Genotype × Environment Effects on Single‐Plant Selection at Low Density for Yield and Stability in Climbing Dry Bean Populations

Wiley - Tập 50 Số 3 - Trang 775-783 - 2010
Ioannis S. Tokatlidis1, Ioannis Papadopoulos2, Dimitrios Baxevanos3, Olga Koutita4
1Dep. of Agricultural Development Democritus Univ. of Thrace Orestiada 68200 Greece
2Technological Education Institute of W. Macedonia Florina 53100 Greece
341 Palaiologou Larissa 41223 Greece
4Dep. of Plant Breeding Hellenic Sugar Industry S.A. 57400, Sindos Thessaloniki Greece

Tóm tắt

Breeders ought to consider the confounding effects of the environment and genotype × environment (G × E) interaction on response to early generation selection. To meet this requirement, honeycomb breeding was performed at a low density within two dry bean populations (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under typical open‐field conditions and in an adjacent greenhouse. Nineteen progeny lines were formed through selection of nine and ten of the highest‐yielding plants in the greenhouse and the field, respectively. Honeycomb progeny testing at the low density in the two distinct environments showed up to 75% improvement in plant‐yield potential. Under farming‐density conditions in five environments, six of the lines outyielded the respective original population by 12 to 38% and exhibited the greatest stability according to the genotype and genotype × environment (GGE) biplot model. At low density, the greenhouse evaluation demonstrated less acquired variance than the field evaluation and was especially useful for selection and progeny evaluation. Three of the six outstanding lines originated from the greenhouse. Honeycomb progeny estimation on a single‐plant yield basis in the greenhouse, rather than in the field, gave a better prediction of yield potential on an area basis. The results showed that honeycomb breeding performed in two environments to address the G × E interaction may be successful for developing varieties that exhibit both high and stable productivity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0008IPBS

10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030009x

Baxevanos D., 2007, Interrelationship among and repeatability of seven stability indices estimated from commercial cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) variety evaluation trials in three Mediterranean countries, Euphytica, 161, 371, 10.1007/s10681-007-9586-0

10.2135/cropsci2001.413854x

Christakis P.A., 2002, The effects of the genotype by environmental interaction on the fixation of heterosis in tomato, J. Agric. Sci., 139, 55, 10.1017/S0021859602002198

10.2135/cropsci2005.09.0334

Fasoula D.A., 1997, Competitive ability and plant breeding, Plant Breed. Rev., 14, 89

Fasoula V.A., 2000, Honeycomb breeding: Principles and applications, Plant Breed. Rev., 18, 177

10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00026-6

Fasoulas A.C., 1995, Honeycomb selection designs, Plant Breed. Rev., 13, 87, 10.1002/9780470650059.ch3

10.1071/AR9630742

10.1007/BF00040364

10.1007/s10722-004-0981-2

Ipsilantis C.G., 2005, Plant density effects on grain yield per plant in maize: Breeding implications, Asian J. Plant Sci., 4, 31, 10.3923/ajps.2005.31.39

10.2134/1999.geneticsandexploitation.c30

10.2135/cropsci2004.0314

10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010037x

10.1007/BF00035428

10.1007/BF00265344

10.1016/j.fcr.2005.09.013

10.1007/s10681-005-0149-y

10.2134/agronj2001.931227x

10.2135/cropsci2001.412345x

Papoutsi‐Costopoulou H., 2001, Improving a local common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) population for yield, seed size and earliness, Plant Var. Seeds, 14, 25

10.1007/s10681-005-5694-x

10.1007/BF02859324

10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0322

10.2135/cropsci2008.04.0218

10.1017/S0021859608007867

10.2135/cropsci2005.0125

10.2134/agronj2000.9251020x

Yan W., 2001, GGEbiplot—a Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two‐way data, Crop Sci., 93, 1111

Yan W., 2002, Singular‐value partition in biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data, Agron. J., 94, 990

10.2135/cropsci2004.0340