Graphical versus textual software measurement modelling: an empirical study

Ahmad, R. (1999). Visual languages: A new way of programming. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 12(1), 76–81.

Apple. (2010a). Automator, from www.macosxautomation.com/automator . Accessed May 2010.

Apple. (2010b). appleScript, from http://www.macosxautomation.com/applescript/ ). Accessed May 2010.

Arpaia, P., Buzio, M., Fiscarelli, L., Inglese, V., Commara, G. L., & Walckiers, L. (2009). Measurement-domain specific language for magnetic test specifications at CERN. 2009 IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, CERN/TE 2009-002, 1716–1720.

Basili, V. R., Shull, F., & Lanubile, F. (1999). Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4), 456–473.

Bézivin, J. (2004). In search of a basic principle for model-driven engineering [Special Issue]. Novatica Journal, 5, 21–24.

Bézivin, J., Jouault, F., & Touzet, D. (2005). Principles, standards and tools for model engineering. 10th IEEE international conference on engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS’2005), 28–29.

Cook, S. (2004). Domain-specific modeling and model driven architecture. In D. S. Frankel & J. Parodi (Eds.), The MDA journal: Model driven architecture straight from the masters (Chap. 5, pp. 1–10). Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.

Cunniff, N., & Taylor, R. P. (1987). Graphical vs. textual representation: An empirical study of novices’ program comprehension. Empirical studies of programmers: Second workshop, pp. 114–131.

Deursen, A. v., Klint, P., & Visser, J. (2000). Domain-specific languages: An annotated bibliography. SIGPLAN Notices, 35(6), 26–36.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2005). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Feilkas, M. (2006). How to represent models, languages and transformations? Proceedings of the 6th OOPSLA workshop on domain-specific modeling (DSM’06), pp. 204–213.

Fenton, N., & Pfleeger, S. L. (1997). Software metrics: A rigorous & practical approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Company.

García, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruíz, F., Piattini, M., et al. (2006). Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information & Software Technology, 48(8), 631–644.

García, F., Ruiz, F., Cruz, J., & Piattini, M. (2003). Integrated measurement for the evaluation and improvement of software processes. Proceedings of the 9th European workshop on software process technology (EWSPT’9), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2786, pp. 94–111.

García, F., Serrano, M., Cruz-Lemus, J., Ruiz, F., & Piattini, M. (2007). Managing software process measurement: A metamodel-based approach. Information Sciences, 177, 2570–2586.

Genero, M., Moody, D., & Piattini, M. (2005). Assessing the capability of internal metrics as early indicators of maintenance effort through experimentation. Journal of Software Maintenance, 17(3), 225–246.

Green, T. R. G., Petre, M., & Bellamy, R. K. E. (1991). Comprehensibility of visual and textual programs: A test of superlativism against the match-mismatch conjecture. 4th workshop on empirical studies of programmers, pp. 121–146.

Guerra, E., Lara, J. d., & Díaz, P. (2008). Visual specification of measurements and redesigns for domain specific visual languages. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 19(3), 399–425.

Hull, D., Wolstencroft, K., Stevens, R., Goble, C., Pocock, M., Li, P., & Oin, T. (2006). Taverna: A tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(Web Server issue) pp. 729–732.

ISO/IEC. (2001). ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software engineering-software product quality—Part 1: Quality model. Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization.

Jedlitschka, A., & Ciolkowski, M. (2005). Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering. ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering, pp. 95–195.

Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I., & Valduriez, P. (2006). ATL: A QVT-like transformation language. Companion to the 21th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, OOPSLA 2006, pp. 719–720.

Jouault, F., & Bézivin, J. (2006). KM3: A DSL for metamodel specification. Formal methods for open object-based distributed systems, 8th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference, FMOODS 2006, 4037, pp. 171–185.

Juristo, N., & Moreno, A. M. (2001). Basics of software engineering experimentation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Karsai, G., Krahn, H., Pinkernell, C., Rumpe, B., Schindler, M., & Völkel, S. (2009). Design guidelines for domain specific languages. The 9th OOPSLA workshop on domain-specific modeling, pp. 7–13.

Kelly, S., & Pohjonen, R. (2009). Worst practices for domain-specific modeling. IEEE Software, 26(4), 22–29.

Kitchenham, B. A., Pfleeger, S. L., Pickard, L. M., Jones, P. W., Hoaglin, D. C., Emam, K. E., et al. (2002). Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8), 721–734.

Kolovos, D. S., Paige, R. F., Kelly, T., & Polack, F. A. C. (2006). Requirements for domain-specific languages. First ECOOP workshop on domain-specific program development (ECOOP’06).

Kurtev, I., Bézivin, J., Jouault, F., & Valduriez, P. (2006). Model-based DSL frameworks. OOPSLA Companion 2006, pp. 602–616.

Mernik, M., Heering, J., & Sloane, A. M. (2005). When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 37(4), 316–344.

Moher, T. G., Mak, D. C., Blumenthal, B., & Leventahal, L. M. (1993). Comparing the comprehensibility of textual and graphical programs: The case of petri nets. Palo Alto, pp. 137–161.

Mora, B., García, F., Ruiz, F., & Piattini, M. (2008b). SMML: Software measurement modeling language. The 8th OOPSLA workshop on domain-specific modeling, pp. 52–59.

Mora, B., García, F., Ruiz, F., & Piattini, M. (2009). Model-driven software measurement framework: A case study. The 9th international conference on quality software, QSIC 2009, pp. 239–248.

Mora, B., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M., Boronat, A., Gómez, A., Carsí, J. Á., & Ramos, I. (2008a). Software measurement by using QVT transformation in an MDA context. 10th International conference on enterprise information systems—ICEIS 2008, 1, pp. 117–124.

Mora, B., Ruiz, F., Garcia, F., & Piattini, M. (2008c). SMML: Software measurement modeling language, Department of Computer Science. University of Castilla—La Mancha, from http://www.uclm.es/dep/tsi/pdf/SMML_Software_Measurement_Modeling_Language.pdf .

Oinn, T., Greenwood, M., Addis, M., Alpdemir, N., Ferris, J., Glover, K., et al. (2006). Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(10), 1067–1100.

OMG. (2003). OCL 2.0—OMG final adopted specification, Object Management Group.

OMG. (2005a). Query/view/transformation (QVT) Standard Specification.

OMG. (2005b). UML specification: Superstructure version 2.0, Object Management Group, from http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/05-07-04.pdf .

Özgür, T. (2007). Comparison of Microsoft DSL tools and eclipse modeling frameworks for domain-specific modeling in the context of the model driven development. School of Engineering. Ronneby, Sweden, Blekinge Institute of Technology: p. 56.

Pandey, R. K., & Burnett, M. M. (1993). Is it easier to write matrix manipulation programs visually or textually? An empirical study. IEEE symposium on visual languages, pp. 344–351.

Patig, S. (2008). A practical guide to testing the understandability of notations. Fifth Asia-Pacific conference on conceptual modelling (APCCM 2008), pp. 49–55.

Pelechano, V., Albert, M., Javier, M., & Carlos, C. (2006). Building tools for model driven development comparing Microsoft DSL tools and eclipse modeling plug-ins. Desarrollo de Software Dirigido por Modelos—DSDM’06.

Shneiderman, B., Mayer, R., McKay, D., & Heller, P. (1977). Experimental investigations of the utility of detailed flowcharts in programming. Communications of the ACM, 20(6), 373–381.

Shull, F., Carver, J. C., Vegas, S., & Juzgado, N. J. (2008). The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 13(2), 211–218.

Völter, M. (2009). MD* Best practices. Journal of Object Technology, 8(6), 79–102.

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2000). Experimentation in software engineering: An introduction, International Series in Software Engineering.

Yoder, M., & Black, B. (2006). A study of graphical vs. textual programming for teaching DSP. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.

Zhao, Y., Hategan, M., Clifford, B., Foster, I., Laszewski, G. V., Raicu, I., et al. (2007). Swift: Fast, reliable, loosely coupled parallel computation. 2007 IEEE Congress on Services, pp. 199–206.