Good and poor adherence: optimal cut-point for adherence measures using administrative claims data

Current Medical Research and Opinion - Tập 25 Số 9 - Trang 2303-2310 - 2009
Sudeep Karve1, Mario A. Cleves2, Mark Helm2, Teresa J. Hudson2, Donna West3, Bradley C. Martin2
1The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
2University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
3The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x

10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00268-5

10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.864

10.2337/diacare.28.3.595

Bramley TJ, 2006, J Manag Care Pharm, 12, 239, 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.3.239

10.2337/diacare.25.6.1015

10.2146/ajhp040419

10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.692

10.1001/archinte.166.17.1836

10.2337/diacare.27.9.2149

10.1097/01.mlr.0000163641.86870.af

10.1592/phco.26.6.779

10.1097/00005650-200208000-00002

10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00026

10.1097/01.mlr.0000207817.32496.cb

10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00139.x

10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817924d2

Karve S, 2009, Value Health, 23

Karve SJ, Cleves M, Helm M, et al. Which adherence measure to choose? Prospective validation of 8 different adherence measures using administrative claims data for persons with cardiovascular disease 2008. Unpublished Work

10.1345/aph.1H018

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990228)18:4<375::AID-SIM20>3.0.CO;2-J

10.1373/clinchem.2007.096529

Kutner MH, 2005, Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5

10.1001/jama.288.4.455

10.1345/aph.1K671

Andrade SE, 2004, Am J Manag Care, 10, 481

10.1097/01.jcp.0000231536.79175.cd

Kalsekar I, 2006, J Manag Care Pharm, 12, 121, 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.2.121

10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.005

10.1176/appi.ps.55.8.886

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01704.x