Geoelectrical Fingerprinting of Two Contrasting Ecohydrological Peatland Types in the Alps
Tóm tắt
Peatlands are valuable but fragile ecosystems with diverse biogeochemical and hydrological functions, so their characterization requires non-destructive investigation. We studied adjacent alpine peatlands of similar size, at the same altitude, and exposed to identical climatic conditions, but with differing topographic and geologic settings producing contrasting ecohydrological functioning; one is a rainwater-fed bog, the other is a groundwater-fed fen. Two intentionally simple geoelectrical techniques were applied to obtain rapid geophysical fingerprints of these peatlands: vertical electrical sounding (VES) and self-potential (SP). Strongly contrasting results agree with conceptual understandings of bogs and fens. The bog VES displays a high-resistivity near-surface layer, corresponding to lowly-mineralized rainwater, while resistivity in the fen is two orders of magnitude lower due to more highly-mineralized groundwater. The SP profile of the bog indicates radially-divergent drainage, while the profile of the fen points to lateral groundwater inflow from adjacent slopes. The paired-peatland approach made possible identification and isolation of the effects of hydrological functioning on geophysical properties, while eliminating possible differences due to climate or altitude. Most importantly, this study shows that very few and simple geophysical measurements can produce critical near-real-time data on hydrologic properties of peatlands – which is especially important for inaccessible high alpine locations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chalikakis K, Plagnes V, Guerin R, Valois R, Bosch FP (2011) Contribution of geophysical methods to karst-system exploration: an overview. Hydrogeology Journal 19(6):1169–1180
Chapin FSI, Korner C (1994) Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9(2):45–47
Chen Z, Goldscheider N (2014) Modeling spatially and temporally varied hydraulic behavior of a folded karst system with dominant conduit drainage at catchment scale, Hochifen-Gottesacker, Alps. Journal of Hydrology 514:41–52
Comas X, Slater L (2004) Low-frequency electrical properties of peat. Water Resources Research 40(12):W12414
Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14(1):314–317
Goldscheider N (2005) Fold structure and underground drainage pattern in the alpine karst system Hochifen-Gottesacker. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 98(1):1–17
Göppert N, Goldscheider N (2008) Solute and colloid transport in karst conduits under low- and high-flow conditions. Ground Water 46(1):61–68
Hanninen P (1992) Application of ground penetrating radar techniques to peatland investigations. Geological Survey of Finland Special Paper 12:159–162
He G, Li K, Liu X, Gong Y, Hu Y (2014) Fluxes of methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide in an alpine wetland and an alpine grassland of the Tianshan Mountains, China. Journal of Arid Land 6(6):717–724
Holton D, Frampton A, Cvetkovic V (2006) Implications of the “observer effect” on modelling a long-term pumping test with hydraulically conductive boreholes in a discrete fracture network system. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 2006, American Geophysical Union
Jardani A, Revil A, Dupont JP (2006) Self-potential tomography applied to the determination of cavities. Geophysical Research Letters 33(13):L13401
Jouniaux L, Maineult A, Naudet V, Pessel M, Sailhac P (2009) Review of self-potential methods in hydrogeophysics. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 341(10):928–936
Meyer JH (1989) Investigation of Holocene organic sediments—a geophysical approach. International Peat Journal 3:45–57
Milsom J, Eriksen A (2015) Field geophysics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 304 pp
Pollock MM, Naiman RJ, Hanley TA (1998) Plant species richness in riparian wetlands - a test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79(1):94–105
Revil A, Pezard PA, Glover PWJ (1999) Streaming potential in porous media, 1; theory of the zeta potential. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(B9):20021–20031
Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2013) The biology of peatlands, 2e. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sass O, Friedmann A, Haselwanter G, Wetzel KF (2010) Investigating thickness and internal structure of alpine mires using conventional and geophysical techniques. Catena 80(3):195–203
Scott DA, Jones TA (1995) Classification and inventory of wetlands - a global overview. Vegetatio 118(1–2):3–16
Shotyk W (1988) Review of the inorganic geochemistry of peats and peatland waters. Earth-Science Reviews 25(2):95–176
Slater LD, Reeve A (2002) Investigating peatland stratigraphy and hydrogeology using integrated electrical geophysics. Geophysics 67(2):365–378
Smyth MM (1992) Geophysical mapping techniques to investigate the geological structure of two raised bogs, Clara and Raheenmore. Co. Offaly. In Irish-Dutch Peatland Study. National Parks & Wildlife Service, Dublin
Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 770
Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin CQ, Hefting MM (2006) Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(2):96–103
Wall G (1998) Implications of global climate change for tourism and recreation in wetland areas. Climatic Change 40(2):371–389
Weber KA (1907) Aufbau und Vegetation der Moore Norddeutschlands. Bericht über die Zusammenkunft der Freien Vereinigung der Systematischen Botaniker und Pflanzengeographen 4:19–34
Zhang W-J, Xiao H-A, Tong C-L, Su Y-R, Xiang W-S, Huang D-Y, Syers JK, Wu J (2008) Estimating organic carbon storage in temperate wetland profiles in Northeast China. Geoderma 146(1–2):311–316
Zhu R, Liu Y, Ma J, Xub H, Sun L (2008) Nitrous oxide flux to the atmosphere from two coastal tundra wetlands in eastern Antarctica. Atmospheric Environment 42(10):2437–2447
Zohdy AA, Eton GP, Mabey DR (1974) Application of surface geophysics to ground-water investigations in Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Chapter D1. US Geological Survey