Thay đổi toàn cầu và chu trình thủy ngân: Thách thức trong việc thực hiện một hiệp ước thủy ngân toàn cầu

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry - Tập 33 Số 6 - Trang 1202-1210 - 2013
Noelle E. Selin1
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology; ,; Cambridge MA USA

Tóm tắt

tóm tắt

Công ước Minamata nhằm bảo vệ sức khỏe con người và môi trường trước các nguồn phát thải và xả thải thủy ngân do con người gây ra. Nghiên cứu hiện tại xem xét các điều khoản của Công ước Minamata để đánh giá ảnh hưởng của chúng đối với chu trình sinh địa hóa toàn cầu của thủy ngân (Hg). Mặc dù phạm vi của công ước bao trùm tất cả các danh mục phát thải khí quyển chính, nhưng mức độ mà nó sẽ ảnh hưởng đến các quỹ đạo phát thải trong tương lai vẫn chưa rõ ràng. Phân tích mô hình hộp cho thấy rằng chu trình sinh địa hóa toàn cầu trong tương lai dưới các điều kiện công nghệ dự kiến sẽ chủ yếu dẫn đến việc tránh được sự gia tăng, và sự khác biệt ước tính trong nồng độ khí quyển do các chính sách tạo ra sẽ vào khoảng 1% đến 2% mỗi năm. Kinh nghiệm hiện tại cho thấy rằng tri thức khoa học không đủ để quy kết nguyên nhân cho những thay đổi có quy mô như vậy. Một số cải tiến để nâng cao khả năng đo lường hiệu quả của Công ước Minamata được đề xuất, bao gồm cả việc đo lường và mô hình hóa. Environ Toxicol Chem 2014;33:1202–1210. © 2013 SETAC

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Selin, 2006, Global politics of mercury pollution: The need for multi-scale governance, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 15, 258, 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00529.x

Kohler, 2013, Summary of the Fifth Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to Prepare a Global Legally Binding Instrument on Mercury: 13–19 January 2013, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 28, 1

Selin, 2014, Global environmental law and treaty-making on hazardous substances: The Minamata Convention and mercury abatement, Global Environmental Politics., 10.1162/GLEP_a_00208

United Nations Environment Programme, 2002, Global Mercury Assessment

Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, 2011, Arctic Pollution 2011

Selin, 2009, Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: A review, Annu Rev Environ Resources, 34, 43, 10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314

Fitzgerald, 1998, The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas, Environ Sci Technol, 32, 1, 10.1021/es970284w

Sunderland, 2013, Future trends in environmental mercury concentrations: Implications for prevention strategies, Environ Health, 12, 2, 10.1186/1476-069X-12-2

Corbitt, 2011, Global source–receptor relationships for mercury deposition under present-day and 2050 emissions scenarios, Environ Sci Technol, 45, 10477, 10.1021/es202496y

Mason, 2012, Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications, Environ Res, 119, 101, 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013

United Nations Environment Programme, 2013

Sippl, 2012, Global policy for local livelihoods: Phasing out mercury in artisanal and small-scale gold mining, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 54, 18, 10.1080/00139157.2012.673452

Swain, 2007, Socioeconomic consequences of mercury use and pollution, AMBIO J Hum Environ, 36, 45, 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[45:SCOMUA]2.0.CO;2

Wilson, 2010, Updating Historical Global Inventories of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions to Air

Hylander, 2003, 500 years of mercury production: Global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions, Sci Total Environ, 304, 13, 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00553-3

Streets, 2011, All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities, Environ Sci Technol, 45, 10485, 10.1021/es202765m

Brooks, 2010, 2009 Minerals Yearbook: Mercury

Spiegel, 2006, Global Impacts of Mercury Supply and Demand in Small-Scale Gold Mining

Streets, 2009, Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 2983, 10.1021/es802474j

Holmes, 2010, Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by bromine atoms, Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 12037, 10.5194/acp-10-12037-2010

Selin, 2008, Global 3-D land–ocean–atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition, Global Biogeochem Cy, 22, 1

Mason, 2002, Role of the ocean in the global mercury cycle, Global Biogeochem Cy, 16, 10.1029/2001GB001440

Lamborg, 2002, Modern and historic atmospheric mercury fluxes in both hemispheres: Global and regional mercury cycling implications, Global Biogeochem Cy, 16, 10.1029/2001GB001847

Hudson, 1995, Anthropogenic influences on the global mercury cycle: A model-based analysis, Water Air Soil Pollut, 80, 265, 10.1007/BF01189676

Sprovieri, 2010, A review of worldwide atmospheric mercury measurements, Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 8245, 10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010

Slemr, 2011, Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1995, Atmos Chem Phys, 11, 4779, 10.5194/acp-11-4779-2011

Cole, 2010, Trends in long-term gaseous mercury observations in the Arctic and effects of temperature and other atmospheric conditions, Atmos Chem Phys, 10, 4661, 10.5194/acp-10-4661-2010

Amos, 2012, Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition, Atmos Chem Phys, 12, 591, 10.5194/acp-12-591-2012

Soerensen, Multi-decadal decline of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface seawater concentrations, Geophys Res Lett, 39, L21810

Friedli, 2009, Initial estimates of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from global biomass burning, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 3507, 10.1021/es802703g

Turetsky, 2006, Wildfires threaten mercury stocks in northern soils, Geophys Res Lett, 33, 10.1029/2005GL025595

Aguilar, 2012, Summary of the Fourth Meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to Prepare a Global Legally Binding Instrument on Mercury: 27 June to 2 July 2012, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 28, 1

United Nations Environment Programme, 2006

United Nations Environment Programme, 2009, 83

United Nations Environment Programme, 2009, 86

Ma, 2011, Revolatilization of persistent organic pollutants in the Arctic induced by climate change, Nat Climate Change, 1, 255, 10.1038/nclimate1167

United Nations Environment Programme, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, 2011, Climate Change and POPs: Predicting the Impacts

Mason, 2005, Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition, Environ Sci Technol, 39, 14, 10.1021/es053155l

Schmeltz, 2011, MercNet: A national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States, Ecotoxicology, 20, 1713, 10.1007/s10646-011-0756-4

Lohman, 2006, Modeling mercury in power plant plumes, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 3848, 10.1021/es051556v

Subir, 2011, A review of uncertainties in atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing kinetic parameters—Fundamental limitations and the importance of heterogeneous chemistry, Atmos Environ, 45, 5664, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.046

Sunderland, 2006, Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the U.S. seafood market, Environ Health Perspect, 115, 235, 10.1289/ehp.9377

Selin, 2011, Science and strategies to reduce mercury risks: A critical review, J Environ Monit, 13, 2389, 10.1039/c1em10448a

Selin, 2010, Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: Implications for policy, Environ Health Perspect, 18, 137, 10.1289/ehp.0900811

Selin, 2008, Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources, Atmos Environ, 42, 5193, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.069

Sunderland, 2007, Human impacts on open ocean mercury concentrations, Global Biogeochem Cy, 21, 1, 10.1029/2006GB002876

Qureshi, 2011, Quantifying uncertainties in the global mass balance of mercury, Global Biogeochem Cy, 25, 1, 10.1029/2011GB004068

Bullock, 2009, An analysis of simulated wet deposition of mercury from the North American Mercury Model Intercomparison Study, J Geophys Res, 114, 10.1029/2008JD011224

Bullock, 2008, The North American mercury model intercomparison study (NAMMIS): Study description and model-to-model comparisons, J Geophys Res, 113, 1, 10.1029/2008JD009803

Bodansky, 1995, Customary (and not so customary) international environmental law, Indiana J Global Legal Studies, 3, 105

Susskind, 2008, Strengthening the global environmental treaty system, Issues Sci Technol