs Đức và 82 trong số 166 (49%) QIs từ các CPG quốc tế. Một số thông tin về phương pháp phát triển QIs tồn tại cho 12 trong số 18 (67%) CPG Đức và 8 trong số 25 (32%) CPG quốc tế. Phần lớn các QIs trong các CPG Đức và quốc tế là không thể so sánh. Có nhiều lý do khác nhau cho điều này. Cần có báo cáo minh bạch hơn về các phương pháp cơ sở để tạo ra các QIs dựa trên hướng dẫn.

Từ khóa

#Hướng dẫn thực hành lâm sàng #chỉ số chất lượng #phương pháp luận #so sánh quốc tế #căn cứ bằng chứng

Tài liệu tham khảo

Lawrence M, Frede O. Indicators of quality in health care. Eur J Gen Pract. 1997;3:103–8. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Characteristics of clinical indicators. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1989;15(11):330–9. K Edward and H. Jermy, Health care quality indicators project conceptual framework paper. 2006: OECD Health Working Papers: 23, https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/36262363.pdf. Accessed 08 May 2017. Reiter A, et al. QUALIFY--a tool for assessing quality indicators. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(10):683–8. National Quality Forum. Measure evaluation criteria and guidance for evaluating measures for endorsement. 2016. http://www.qualityforum.org/Measuring_Performance/Endorsed_Performance_Measures_Maintenance.aspx. Accessed 08 May 2017. Geraedts M, Selbmann HK, Ollenschlaeger G. Critical appraisal of clinical performance measures in Germany. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(1):79–85. Campbell SM, et al. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(4):358–64. Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):523–30. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Performance Measures, P., and Performance Improvement Programs, Performance measurement: accelerating improvement (Pathways to Quality Health Care Series). 2006, The National Academies Press Washington, DC: http://www.nap.edu. Accessed 08 May 2017. Kötter T, Blozik E, Scherer M. Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2012;7:21. German Guideline Program in Oncology (German Cancer Society, German Cancer Aid, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies). Development of guideline-based quality indicators: methodology for the German Guideline Program in Oncology, version 2.0 2017. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/methodik/information-zur-methodik/. Accessed 25 June 2019. German Medical Association (GMA), National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP), and Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). National Programme for Disease Management Guidelines. Method Report. 4th. 2010. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/methodik/reports. Accessed 08 May 2017. Nothacker MJ, Langer T, Weinbrenner S. Quality indicators for National Disease Management Guidelines using the example of the National Disease Management Guideline for “Chronic Heart Failure”. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(1):27–37. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF)- Ständige Kommission Leitlinien, AWMF-Regelwerk “Leitlinien”. 2012. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/awmf-regelwerk.html. Accessed 08 May 2017. Schmitt J, et al. Recommendations for quality indicators in German S3 guidelines: a critical appraisal. Gesundheitswesen. 2014;76(12):819–26. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF). S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge maligner Ovarialtumoren, Langversion 1.0 2013 AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 032-035OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Nothacker M, et al. Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures. Implement Sci. 2016;11:6. Blozik E, et al. Simultaneous development of guidelines and quality indicators -- how do guideline groups act? A worldwide survey. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(8):712–29. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. Becker M, et al. Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):5. World Health Organization. List of Member States by WHO Region and Mortality Stratum. http://www.who.int/choice/demography/mortality_strata/en/. Accessed 20 Oct 2017. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The NICE menu of general practice and clinical commissioning group indicators. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/standards-and-indicators. Accessed 25 June 2019. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management. 2015. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17. Accessed 07 July 2017. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. 2015. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28. Accessed 21 Mar 2017. Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(11):356–60. Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49. German Association of the Scientific Medical societies (AWMF) and Agency for Quality in Medicine (ÄZQ). German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal 2008: http://www.delbi.de/. Accessed 08 May 2017. Lerut T, Stordeur S, Verleye L, Vlayen J, Boterberg T, De Hertogh G, De Mey J, Deprez P, Flamen P, Pattyn P, Van Laethem J-L, Peeters M. Update van de praktijkrichtlijn voor slokdarm- en maagkanker. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidscentrum (KCE). KCE Report 179A. D/2012/10.273/32. 2012. https://kce.fgov.be/en/update-of-the-national-guideline-on-upper-gastrointestinal-cancer. Accessed 15 Sept 2017. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obesity: identification, assessment and management. 2014. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/cg189. Accessed 14 Mar 2017. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Weight management: lifestyle services for overweight or obese adults. 2014. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ph 53. Accessed 16 Mar 2017. Fitch A, Everling L, Fox C, Goldberg J, Heim C, Johnson K, Kaufman T, Kennedy E, Kestenbaun C, Lano M, Leslie D, Newell T, O’Connor P, Slusarek B, Spaniol A, Stovitz S, Webb B. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Prevention and Management of Obesity for Adults. Updated May 2013. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Bipolar disorder: assessment and management. 2014. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/cg185. Accessed 03 Mar 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2011. (SIGN publication no. 126). [Revised August 2016]. http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 26 Mar 2017. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. 2015. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3. Accessed 21 Mar 2017. Working Group of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Diabetes mellitus type 1. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes mellitus type 1. Quality Plan for the National Health Service of the Ministry of Health and Social Policy. Agency for Health Technology Assessment from the Basque Country -Osteba, 2012. http://www.guiasalud.es/GPC/GPC_513_Diabetes_1_Osteba_compl_en.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017. Redmon B, Caccamo D, Flavin P, Michels R, O’Connor P, Roberts J, Smith S, Sperl-Hillen J. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults. Updated July 2014. https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_endocrine_guidelines/diabetes/. Accessed 21 Mar 2017. Card R, Sawyer M, Degnan B, Harder K, Kemper J, Marshall M, Matteson M, Roemer R, Schuller-Bebus G, Swanson C, Stultz J, Sypura W, Terrell C, Varela N. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Perioperative protocol. Updated March 2014. https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_patient_safetyreliability_guidelines/perioperative/. Accessed 20 Mar 2017. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management. Update August 2016. http://nice.org.uk/guidance/cg44. Accessed 30 Mar 2017. Goertz M, Thorson D, Bonsell J, Bonte B, Campbell R, Haake B, Johnson K, Kramer C, Mueller B, Peterson S, Setterlund L, Timming R. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Adult acute and subacute low back pain. Updated November 2012. Hooten M, Thorson D, Bianco J, Bonte B, Clavel Jr A, Hora J, Johnson C, Kirksson E, Noonan MP, Reznikoff C, Schweim K, Wainio J, Walker N. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Pain: Assessment, non-opioid treatment approaches and opioid management. Updated September 2016. https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_neurological_guidelines/pain/. Accessed 09 June 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic pain. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013. (SIGN publication no. 136). http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 03 Mar 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Treatment of primary breast cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013. (SIGN publication no. 134). http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 24 Mar 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Cutaneous melanoma. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2017. (SIGN publication no. 146). http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 21 Mar 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013. (SIGN publication no. 135). http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 26 Mar 2017. McCusker M, Ceronsky L, Crone C, Epstein H, Greene B, Halvorson J, Kephart K, Mallen E, Nosan B, Rohr M, Rosenberg E, Ruff R, Schlecht K, Setterlund L. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Palliative care for adults. Updated November 2013. Multidisciplinary VTE Prophylaxis BESt Team, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: Best evidence statement venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in children and adolescents. http://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/service/j/anderson-center/evidence-based-care/bests/. BESt 181, pages 1-14, Date 2/18/14. Accessed 20 March 2017. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2010. (SIGN publication no. 122). [updated Oct 2014]. http://www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 07 June 2017. Bacchus CM, et al. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ. 2016;188(5):340–8. Bell N, et al. Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test. CMAJ. 2014;186(16):1225–34. Brauer P, et al. Recommendations for prevention of weight gain and use of behavioural and pharmacologic interventions to manage overweight and obesity in adults in primary care. CMAJ. 2015;187(3):184–95. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF). Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Qualität S3 zur Früherkennung, Diagnose und Therapie der verschiedenen Stadien des Prostatakarzinoms, Langversion 3.1 2014 AWMF Registernummer: 034/022OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 19 June 2017. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz – Langfassung, 1. Auflage. Version 5. 2010, zuletzt verändert: Oktober 2015. AWMF Registernummer: nvl/007. http://www.kreuzschmerz.versorgungsleitlinien.de. Accessed 19 June 2017. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaft-lichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Diabetes – Strukturierte Schulungsprogramme – Langfassung, 1. Auflage. Version 4. 2012. AWMF Registernummer: nvl-001f. http://www.dm-schulung.versorgungsleitlinien.de. Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Adipositas-Gesellschaft (DAG). Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Qualität S3 zur, “Prävention und Therapie der Adipositas” 2014. AWMF Registernummer 050/001. http://www.awmf.org. Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) e.V. und Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) e.V. S3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik und Therapie Bipolarer Störungen. Langversion, 2012. AWMF Registernummer: 038-019. http://www.awmf.org. Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Diabetes-Gesellschaft. S3-Leitlinie “Diabetes und Schwangerschaft” 2014. AWMF Registernummer: 057/023. http://www.awmf.org. Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. S3-Leitlinie “Indiaktion und Methodik der Hysterektomie bei benignen Erkrankungen” 2015. AWMF Registernummer: 015/070. http://www.awmf.org. Accessed 26 June 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 1.1, 2014. AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 021-007OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft. S3 - Leitlinie „Langzeitanwendung von Opioiden bei nicht tumorbedingten Schmerzen – “LONTS” 2015. AWMF Registernummer: 145/003. http://www.awmf.org Accessed 19 June 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Adenokarzinome des Magens und ösophagogastralen Übergangs, 2012. AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 032-009OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 19 June 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms, 2012. AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 032 – 045OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 13 July 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Melanoms, Langversion 2.0, 2016, AWMF Registernummer: 032/024OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Melanom.65.0.html. Accessed 19 June 2017. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wis-senschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Nierenerkrankungen bei Diabetes im Erwachsenenalter – Langfassung, 1. Auflage. Version 6. 2010, zuletzt verändert: September 2015. http://www.dm-nierenerkrankungen.versorgungsleitlinien.de. Accessed 19 June 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus, Langversion 1.0, 2015, AWMF Registernummer: 021/023OL. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html. Accessed 19 June 2017. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Palliativmedizin für Patienten mit einer nicht heilbaren Krebserkrankung, Langversion 1.1, 2015, AWMF-Registernummer: 128/001OL. http://leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/Palliativmedizin.80.0.html. Accessed 23 June 2017. AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement. S3-Leitlinie “Prophylaxe der venösen Thromboembolie (VTE)” 2015. http://www.awmf.org Accessed 19 June 2017. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, et al., S3 Leitlinie “Vermeidung von perioperativer Hypothermie” 2014. AWMF Registernummer: 001/018. http://www.awmf.org Accessed 19 June 2017. van Lieshout J, et al. Consistency of performance indicators for cardiovascular risk management across procedures and panels. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e31. Shekelle PG, et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA. 2001;286(12):1461–7. Marshall MN, et al. Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(1):8–12. van der Ploeg E, et al. Developing quality indicators for general practice care for vulnerable elders; transfer from US to The Netherlands. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(4):291–5. Petzold T, et al. Quality measurement recommendations relevant to clinical guidelines in Germany and the United Kingdom: (what) can we learn from each other? Inquiry. 2018;55:46958018761495. Bennett B, et al. The NICE process for developing quality standards and indicators. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):481–6. Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. Bmj. 2016;353:i2089. Guyatt G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94. Gill PJ, et al. Primary care quality indicators for children: measuring quality in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(629):e752–7. Campbell SM, et al. Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes framework. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:85. Stelfox HT, Straus SE. Measuring quality of care: considering conceptual approaches to quality indicator development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(12):1328–37. Woitha K, et al. Testing feasibility and reliability of a set of quality indicators to evaluate the organization of palliative care across Europe: a pilot study in 25 countries. Palliat Med. 2015;29(2):157–63. Young GJ, Charns MP, Barbour GL. Quality improvement in the US Veterans Health Administration. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997;9(3):183–8. Johnston A, et al. Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;108:64–76.