Green energy mismatch, industrial intelligence and economics growth: theory and empirical evidence from China

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 24 - Trang 11785-11816 - 2021
Yunwei Li1, Qiuping Ji2, Zijie Wang3, Zishan Xiong4, Simeng Zhan5, Yiping Yang6, Yu Hao7,3,8,9,10
1Graduate School of Education and Institute of Economics of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
2School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
3School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
4School of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
5School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
6School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
7Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
8Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental Management, Beijing, China
9Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, Beijing, China
10Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China

Tóm tắt

With the continuous uptick in world energy consumption, green energy plays an increasingly significant role in alleviating energy depletion and promoting economic development. Due to regional differences, transportation restrictions, national policies and other reasons, there is a mismatch between green energy needs and resources across regions in China, which leads to misallocation of capital and labor between heavily polluting and nonpolluting enterprises. In this context, this paper first proposes a new measurement method: namely, the capital and labor mismatch index. Panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2018 are utilized to calculate the index. The results show significant resource mismatch across provinces in China. In addition, we extend the green Solow model by combining capital mismatch, technological progress and environmental regulation into a dynamic analysis framework of economic growth. The empirical results show that all three factors have significant spatial spillover effects. Specifically, capital misallocation exerts a strong negative impact on economic growth, while the other factors increase it.

Tài liệu tham khảo