Government secondary school finances in New South Wales: accounting for students’ prior achievements in a two-stage DEA at the school level
Tóm tắt
This study measures the efficiency of government secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia, using a two-stage semi-parametric production frontier approach to schooling. In contrast to previous research comparing school performance with two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA), we control for prior academic achievement of students by using a rich data set from 2008 to 2010. We employ detailed financial data for deriving the envelope for the efficient production frontier of the schools. Using Simar and Wilson’s (J Econ 136:31-64, 2007, J Prod Anal 36:205-218, 2011a) double bootstrap procedure for two-stage DEA, the study finds that schools with lower total student numbers, a higher average of years of service of teachers, a higher ratio of special education students that attracts extra government funding, and girls only do better than other schools. On the other hand, a negative influence comes from a school’s location in provincial and outer metropolitan areas. An important result is that the socio-economic background of students attending a school has no significant effect on their academic performance, whereas higher prior academic achievements have a positive and statistically significant impact on student achievement. These results are relevant to decision makers for the school sector, in particular for funding criteria contained in the Gonski (Review of funding for schooling - Final report (December). Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia, 2011) review report.
Tài liệu tham khảo
ACARA (2010) NAPLAN Achievement in reading, writing, language conventions and numeracy: Report for 2010. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority, Sydney
Alexander RJ, Haug AA, Jaforullah M (2010) A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. J Prod Anal 34:99–110
Bădin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2012) How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model. European J Operat Res 223:818–833
Blackburn V, Brennan S, Ruggiero J (2014a) Nonparametric estimation of educational production and costs using data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, New York, Volume 214
Blackburn V, Brennan S, Ruggiero J (2014b) Measuring efficiency in Australian schools: a preliminary analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 48:4–9
Bradley S, Draca M, Green C (2004) School performance in Australia: is there a role for quasi-markets. The Australian Econ Rev 37:271–286
Chakraborty K, Blackburn V (2013) Efficiency and equity in funding for government schools in Australia. Australia Econ Papers 52:127–142
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Thrall RM (1986) Identifying and classifying scale and technical efficiencies in oberved data via data envelopment analysis. Oper Res Lett 5:105–110
Cook WW, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty years on. European J Operat Res 192:1–17
Daraio C, Simar L, Wilson PW (2016) Nonparametric estimation of efficiency in the presence of environmental variables. Technical Report N. 2, La Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Series A 120:253–281
Gonski D (2011) Review of funding for schooling - Final report (December). Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra
Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ, Taylor LL (2014a) Efficiency in education: research and implications. Appl Econ Perspect and Policy 36:175–210
Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ, Taylor LL (2014b) Applied efficiency analysis in education. Econ and Bus Lett 3:19–26
Hanushek EA (2013) Economic growth in developing countries: the role of human capital. Econ of Edu 37:204–212
Hanushek EA, Woessmann L (2007) The role of education quality in economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4122
Hanushek EA (2005) The economics of school quality. German Econ Rev 6:269–286
Hanushek EA (2003) The failure of input-based schooling policies. Econ J 113:F64–F98
Hanushek EA (1986) The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. J Econ Lit 24:1141–1177
Kneip A, Park BU, Simar L (1998) A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimates for production efficiency scores. Econ Theory 14:783–793
Lamb S, Rumberger R, Jesson D, Teese R (2004) School performance in Australia: Results from analyses of school effectiveness. Centre for Post-Compulsory Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Report for the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet
Mante B, O’Brien G (2002) Efficiency measurement of Australian public sector organizations: the case of state secondary schools in Victoria. J Edu Admin 40:274–296
Marks GN (2015a) Do catholic and independent schools “add-value” to students’ tertiary entrance performance? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Australian J Edu 59:133–157
Marks GN (2015b) Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Rev of Edu 41:122–144
Marks GN (2010) What aspects of schooling are important? School effects on tertiary entrance performance. Sch Eff Sch Improv 21:267–287
Marks GN, McMillan J, Hillman K (2001) Tertiary entrance performance: the role of student background and school factors. LSAY Research Reports. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report No. 22, http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/24
Miller PW, Voon D (2014) School outcomes in New South Wales and Queensland: a regression discontinuity approach. Edu Econ 22:427–448
Miller PW, Voon D (2011) Lessons from my school. Australian Econ Rev 44:366–386
Mok M, Flynn M (1996) School size and academic achievement in the HSC examination: is there a relationship. Issues in Edu Leadership 6:57–78
Oaxaca R (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Internat Econ Rev 14:693–709
Perry LB, McConney A (2010) Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teach Coll Rec 112:1137–1162
Productivity Commission - Report on Government Services (2014) School education. Volume B, Attachment Table 4A, Tables 4A.1-4A.135. Retrieved on 12 March 2016 at: http://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2014/child-care,-education-and-training/download-the-volume/rogs-2014-volumeb-child-care-education-and-training.pdf
Shephard RW (1953) Cost and prod functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Simar L (1996) Aspects of statistical analysis in DEA-type frontier models. J Prod Anal 7:177–185
Simar L, Wilson PW (2011a) Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. J Prod Anal 36:205–218
Simar L, Wilson PW (2011b) Inference by the m out of n bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. J Prod Anal 36:33–53
Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econ 136:31–64
Simar L, Wilson PW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci 44:49–61
Wilson PW (2008) FEAR 1.0: A software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Soc-Econ Plan Sci 42:247–254
Worthington AC (2001) An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Edu Econ 9:245–268