Global flows of ecosystem services

Ecosystem Services - Tập 31 - Trang 229-230 - 2018
Thomas Koellner1, Matthias Schröter2, Catharina J.E. Schulp3, Peter H. Verburg4,3
1Professorship of Ecological Services (PES), Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Geosciences, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
2UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
3Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Environmental Geography Group, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
4Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bagstad, 2013, Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services, Ecosyst. Serv., 4, 117, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012

Erb, 2009, Embodied HANPP: mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption, Ecol. Econ., 69, 328, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.025

Drakou, 2018, Mapping the global distribution of locally-generated marine ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 279

Fridman, 2018, An integrated biophysical and ecosystem approach as a base for ecosystem services analysis across regions, Ecosyst. Serv., 1

IPBES, 2018. Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. M. Fischer, M. Rounsevell, A. Torre-Marin Rando, A. Mader, A. Church, M. Elbakidze, V. Elias, T. Hahn. P.A. Harrison, J. Hauck, B. Martín-López, I. Ring, C. Sandström, I. Sousa Pinto, P. Visconti and N.E Zimmermann (eds.)., Bonn, Germany.

Kastner, 2011, International wood trade and forest change: a global analysis, Global Environ. Change, 21, 947, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.003

Kissinger, 2011, Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 965, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.007

Koellner, T., (ed.), 2011. Ecosystem Services and Global Trade of Natural Resources. Ecology, Economics and Policies. Routledge, Abingdon.

Liu, 2015, Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships, Ecol. Soc., 20, 10.5751/ES-07868-200344

Liu, 2013, Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world, Ecol. Soc., 18, 10.5751/ES-05873-180226

Liu, 2016, Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene, Front. Ecol. Environ., 14, 27, 10.1002/16-0188.1

López-Hoffman, 2017, Ecosystem services from transborder migratory species: implications for conservation governance, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 42, 509, 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090119

Pascual, 2017, Off-stage ecosystem service burdens: a blind spot for global sustainability, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 075001, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392

Quatrini, 2018, Most finance to halt desertification also benefits multiple ecosystem services: a key to unlock investments in Land Degradation Neutrality?, Ecosyst. Serv., 266

Schröter, 2016, National ecosystem assessments in europe: a review, Bioscience, 66, 813, 10.1093/biosci/biw101

Schröter, 2017, Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability, Ecosyst. Serv., 25, 35, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.019

Schröter, 2018, Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases, Ecosyst. Serv., 1

Semmens, 2018, Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species, Ecosyst. Serv., 1

Serna-Chavez, 2014, A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services, Ecol. Indic., 39, 24, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024

Syrbe, 2012, Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics, Ecol. Indic., 21, 80, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013

Yu, 2013, Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use, Global Environ. Change, 23, 1178, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006