Generosity, anonymity, gender

Andreoni, 2001, Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293, 10.1162/003355301556419 Ben-Ner, 2004, Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving, Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 581, 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00065-5 Bogardus, 1928 Bohnet, 1999, Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: comment, American Economic Review, 89, 335, 10.1257/aer.89.1.335 Bohnet, 1999, The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 43, 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00121-8 Bolton, 1995, An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior, Economics Letters, 48, 287, 10.1016/0165-1765(94)00621-8 Bolton, 1998, Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness, International Journal of Game Theory, 27, 269, 10.1007/s001820050072 Charness, G., Gneezy, U. What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, in press. DeGroot, 1975 Dufwenberg, M., Muren, A., 2002. Discrimination by gender and social distance. Working Paper 2002:2. Department of Economics, Stockholm University. Eckel, 1998, Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments, Economic Journal, 108, 726, 10.1111/1468-0297.00311 Eckel, 2001, Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games, Economic Inquiry, 39, 171, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00059.x Fershtman, 2001, Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 351, 10.1162/003355301556338 Forsythe, 1994, Fairness in simple bargaining experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347, 10.1006/game.1994.1021 Frohlich, 2000, Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46, 271, 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00178-0 Frohlich, 2004, Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test, Public Choice, 119, 91, 10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024169.08329.eb Hoffman, 1994, Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games, Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346, 10.1006/game.1994.1056 Hoffman, 1996, Social distance and other-regarding behavior in bargaining games, American Economic Review, 86, 653 Holm, 2000, Gender based focal points, Games and Economic Behavior, 32, 292, 10.1006/game.1998.0685 Holm, H.J., Engseld, P., 2001. Choosing bargaining partners—an experimental study on the impact of information about income and gender. Working Paper 2001:10. Department of Economics, Lund University. Johannesson, 2000, Non-reciprocal altruism in dictator games, Economics Letters, 69, 137, 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00283-4 Juvonen, 1993, How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcome on publicly communicated attributions, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 365, 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.365 2000 Rege, 2004, The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations, Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1625, 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00021-5 Roth, 1995, Bargaining experiments, 253 Shogren, 1989, Fairness in bargaining requires a context: an experimental examination of loyalty, Economics Letters, 31, 319, 10.1016/0165-1765(89)90022-0 Siegel, 1988