General practitioners’ experiences in consultations with foreign language patients after the introduction of a user’s fee for professional interpretation: a qualitative interview study
Tóm tắt
In 2018, an amendment to the Danish Health Care Act was passed making it a requirement for patients not proficient in Danish to pay for interpretation services in health care settings. Thereafter there has been a drastic decline in the use of professional interpreters, especially in general practice. We aimed to investigate the experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in establishing an understanding with these patients in consultations, without the presence of a professional interpreter. The study was qualitative, based on semi-structured interviews with nine purposively selected GPs. Analysis was by interpretative phenomenological analysis. The GPs said that after the amendment was passed, the patients chose to almost exclusively use family members or friends as ad hoc interpreters, or they attended consultations with no interpreter present at all. The GPs experienced that the use of family interpreters caused specific problems, due to both their relationship with the patient and their lack of professional interpretation skills. If no mediator was present the GPs perceived the establishment of understanding as extremely challenging. This was particularly the case if patients had chronic conditions, mental or psychosocial problems or if cultural barriers were present. According to the GPs, the challenges were not exclusively restricted to a lack of language translation, but could also involve intertwined cultural barriers or social problems. The impairment in mutual understanding had different consequences, and led to poorer treatment at many levels in health care. The lack of access to a professional interpreter also presented the GP with ethical and legal dilemmas. The GPs experienced that the changes in interpretation provision for patients in health care had led to professional interpretation being almost absent from general practice settings for patients subject to the fee. This led to several communication challenges, insufficient understanding in consultations, and poorer treatment of these, often very vulnerable, patients. The situation could, however, also involve the risk of epistemic injustice. The GPs experienced the situation as very unsatisfactory; it both comprised their ability to exercise their professionalism and their ethical obligations and restricted their legal rights.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Zendedel R, Schouten BC, van Weert JCM, van den Putte B. Informal interpreting in general practice: the migrant patient's voice. Ethn Health. 2018;23(2):158–73.
Schouten BC, Cox A, Duran G, Kerremans K, Banning LK, Lahdidioui A, et al. Mitigating language and cultural barriers in healthcare communication: Toward a holistic approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(12)2604–8.
Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62(3):255–99.
Gentile P. Political ideology and the De-professionalisation of public service interpreting: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom as case studies. In: Valero-Garcés C, Tipton R, editors. Ideology, Ethics and Policy Development in Public Service Interpreting and Translation, Interpreting and Social Justice in a Globalised World. eBook: Multilingual Matters; 2017.
Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet. Forslag til lov om ændring af sundhedsloven 23 March 2018. Retsinformation. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/ft/201712L00213. Accessed 29 Apr 2022.
Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet. Bekendtgørelse om tolkebistand efter sundhedsloven 2018. Retsinformation. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/855. Accessed 5 Dec 2021.
Slot LV, Wessel AU. Egenbetaling for tolkebistand. Lægers erfaringer med ordningen. Copenhagen: Lægeforeningen og Institut for menneskerettigheder; 2019.
Michaelis C, Krasnik A, Norredam M. Introduction of user fee for language interpretation: effects on use of interpreters in Danish health care. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31(4)705–7.
Rasi S. Impact of language barriers on access to healthcare services by immigrant patients: a systematic review. Asia Pac J Health Manag. 2020;15(1)35–48.
Al Shamsi H, Almutairi AG, Al Mashrafi S, Al KT. Implications of language barriers for healthcare: a systematic review. Oman Med J. 2020;35(2):e122.
Ku L, Flores G. Pay now or pay later: providing interpreter services in health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(2):435–44.
Bischoff A, Denhaerynck K. What do language barriers cost? An exploratory study among asylum seekers in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:248.
Jacobs EA, Shepard DS, Suaya JA, Stone EL. Overcoming language barriers in health care: costs and benefits of interpreter services. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(5):866–9.
Li S, Pearson D, Escott S. Language barriers within primary care consultations: an increasing challenge needing new solutions. Educ Prim Care. 2010;21(6):385–91.
Stange KC. The generalist approach. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3):198–203.
Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–54.
Rosenberg E, Seller R, Leanza Y. Through interpreters' eyes: comparing roles of professional and family interpreters. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(1):87–93.
Brisset C, Leanza Y, Laforest K. Working with interpreters in health care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):131–40.
Brisset C, Leanza Y, Rosenberg E, Vissandjee B, Kirmayer LJ, Muckle G, et al. Language barriers in mental health care: a survey of primary care practitioners. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(6):1238–46.
Patriksson K, Nilsson S, Wigert H. Conditions for communication between health care professionals and parents on a neonatal ward in the presence of language barriers. Int Jqual Stud Health. 2019;14(1):1652060.
Hilder J, Gray B, Dowell A, Macdonald L, Tester R, Stubbe M. 'It depends on the consultation': revisiting use of family members as interpreters for general practice consultations - when and why? Aust J Prim Health. 2017;23(3):257–62.
Hadziabdic E, Heikkila K, Albin B, Hjelm K. Migrants' perceptions of using interpreters in health care. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(4):461–9.
Hadziabdic E, Hjelm K. Arabic-speaking migrants' experiences of the use of interpreters in healthcare: a qualitative explorative study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:49.
MacFarlane A, Glynn LG, Mosinkie PI, Murphy AW. Responses to language barriers in consultations with refugees and asylum seekers: a telephone survey of Irish general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:68.
Leanza Y, Boivin I, Rosenberg E. Interruptions and resistance: a comparison of medical consultations with family and trained interpreters. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(12):1888–95.
Greenhalgh T, Robb N, Scambler G. Communicative and strategic action in interpreted consultations in primary health care: a Habermasian perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(5):1170–87.
Brandenberger J, Tylleskar T, Sontag K, Peterhans B, Ritz N. A systematic literature review of reported challenges in health care delivery to migrants and refugees in high-income countries - the 3C model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):755.
Komaric N, Bedford S, van Driel ML. Two sides of the coin: patient and provider perceptions of health care delivery to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:322.
Robertshaw L, Dhesi S, Jones LL. Challenges and facilitators for health professionals providing primary healthcare for refugees and asylum seekers in high-income countries: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e015981.
Gray B, Hilder J, Stubbe M. How to use interpreters in general practice: the development of a New Zealand toolkit. J Prim Health Care. 2012;4(1):52–61 A1-8.
Rosenberg E, Leanza Y, Seller R. Doctor-patient communication in primary care with an interpreter: physician perceptions of professional and family interpreters. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):286–92.
MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Gravenhorst K, O'Reilly-de Brun M, de Brun T, van den Muijsenbergh M, et al. Involving migrants in the adaptation of primary care services in a 'newly' diverse urban area in Ireland: the tension between agency and structure. Health Place. 2021;70:102556.
Roberts C, Sarangi S, Moss B. Presentation of self and symptoms in primary care consultations involving patients from non-English speaking backgrounds. Commun Med. 2004;1(2):159–69.
Moss B, Roberts C. Explanations, explanations, explanations: how do patients with limited English construct narrative accounts in multi-lingual, multi-ethnic settings, and how can GPs interpret them? Fam Pract. 2005;22(4):412–8.
Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. London: Sage; 2009.
Langdridge D, Hagger-Johnson G. Phenomenological research methods. Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.; 2013.
Jensen NK, Norredam M, Priebe S, Krasnik A. How do general practitioners experience providing care to refugees with mental health problems? A qualitative study from Denmark. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:17.
Langberg EM, Dyhr L, Davidsen AS. Development of the concept of patient-centredness - a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1228–36.
Fernandez-Gutierrez M, Bas-Sarmiento P, Albar-Marin MJ, Paloma-Castro O, Romero-Sanchez JM. Health literacy interventions for immigrant populations: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. 2018;65(1):54–64.
Peled Y. Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings. Bioethics. 2018;32(6):360–7.
Helholdt JD. Lægeløftet. Lægeforeningen. https://www.laeger.dk/laegeloeftet. Accessed 5 Dec 2021.
Fiscella K, Shin P. The inverse care law: implications for healthcare of vulnerable populations. J Ambul Care Manage. 2005;28(4):304–12.
Kristensen MAT, Guassora AD, Arreskov AB, Waldorff FB, Holge-Hazelton B. I've put diabetes completely on the shelf till the mental stuff is in place'. How patients with doctor-assessed impaired self-care perceive disease, self-care, and support from general practitioners. A qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36(3):342–51.
Stormacq C, Wosinski J, Boillat E, Van den Broucke S. Effects of health literacy interventions on health-related outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults living in the community: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(7):1389–469.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3 ed. London: Sage; 2002. p. 2002.
Flyvbjerg B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq. 2006;12(2):219–45.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.