Genotype-by-environment interaction of fertility traits in Danish Holstein cattle using a single-step genomic reaction norm model
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor T (2010) Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score1. J Dairy Sci 93(2):743–752
Banos G, Wall E, Coffey MP, Bagnall A, Gillespie S, Russell GC, et al. (2013) Identification of immune traits correlated with dairy cow health, reproduction and productivity. PLOS ONE 8(6):e65766
Bennedsgaard T, Klaas IC, Vaarst M. (2006). Outphasing of antibiotics in organic dairy production-challenges for the epidemiologist. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics. Cairns, Australia
Bennedsgaard TW, Klaas IC, Vaarst M (2010) Reducing use of antimicrobials-experiences from an intervention study in organic dairy herds in Denmark. Livest Sci 131(2-3):183–192
Berry DP, Kearney J, Twomey K, Evans R (2013) Genetics of reproductive performance in seasonal calving dairy cattle production systems. Ir J Agric Food Res 52(1):1–16
Calus M, Groen A, De Jong G (2002) Genotype× environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J Dairy Sci 85(11):3115–3123
Calus M, Janss L, Veerkamp R (2006) Genotype by environment interaction for somatic cell score across bulk milk somatic cell count and days in milk. J Dairy Sci 89(12):4846–4857
Cardoso F, Tempelman R (2012) Linear reaction norm models for genetic merit prediction of Angus cattle under genotype by environment interaction 1. J Anim Sci 90(7):2130–2141
Christensen OF, Lund MS (2010) Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet Sel Evol 42(1):2
Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen B, Ostersen T, Su G (2012) Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. Animal 6(10):1565–1571
De Jong G, Bijma P (2002) Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci 78(3):195–214
De Vries A (2006). Determinants of the cost of days open in dairy cattle. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics: Cairns, Australia, pp 1114–1115
Dempfle A, Hinney A, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Raab M, Geller F, Gudermann T, et al. (2004) Large quantitative effect of melanocortin-4 receptor gene mutations on body mass index. J Med Genet 41(10):795–800
Durinck S, Moreau Y, Kasprzyk A, Davis S, De Moor B, Brazma A, et al. (2005) BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21(16):3439–3440
Falconer D (1990) Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res 56(1):57–70
Falconer DS, Mackay TF, Frankham R (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Burnt Mill, Harlow, UK
Gao H, Christensen OF, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Zhang Y, Lund MS, et al. (2012) Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population. Genet Sel Evol 44(1):8
Ghiasi H, Pakdel A, Nejati-Javaremi A, Mehrabani-Yeganeh H, Honarvar M, González-Recio O, et al. (2011) Genetic variance components for female fertility in Iranian Holstein cows. Livest Sci 139(3):277–280
Heino K (1999) Evolution of resource allocation between growth and reproduction in animals with indeterminate growth. J Evolut Biol 12(3):423–429
Hou Y, Madsen P, Labouriau R, Zhang Y, Lund M, Su G (2009) Genetic analysis of days from calving to first insemination and days open in Danish Holsteins using different models and censoring scenarios1. J Dairy Sci 92(3):1229–1239
Hurley DJ (2014). The relationship of immunity and reproduction in dairy cows. In: 25th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Cairns, Australia, p 1
Ismael A, Løvendahl P, Fogh A, Lund MS, Su G (2017) Improving genetic evaluation using a multitrait single-step genomic model for ability to resume cycling after calving, measured by activity tags in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 100(10):8188–8196
Ismael A, Strandberg E, Berglund B, Kargo M, Fogh A, Løvendahl P (2016) Genotype by environment interaction for the interval from calving to first insemination with regard to calving month and geographic location in Holstein cows in Denmark and Sweden. J Dairy Sci 99(7):5498–5507
Jamrozik J, Fatehi J, Kistemaker G, Schaeffer L (2005) Estimates of genetic parameters for Canadian Holstein female reproduction traits. J Dairy Sci 88(6):2199–2208
Knap P, Su G (2008) Genotype by environment interaction for litter size in pigs as quantified by reaction norms analysis. Animal 2(12):1742–1747
Kolmodin R, Strandberg E, Madsen P, Jensen J, Jorjani H (2002) Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agric Scand, Sect A-Anim Sci 52(1):11–24
Lee K-B, Zhang K, Folger JK, Knott JG, Smith GW (2014) Evidence supporting a functional requirement of SMAD4 for bovine preimplantation embryonic development: a potential link to embryotrophic actions of follistatin. Biol Reprod 91(3):62
Li Q, Jimenez-Krassel F, Ireland JJ, Smith GW (2009) Gene expression profiling of bovine preovulatory follicles: gonadotropin surge and prostanoid-dependent up-regulation of genes potentially linked to the ovulatory process. Reproduction 137(2):297–307
Liu A, Lund MS, Wang Y, Guo G, Dong G, Madsen P, et al. (2017) Variance components and correlations of female fertility traits in Chinese Holstein population. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8(1):56
Liu Z, Jaitner J, Reinhardt F, Pasman E, Rensing S, Reents R (2008) Genetic evaluation of fertility traits of dairy cattle using a multiple-trait animal model. J Dairy Sci 91(11):4333–4343
Madsen P, Sørensen P, Su G, Damgaard LH, Thomsen H, Labouriau R. (2013). A user’s guide to DMU-a package for analysing multivariate mixed models. Version 6; release 5.2. http://dmu.agrsci.dk/DMU/Doc/Current/dmuv6_guide.5.2.pdf .
Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I (2009) Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92(9):4648–4655
Mota R, Guimarães S, Fortes M, Hayes B, Silva F, Verardo L, et al. (2017) Genome‐wide association study and annotating candidate gene networks affecting age at first calving in Nellore cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 134(6):484–492
Oliveira D, Lourenco D, Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Santos D, de Araújo Neto F, et al. (2018) Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation. J Anim Sci 96(1):27–34
Ozkan ZS, Deveci D, Kumbak B, Simsek M, Ilhan F, Sekercioglu S, et al. (2014) What is the impact of Th1/Th2 ratio, SOCS3, IL17, and IL35 levels in unexplained infertility? J Reprod Immunol 103:53–58
Paolini B, Maltese P, Del Ciondolo I, Tavian D, Missaglia S, Ciuoli C, et al. (2016) Prevalence of mutations in LEP, LEPR, and MC4R genes in individuals with severe obesity. Genet Mol Res 15(3):n. pag
Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL (2014) The role of leptin in energy homeostasis in humans. J Endocrinol 223(1):T83–T96
Rutanen J, Pihlajamäki J, Karhapää P, Vauhkonen I, Kuusisto J, Mykkänen LM, et al. (2004) The Val103Ile polymorphism of melanocortin‐4 receptor regulates energy expenditure and weight gain. Obes Res 12(7):1060–1066
Salleh N, Giribabu N (2014) Leukemia inhibitory factor: roles in embryo implantation and in nonhormonal contraception. Sci World J 2014:201514
Santana M, Eler J, Cardoso F, Albuquerque L, Ferraz J (2013) Phenotypic plasticity of composite beef cattle performance using reaction norms model with unknown covariate. Animal 7(2):202–210
Schneider MdP, Strandberg E, Ducrocq V, Roth A (2005) Survival analysis applied to genetic evaluation for female fertility in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 88(6):2253–2259
Silva F, Mulder H, Knol E, Lopes M, Guimarães S, Lopes P, et al. (2014) Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach 1. J Anim Sci 92(9):3825–3834
Strandberg E, Kolmodin R, Madsen P, Jensen J, Jorjani H (2000) Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied by use of reaction norms. Inter Bull 25:41–45
Su G, Lund MS, Sorensen D (2007) Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate1. J Anim Sci 85(6):1385–1392
Su G, Madsen P (2011). User’s Guide for Gmatrix. A program for computing Genomic relationship matrix. http://www.dmu.agrsci.dk/Gmatrix/Doc/Current/GmatrixV2-User-Guide.pdf .
Su G, Madsen P, Lund MS (2009) Reaction norm model with unknown environmental covariate to analyze heterosis by environment interaction. J Dairy Sci 92(5):2204–2213
Su G, Madsen P, Lund MS, Sorensen D, Korsgaard IR, Jensen J (2006) Bayesian analysis of the linear reaction norm model with unknown covariates 1. J Anim Sci 84(7):1651–1657
Su G, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Mäntysaari EA, Aamand GP, Christensen OF, et al. (2012) Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. J Dairy Sci 95(2):909–917
Sun C, Madsen P, Lund M, Zhang Y, Nielsen U, Su G (2010) Improvement in genetic evaluation of female fertility in dairy cattle using multiple-trait models including milk production traits 1. J Anim Sci 88(3):871–878
Sun C, Madsen P, Nielsen US, Zhang Y, Lund MS, Su G (2009) Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population. J Dairy Sci 92(8):4063–4071
Sundberg T, Rydhmer L, Fikse W, Berglund B, Strandberg E (2010) Genotype by environment interaction of Swedish dairy cows in organic and conventional production systems. Acta Agric Scand Sect A 60(2):65–73
Veerkamp R, Mulder H, Thompson R, Calus M (2011) Genomic and pedigree-based genetic parameters for scarcely recorded traits when some animals are genotyped. J Dairy Sci 94(8):4189–4197
Wang H, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Muir W (2012) Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. Genet Res 94(2):73–83