Grounding language in action
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Burgess, C., &Lund, K. (1997). Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space.Language & Cognitive Processes,12, 177–210.
Chomsky, N. (1980).Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., &O'Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.Language,64, 501–538.
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models.Memory & Cognition,29, 336–343.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions.Discourse Processes,28, 1–26.
Glenberg, A. M., &Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 379–401.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995).A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaschak, M. P., &Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 508–529.
Kay, P., &Fillmore,C. J. (1999).Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: TheWhat's X doing Y? construction.Language,75, 1–33.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., &Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 115–126.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Lakoff, G. (1987).Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. (1992).Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meltzoff, A. N., &Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model.Early Development & Parenting,6, 179–192.
Michaelis, L., &Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition.Language,72, 215–247.
Novick, L. R., & Cheng, P. W. (in press). Assessing interactive causal influence.Psychological Review.
Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., &Jacoby, S. (1996). “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.),Interaction and grammar (pp. 328–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
O'Regan, J. K., &Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 939–1031.
Roth, W.-M. (1999). Discourse and agency in school science laboratories.Discourse Processes,28, 27–60.
Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–517). San Diego: Academic Press.
Stanfield, R. A., &Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.Psychological Science,12, 153–156.
Tucker, M., &Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 830–846.
Van Den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–589). San Diego: Academic Press.