Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large‐scale planting
Tóm tắt
In coastal and estuarine systems, foundation species like seagrasses, mangroves, saltmarshes or corals provide important ecosystem services. Seagrasses are globally declining and their reintroduction has been shown to restore ecosystem functions. However, seagrass restoration is often challenging, given the dynamic and stressful environment that seagrasses often grow in. From our world‐wide meta‐analysis of seagrass restoration trials (1786 trials), we describe general features and best practice for seagrass restoration. We confirm that removal of threats is important prior to replanting. Reduced water quality (mainly eutrophication), and construction activities led to poorer restoration success than, for instance, dredging, local direct impact and natural causes. Proximity to and recovery of donor beds were positively correlated with trial performance. Planting techniques can influence restoration success. The meta‐analysis shows that both trial survival and seagrass population growth rate in trials that survived are positively affected by the number of plants or seeds initially transplanted. This relationship between restoration scale and restoration success was not related to trial characteristics of the initial restoration. The majority of the seagrass restoration trials have been very small, which may explain the low overall trial survival rate (i.e. estimated 37%). Successful regrowth of the foundation seagrass species appears to require crossing a minimum threshold of reintroduced individuals. Our study provides the first global field evidence for the requirement of a critical mass for recovery, which may also hold for other foundation species showing strong positive feedback to a dynamic environment.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Addy C.E., 1947, Eel grass planting guide, Maryland Conservationist, 24, 16
Bruno J.F., 2001, Marine Community Ecology, 201
Campbell M.L., 2002, Getting the foundation right: a scientifically based management framework to aid in the planning and implementation of seagrass transplant efforts, Bulletin of Marine Science, 71, 1405
Fonseca M.S., 1998, Guidelines for the Conservation and Restoration of Seagrasses in the United States and Adjacent Waters
van Katwijk M.M.(2015)Data from “Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large‐scale planting” Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).http://dx.doi.org/10.17026/dans-x9h-expg.
Morris W.F., 2002, Quantitative Conservation Biology. Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis
Paling E.I., 2009, Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach, 687
Phillips R.C., 1980, Handbook of Seagrass Biology, 41
Thorhaug A., 1981, Biology and management of seagrass in the caribbean, Ambio, 10, 295
Thorhaug A., 2009, Carbon cycling and sequestration in the sea by marine macrophytes, Plant Science Bulletin, 55, 156