Giant hiatal hernias: direct hiatus closure has an acceptable recurrence rate

Updates in Surgery - Tập 63 - Trang 75-81 - 2011
Giovanni Pallabazzer1, Stefano Santi1, Paolo Parise1, Biagio Solito1, Patrizia Giusti2, Mauro Rossi1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Esophageal Surgery Unit, Tuscany Regional Referral Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Disease, Pisa, Italy
2Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Cisanello Hospital, Pisa, Italy

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze our results after laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernias with direct closure of the hiatus, since the reports document a radiological recurrence rate as high as 42%. Various studies have shown that laparoscopic hernia repair is safe and effective, and carries a lower morbidity than the open approach, but the high recurrence rates still being reported (ranging from 10 to 42%) have prompted many authors to recommend using a prosthesis. This is a report on the follow-up of 38 patients with type III and IV hiatal hernia who underwent laparoscopic repair with direct hiatal closure without the aid of meshes. From January 2000 to March 2010, 38 patients with III and IV hiatal hernia were treated at the Surgery Division of Cisanello Hospital in Pisa. Data were collected retrospectively and included demographics, preoperative symptoms, radiographic and endoscopic findings, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative symptoms, barium X-ray and follow-up by medical examination and symptoms questionnaire. The sample included 12 males and 26 females, between 36 and 83 years (median age 62) with 26 type III (68.4%) and 12 type IV (31.6%) hernias. There were no conversions to laparotomy and no intraoperative or postoperative mortality. A 360° Nissen fundoplication was performed in 22 patients (57.9%) and a 270° Toupet fundoplication in 16 patients (42.1%). One patient had intraoperative complications (2.6%), and postoperative complications occurred in another three (7.9%). The follow-up was complete in all patients and ranged from 12 to 88 months (median 49 months). Barium swallow was performed in all patients and recurrence was found in five patients (13.1%); three of these patients (7.9%) were asymptomatic, while two (5.2%) were reoperated. All 38 patients’ symptoms improved. Judging from our data, the recurrence rate after laparoscopic giant hiatal hernia repair with direct hiatal closure can be lowered by complying with several crucial surgical principles, e.g., complete sac excision and appropriate crural closure, adequate esophageal lengthening, and the addition of an antireflux procedure and a gastropexy. We recorded a radiological recurrence rate of 13.1% (5/38) and patient satisfaction in our series was quite high (92%). Based on these findings, the laparoscopic treatment of giant hernias with direct hiatal closure seems to be a safe and effective procedure.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Morino M, Giaccone C, Pellegrino L, Rebecchi F (2006) Laparoscopic management of giant hiatal hernia: factors influencing long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 20(7):1011–1016 Luketich JD, Raja S, Fernando HC, Campvell W, Christie NA, Buenaventura PO, Weigel TL, Keenan RJ, Schauer PR (2000) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 232(4):608–618 Buenaventura PO, Schauer PR, Keenan RJ, Luketich JD (2000) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12(3):179–185 Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Huprich JE, Quek M, Hagen JA, Crookes PF, Theisen J, DeMeester SR, Sillin LF, Bremner CG (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow-up reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190(5):553–560 Targarona EM, Novell J, Vela S, Cerdan G, Bendahan G, Torrubia S, Kobus C, Rebasa P, Balague C, Garriga J, Trias M (2004) Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 18(7):1045–1050 Smith GS, Isacson JR, Draganic BD, Baldas HG, Falk GL (2004) Symptomatic and radiological follow-up after paraesophageal hernia repair. Dis Esophagus 17(4):279–284 Granderath FA, Carlson MA, Champion JK, Szold A, Basso N, Pointer R, Frantzides CT (2006) Prosthetic closure of the esophageal hiatus in large hiatal hernia repair and laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg End 20(3):367–379 Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–500 Jobe BA, Aye RW, Denevey CW, Domreis JS, Hill LD (2002) Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years. J Gastrointest Surg 6(2):181–188 Khaitan L, Houston H, Sharp K, Holzman M, Richards W (2002) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate. Am Surg 68(6):546–551 Johnson JM, Carbonell AM, Carmody BJ, Jamal MK, Maher JW, Kellum JM, DeMaria EJ (2006) Laparoscopic mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hernias and fundoplications: a critical analysis of the available literature. Surg Endosc 20(3):362–366 Soper NJ, Dunnegan D (1999) Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 229(5):669–676 Granderath FA, Granderath UM, Pointner R (2008) Laparoscopic revisional fundoplication with circular hiatal mesh prosthesis: the long term results. World J Surg 32(6):999–1007 Müller-Stich BP, Holzinger F, Kapp T, Klaiber C (2006) Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement. Surg Endosc 20(3):380–384 Granderath FA, Carlson MA, Champion JK, Szold A, Basso N, Pointner R, Frantzides CT (2006) Prosthetic closure of the esophageal hiatus in large hiatal hernia repair and laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 20(3):367–379 Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Walenz T, McBride PJ, Smith SL, Katada N, Kingler PJ (1997) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Arch Surg 132(6):586–589 Watson DI, Davies N, Devitt PG, Jamieson GG (1999) Importance of dissection of the hernial sac in laparoscopic surgery for large hiatal hernias. Arch Surg 134(10):1069–1073 Horgan S, Eubanks TR, Jacobsen G, Omelanczuk P, Pellegrini CA (1999) Repair of paraesophageal hernias. Am J Surg 177(5):354–358 Swanstrom LL, Jobe BA, Kinzie LR, Horvath KD (1999) Esophageal motility and outcomes following paraesophageal hernia repair and fundoplication. Am J Surg 177(5):359–363 Dahlberg PS, Deschamps C, Miller DL, Allen MS, Nichols FC, Pairolero PC (2001) Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Ann Thorac Surg 72(4):1125–1129 Wiechmann RJ, Ferguson MK, Naunheim KS, McKesey P, Hazelrigg SJ, Santucci TS, Macherey RS, Landreneau RJ (2001) Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation. Ann Thorac Surg 71(4):1080–1086 Pierre AF, Luketich JD, Fernando HC, Christie NA, Buenaventura PO, Litle VR, Schauer PR (2002) Results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernias: 200 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg 74(6):1909–1915 Mattar SG, Bowers SP, Galloway KD, Hunter JG, Smith CD (2002) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 16(5):745–749 Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP (2002) A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137(6):649–652 Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2003) Laparoscopic revisional refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 138(8):902–907 Champion JK, Rock D (2003) Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 17:551–553 Diaz S, Brunt LM, Klingensmith ME, Frisella PM, Soper NJ (2003) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 1:59–66 Leeder PC, Smith G, Dehn TC (2003) Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 17(9):1372–1375 Ponsky J, Rosen M, Fanning A, Malm J (2003) Anterior gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17(7):1036–1041 Keidar A, Szold A (2003) Laproscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with selective use of mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13(3):149–154 Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R (2005) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 140(1):40–48 Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, Jobe B, Polissar N, Mitsumori L, Nelson J, Swanstrom L (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–490 Hazebroek EJ, Ng A, Yong DH, Berry H, Leibman S, Smith GS (2008) Evaluation of lightweight titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 22(11):2428–2432 Coluccio G, Ponzio S, Ambu V, Tramontano R, Cuomo G (2000) Dislocation into the cardial lumen of a PTFE prosthesis used in the treatment of voluminous hiatal sliding hernia, a case report. Min Chir 55:341–345 Standlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Michael Brunt L, Hunter JG, DeMeester TR, Swantrom LL, Daniel Smith C, Filipi CJ (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23(6):1219–1226 Willikes Cl, Eedoga JK, Frezza EE (1998) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Ann Surg 228(4):623–624