Giving meaning to patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction after mastectomy – A systematic review of available scores and suggestions for further research

Potter, 2015, Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery, Br J Surg, 102, 1360, 10.1002/bjs.9883 Potter, 2009, Health-related quality of life assessment after breast reconstruction, Br J Surg, 96, 613, 10.1002/bjs.6605 Sharma, 2019, Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: an introduction and review of clinical applications, Ann Plast Surg, 83, 247, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001894 Davies, 2021, Patient-reported outcome measures for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review of development and measurement properties, Ann Surg Oncol, 28, 386, 10.1245/s10434-020-08736-8 Guyatt, 2002, Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting G. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures, Mayo Clin Proc, 77, 371, 10.4065/77.4.371 Zhong, 2013, Future of outcomes research in plastic surgery, Clin Plast Surg, 40, 351, 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.009 Jaeschke, 1989, Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference, Contr Clin Trials, 10, 407, 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6 Crosby, 2003, Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life, J Clin Epidemiol, 56, 395, 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1 Arksey, 2005, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, Int J Soc Res Methodol, 8, 19, 10.1080/1364557032000119616 Cooke, 2012, Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis, Qual Health Res, 22, 1435, 10.1177/1049732312452938 Guyatt, 2008, GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, 336, 924, 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias), J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 407, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 1277, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 1283, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 1294, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017 Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 1303, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014 Klifto, 2020, Establishing institution-specific normative data for the BREAST-Q reconstruction module: a prospective study, Aesthetic Surg J, 40, NP348, 10.1093/asj/sjz296 Mundy, 2017, Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q, Plast Reconstr Surg, 139, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003186 Voineskos, 2020, Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients, Plast Reconstr Surg, 145, 11e, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006317 Cereijo-Garea, 2018, Predictive factors of satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q((c)), J Clin Nurs, 27, 1464, 10.1111/jocn.14291 Wild, 2005, Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation, Value Health, 8, 94, 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x Bowen, 2007, Possible socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in quality of life in a cohort of breast cancer survivors, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 106, 85, 10.1007/s10549-006-9479-2 Fatone, 2007, Urban voices: the quality-of-life experience among women of color with breast cancer, Palliat Support Care, 5, 115, 10.1017/S1478951507070186 Matthews, 2017, Predictors of satisfaction and quality of life following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction, Psycho Oncol, 26, 1860, 10.1002/pon.4397 Srinivasa, 2020, Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study, Plast Reconstr Surg, 145, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006543 Mehta, 2020, Worse overall health status negatively impacts satisfaction with breast reconstruction, J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg, 73, 2056, 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.093 Mehta, 2020, Patients with psychiatric illness report worse patient-reported outcomes and receive lower rates of autologous breast reconstruction, Breast J, 26, 1931, 10.1111/tbj.13936 Cella, 2002, Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting G. Group vs individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life, Mayo Clin Proc, 77, 384, 10.4065/77.4.384 Sprangers, 2002, Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting G. Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a users' guide for clinicians, Mayo Clin Proc, 77, 561, 10.4065/77.6.561 Metcalfe, 2012, Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction, Ann Surg Oncol, 19, 233, 10.1245/s10434-011-1828-7 Flitcroft, 2017, Women's expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review, Support Care Cancer, 25, 2631, 10.1007/s00520-017-3712-x Cordeiro, 2010, A quantitative comparison of psychological and emotional health measures in 360 plastic surgery candidates: is there a difference between aesthetic and reconstructive patients?, Ann Plast Surg, 65, 349, 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c1fe5e von Soest, 2020, Mental health and psychosocial characteristics of breast augmentation patients, J Health Psychol, 25, 1270, 10.1177/1359105318754645 Schwartz, 1999, Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research, Soc Sci Med, 48, 1531, 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00047-7 Sprangers, 1999, Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model, Soc Sci Med, 48, 1507, 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3 Menez, 2018, Multicenter evaluation of quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction, a long-term retrospective study, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 63, 126, 10.1016/j.anplas.2017.07.022 Anota, 2014, Item response theory and factor analysis as a mean to characterize occurrence of response shift in a longitudinal quality of life study in breast cancer patients, Health Qual Life Outcome, 12, 32, 10.1186/1477-7525-12-32 Santosa, 2018, Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction, JAMA Surg, 153, 891, 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677 Fracon, 2018, Patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction: implants Vs. Autologous tissues, Acta Chir Plast, 59, 120 Orr, 2019, Assessing the relationship between anxiety and revision surgery following autologous breast reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 144, 24, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005696 Roberts, 2015, Once is rarely enough: a population-based study of reoperations after postmastectomy breast reconstruction, Ann Surg Oncol, 22, 3302, 10.1245/s10434-015-4716-8 Wyrwich, 2005, Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes, Qual Life Res, 14, 285, 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2