Geographic fragmentation and declining dominance: Yet another story of AT&T’s decline in the post-divestiture era
Tóm tắt
Why do dominant incumbents decline? Extant analyses of declining dominance largely focus on the erosion of technological bases of dominance. In contrast, our novel explanation focuses on the effect of geographic fragmentation on the erosion of demand-side barriers to entry and rise in strategic rivalry along the evolutionary path of the dominant incumbent’s growing industry. Our theoretical setting specifies a variation in demand-side structural characteristics across and within the independent geographic sub-markets of the dominant incumbent’s industry to simulate spatial and temporal variation in entry and competitive conditions. A unique unbalanced panel of independent geographic sub-markets in the US Long-distance telecommunications services industry during 1990–1996 provides the empirical setting to test a few novel hypotheses concerning the decline of a dominant incumbent under conditions of increasing geographic fragmentation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adner R, Zemsky P (2006) A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J. 27(3):215–239
Athey S, Schmutzler A (2001) Investment and market dominance. Rand J Econ 32(1):1–26
Bain JS (1956) Barriers to new competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. In: Armstrong M, Porter RH (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1990) Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. Rand J Econ 21(1):1–26
Bhaskarabhatla A, Klepper S (2014) Latent submarket dynamics and industry evolution: lessons from the U.S. laser industry. Ind Corp Chang 23(6):1381–1415
Bronnenberg BJ, Dhar SK, Dubé J-P (2011) Endogenous sunk costs and the geographic differences in the market structures of CPG categories. Quant Mark Econ 9:1–23
Bronnenberg B, Dubé JP, Joo J (2022a) millennials and the take-off of craft brands: preference formation in the U.S. Beer Industry. Marketing Science forthcoming
Bronnenberg B, Dubé JPH, Syverson C (2022b) Intangible Marketing Capital. NBER Working Paper 30145 http://www.nber.org/papers/w30145
Buenstorf G, Klepper S (2010) Submarket dynamics and innovation: the case of the US tire industry. Ind Corp Chang 19(5):1563–1587
Buenstorf G, Guenther C, Wilfling S (2022) Submarket emergence, customer base expansion and strategic entry timing in the evolution of the German farm tractor industry. Ind Corp Chang 31(4):1086–1112
Cabral LM (2002) Increasing dominance with no efficiency effect. J Econ Theory 102:471–479
Caves RE, Porter M (1978) Market structure, oligopoly and stability of market shares. J Ind Econ 26:289–313
Caves RE, Fortunato M, Ghemawat P (1984) The Decline of Dominant Firms, 1905–1929. Q J Econ (August):523–546
Chen MJ, Hambrick DC (1995) Speed, stealth, and selective attack: how small firms differ. Acad Manag J 38:453–482
Crandall RW (1991) After the breakup: U.S. telecommunications in a more competitive era. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
Crandall RW and Waverman L (1996) Talk is cheap. Brookings Institution Press
D’Aveni RA (1989) The aftermath of organizational decline: a longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. Acad Manag J 32:577–605
D’Aveni R (1994) Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Freedom Press, New York
Davies SW, Geroski PA (1997) Changes in concentration, turbulence, and the dynamics of market shares. Rev Econ Stat 79:383–391
Doraszelski U, Markovich S (2007) Advertising dynamics and competitive advantage. Rand J Econ 38(3):557–592
Eaton BC, Lipsey RG (1980) Exit barriers are entry barriers: the durability of capital as a barrier to entry. Bell J Econ 11(2):721–729
FCC (1997). In: Eisner J, Rangos K (eds) Distribution of equal access lines and presubscribed lines. Industry Analysis Division, FCC, Washington, DC, p 20554
FCC (1999). In: Zolnierek J, Rangos K, Eisner J (eds) Long distance market shares fourth quarter 1998. Industry Analysis Division, FCC, Washington, DC, p 20554
Ferrier WJ, Smith KG, Grimm CM (1999) The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: a study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad Manag J 42(4):372–388
Figueiredo JM, Silverman BS (2007) Churn, baby, churn: strategic dynamics among dominant and fringe firms in a segmented industry. Manag Sci 53(4):632–650
Gilbert RJ (1989) Mobility barriers and the value of incumbency. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Hambrick DC, D’Aveni RA (1988) Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Adm Sci Q 33:1–23
Hausman JA (1978) Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271
Hausman JA (1995) Competition in long-distance and telecommunications equipment markets: effects of the MFJ. Manag Decis Econ 16:365–383
H’orner J (2004) A perpetual race to stay ahead. Rev Econ Stud 71:1065–1088
Kahai SK, Kaserman DL, Mayo JW (1996) Is the “dominant” firm dominant? An empirical analysis of AT&T’s market power. J Law Econ 39(2):499–517
King A, Tucci C (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: the role of experience in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Manag Sci 48(2):171–186
Klepper S, Thompson P (2006) Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. Rand J Econ 37(4):861–886
Klette TJ, Kortum S (2004) Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. J Polit Econ 112(5):986–1018
Knittel CR (1997) Interstate long-distance rates: search costs, switching costs, and market power. Rev Ind Organ 12(4):519–536
Kraushaar JM (1993) Fiber deployment update: End of year 1992. Federal Communications Commission
Lieberman M (1987) Excess capacity as a barrier to entry: an empirical appraisal. J Ind Econ 35:607–627
MacAvoy P (1995) Tacit collusion under regulation in the pricing of interstate long-distance telephone services. J Econ Manag Strategy 4(2):147–185
Manral L (2010) Demand competition and investment heterogeneity in industries based on systemic technologies: evidence from US long-distance telecommunications services industry, 1984–1996. J Evol Econ 20(5):765–802
Manral L (2015) The demand-side dynamics of entrant heterogeneity. J Evol Econ 25:401–445
Manral L (2018) An evolutionary theory of demand-side determinants of strategy dynamics. Manag Res Rev 41(3):314–344
Manral L (2022) The demand-side dynamics of firms’ within-industry geographic scope. J Strateg Manag 15(4):665–690
Manral L, Harrigan KR (2016) The performance implications of demand-side diversification: evidence from the US telecommunications sector, 1990–1996. J Strateg Mark 24(7):551–577
Manral L, Harrigan KR (2018) The logic of demand-side diversification: evidence from the US telecommunications sector, 1990–1996. J Bus Res 85:127–141
McGahan AM, Ghemawat P (1994) Competition to retain customers. Mark Sci 13:165–176
Miller D, Chen MJ (1996) The simplicity of competitive repertoires: an empirical analysis. Strateg Manag J 17(6):419–439
Mitchell W (1989) Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 34:208–230
Mitchell W (1991) Dual clocks: entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strateg Manag J 12(2):85–100
Mitchell BM, Vogelsang I (1991) Telecommunications pricing, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mueller D (1986) Profits in the long run. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nalebuff B (2004) Bundling as an entry barrier. Q J Econ 119(1):159–188
Porter ME (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J 12(S2):95–117
Salop SC, Brenner SR, Roberts GL (1990) Market power in the supply of long-distance telephone services. Prepared for U.S. Sprint and submitted to the Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 90-132
Schmidt J, Makadok R, Keil T (2016) Customer-specific synergies and market convergence. Strateg Manag J 37(9):2003–2007
Schmalensee R (1985) Standards for dominant firm conduct: what can economics contribute? In: Hay Donald, Vickers John (eds) The economics of market dominance. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Smith KG, Grimm CM, Gannon MJ (1992) Competitive dynamics. SAGE, Washington, DC
Spence AM (1976) Product differentiation and welfare. Am Econ Rev 66(2):407–414
Spence AM (1977) Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J Econ 8:534–544
Spurge L (1998) MCI: failure is not an option, How MCI invented competition in telecommunications. Knowledge Exchange
Sutton J (1991) Sunk costs and market structure: price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration. MIT Press, Cambridge
Taylor W, Taylor L (1993) Post divestiture long-distance competition in the United States. AER Papers and Proceedings, pp 185–190
Ward MR (1995) Measurements of market power in long distance telecommunications. Bureau of Economic Staff Report, FTC, Washington DC.
Worcester DA (1957) Why dominant firms decline. J Polit Econ 65(4):338–346
Ye G, Priem RL, Alshwer AA (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: how combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ Sci 23(1):207–224