Goal-directed therapy: hit early and personalize!

Bernd Saugel1, Frédèric Michard2, Thomas Scheeren3
1Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
2MiCo, Denens, Switzerland
3Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795–815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z .

Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, Payen D, Perel A, Hoeft A, Romagnoli S, Ranieri VM, Ichai C, Forget P, Della Rocca G, Rhodes A. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7 .

Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Reuter DA, Rhodes A, Squara P, Vincent JL, Scheeren TW. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1350–9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7 .

Cronhjort M, Wall O, Nyberg E, Zeng R, Svensen C, Martensson J, Joelsson-Alm E. Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0032-0 .

Vistisen ST, Keus E, Scheeren TWL. Methodology in systematic reviews of goal-directed therapy: improving but not perfect. Br J Anaesth. 2017. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex206 .

Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1686–92.

Michard F, Giglio MT, Brienza N. Perioperative goal-directed therapy with uncalibrated pulse contour methods: impact on fluid management and postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2017. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex138 .

Malbrain ML, Reuter DA. Hemodynamic treatment algorithms should follow physiology or they fail to improve outcome. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2923–4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825f6cd0 .

Teboul JL, Monnet X, Perel A. Results of questionable management protocols are inherently questionable. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2536. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182545759 .

Saugel B, Vincent JL, Wagner JY. Personalized hemodynamic management. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000422 .

Shoemaker WC. Editorial: protocol medicine. Crit Care Med. 1974;2:279.

Molnar Z, Szabo Z, Nemeth M. Multimodal individualized concept of hemodynamic monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:171–7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000440 .

Saugel B, Huber W, Nierhaus A, Kluge S, Reuter DA, Wagner JY. Advanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic Shock. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:8268569. doi: 10.1155/2016/8268569 .

Clement RP, Vos JJ, Scheeren TWL. Minimally invasive cardiac output technologies in the ICU: putting it all together. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000417 .

Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1801–8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1570-9 .

Thiele RH, McMurry TL. Data agnosticism and implications on method comparison studies. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:264–6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000810 .

Squara P, Imhoff M, Cecconi M. Metrology in medicine: from measurements to decision, with specific reference to anesthesia and intensive care. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:66–75. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000000477 .

Montenij LJ, Buhre WF, Jansen JR, Kruitwagen CL, de Waal EE. Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:750–8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew094 .

Abu-Arafeh A, Jordan H, Drummond G. Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:569–75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew320 .

Hapfelmeier A, Cecconi M, Saugel B. Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:149–55. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9711-x .