Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Shoulder and Elbow - Tập 13 Số 5 - Trang 509-517 - 2021
Betty Zhang1, Gavinn Niroopan2, Chetan Gohal2, Bashar Alolabi2, Timothy Leroux3, Moin Khan2
1DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
2Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
3Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

Background Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion. Results Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients. Conclusion Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted. Level of evidence IV

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bade HA, 1984, Surgery of the shoulder, 294

10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80062-2

Barrett W, Franklin J, Jackins S, et al. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1987; 69: 865–872.

10.2106/00004623-198971090-00003

10.2106/00004623-198466060-00010

10.1016/S0883-5403(88)80077-9

10.2106/00004623-198264030-00001

Wilde AH, 1984, Surgery of the shoulder, 224

10.2106/JBJS.L.00097

10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.016

10.2106/00004623-200106000-00009

Song DJ, Semin Arthroplasty

Higgins J, 2011, Cochrane Collab, 10

10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

10.2106/00004623-200301000-00001

Gazielly DF, 2014, Int Orthop, 37, 1093

10.1067/mse.2000.106921

10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.017

10.2106/00004623-198870080-00006

10.1007/s00264-009-0780-7

10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.005

10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.023

10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.012

10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.020

Jones RB, 2015, Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 73, S129

10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.014

10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.011

Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2005; 87(9 I): 2006–2011.

Iossifidis A, Ibrahim EF, Petrou C, Galanos A. The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score. Shoulder Elb [Internet]. 2015 Oct 1 [cited 2020 Apr 1]; 7(4): 256–267. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582986.

Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR. The Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 200; 36(3): 138–151.

Tingart M, Bäthis H, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Tiling T. [Constant Score and Neer Score. A comparison of score results and subjective patient satisfaction]. Unfallchirurg. 2001.

Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJH, S½jbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use [Internet]. Vol. 17, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008 [cited 2020 Apr 1]. p. 355–361.

Lippitt S, Harryman D, Matsen F. A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Am Acad Orthop Surg 1993; 501–518.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Shoulder and Elbow

Tập 13 Số 5

509-517

Thông tin tác giả