Ghosts in the data: false detections in VEMCO pulse position modulation acoustic telemetry monitoring equipment

Animal Biotelemetry - Tập 3 Số 1 - 2015
Colin A. Simpfendorfer1, Charlie Huveneers2, Andre Steckenreuter3, Katherine Tattersall4, Xavier Hoenner4, Robert Harcourt5, Michelle R. Heupel6
1Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture & College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Building 34, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia
2School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia
3Integrated Marine Observing System–Australian Animal Tracking and Monitoring System, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, 2088, Australia
4Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 110, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
5Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
6Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Chambert T, Miller DAW, Nichols JD. Modeling false positive detections in species occurrence data under different study designs. Ecology 2015;96:332–9. doi: 10.1890/14-1507.1 .

Marques TA, Thomas L, Ward J, DiMarzio N, Tyack PL. Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors: an example with Blainville’s beaked whales. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125(4):1982–94. doi: 10.1121/1.3089590 .

Bardeli R, Wolff D, Kurth F, Koch M, Tauchert KH, Frommolt KH. Detecting bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic monitoring. Pat Rec Lett. 2010;31(12):1524–34. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.014 .

Blumstein DT, Mennill DJ, Clemins P, Girod L, Yao K, Patricelli G, et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48(3):758–67.

Heupel MR, Semmens JM, Hobday AJ. Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar Freshw Res. 2006;57(1):1–13.

Heupel MR, Webber DM. Trends in acoustic tracking: where are the fish going and how will we follow them?. In: McKenzie J, Parsons B, Seitz A, Kopf RK, Mesa M, Phelps Q, editors. Advances in Fish Tagging and Marking Technology. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society; 2012. p. 219–31.

Voegeli FA, Smale MJ, Webber DM, Andrade Y, O’Dor RK. Ultrasonic telemetry, tracking and automated monitoring technology for sharks. Env Biol Fish. 2001;60(1–3):267–81.

Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Fitzpatrick R. Large-scale movement and reef fidelity of grey reef sharks. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3):e9650.

Pincock DG. False detections: what they are and how to remove them from detection data. Amirix Document DOC-004691 Version 03. 2012; Available: http://vemco.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/false_detections.pdf .

Udyawer V, Chin A, Knip DM, Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR. Variable response of coastal sharks to severe tropical storms: environmental cues and changes in space use. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2013;480:171–83.

Heupel MR, Reiss KL, Yeiser BG, Simpfendorfer CA. Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers. Limn Ocean-Meth. 2008;6:327–35.

Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Collins AB. Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting. Can J Fish Aq Sci. 2008;65(3):482–92.