Gout‐Related Health Care Utilization in US Emergency Departments, 2006 Through 2008

Arthritis Care and Research - Tập 65 Số 4 - Trang 571-577 - 2013
Rohini Garg1, Harlan Sayles2, Fang Yu2, Kaleb Michaud2, Jasvinder A. Singh3, Kenneth G. Saag3, Ted R. Mikuls4
1Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska
2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
3University of Alabama at Birmingham
4University of Nebraska Medical Center and Omaha VA Medical Center, Omah

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectiveTo characterize gout‐related emergency department (ED) utilization using a nationally representative sample and to examine factors associated with the frequency and charges of gout‐related ED visits.MethodsUsing the National Emergency Department Sample data from 2006–2008, the weighted national frequency of gout visits was calculated along with the median ED charge and total national ED‐related charges. Associations of several patient‐ and facility‐level factors were examined with the occurrence of gout visits using multivariable logistic regression and with ED‐related charges using multivariable linear regression.ResultsGout was the primary indication for 168,410 ED visits in 2006, 171,743 visits in 2007, and 174,823 visits in 2008, accounting for ∼0.2% of all visits annually and generating ED charges of more than $128 million in 2006, $144 million in 2007, and $166 million in 2008. Age, male sex, household income <$39,000, private insurance, and hospital locations in nonmetropolitan areas and the southern US were associated with an increased propensity for ED utilization in gout. Higher ED‐related charges for gout were associated with female sex, age, a higher number of coded diagnoses, and a metropolitan residence.ConclusionGout accounts for a substantial proportion of ED visits, leading to significant health care charges. Effective strategies to reduce gout burden in EDs could potentially benefit by targeting groups characterized by factors demonstrated to be related to a higher ED utilization in gout as identified by our study.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/art.30520

Arromdee E, 2002, Epidemiology of gout: is the incidence rising?, J Rheumatol, 29, 2403

10.1002/art.1780160402

Hahn PC, 2005, Arthritis and allied conditions: a textbook of rheumatology, 2341

10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00173.x

10.1001/archinte.168.10.1104

10.3899/jrheum.080487

10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.07.001

10.2500/aap.2010.31.3358

10.1097/01.MLR.0000045021.70297.9F

10.4065/81.7.925

10.1002/art.22767

10.1016/0049-0172(82)90065-8

10.1007/s11926-009-0019-z

10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.040

10.1002/acr.21580

10.1002/acr.21563

10.1148/rg.315115510

10.1056/NEJMoa050373

10.1001/jama.2011.1169

10.1097/01.rhu.0000209882.50228.9f

10.1002/art.24209

10.1002/art.22437

De Souza AW, 2005, Female gout: clinical and laboratory features, J Rheumatol, 32, 2186

Meyers OL, 1986, A comparison of gout in men and women: a 10‐year experience, S Afr Med J, 70, 721

10.1136/ard.2006.051649

10.1056/NEJM199603073341007